This is an uncorrected proof.
Figures
Abstract
Background
Hantavirus causes hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS). Strong inflammatory responses and vascular leakage are important hallmarks of these often fatal diseases. The mechanism behind pathogenesis is unknown and no specific treatment is available. IL-6 was recently highlighted as a biomarker for HPS/HFRS severity. IL-6 signaling is complex and context dependent: while classical signaling generally provide protective responses, trans-signaling can cause severe pathogenic responses. Here, we investigated a potential role for IL-6 trans-signaling in hantavirus pathogenesis.
Methods
Effects of IL-6 trans-signaling during in vitro hantavirus infection were assessed using primary human endothelial cells treated with recombinant soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R). Plasma from Puumala orthohantavirus-infected HFRS patients (n=28) were analyzed for IL-6 trans-signaling potential and its associations to severity.
Findings
In vitro, sIL-6R treatment of infected cells enhanced IL-6 and CCL2 secretion, upregulated ICAM-1, and affected VE-cadherin leading to a disrupted cell barrier integrity. HFRS patients showed altered plasma levels of sIL-6R and soluble gp130 (sgp130) resulting in an increased sIL-6R/sgp130 ratio suggesting enhanced IL-6 trans-signaling potential. Plasma sgp130 levels negatively correlated with number of interventions and positively with albumin levels. Patients receiving oxygen treatment displayed a higher sIL-6R/sgp130 ratio compared to patients that did not.
Author summary
IL-6 has dual effects; while providing important antiviral responses it can also cause severe pathogenesis. IL-6 mediated effects are activated by two different mechanisms: classical signaling and trans-signaling. IL-6 trans-signaling has recently been shown to be responsible for IL-6 mediated pathogenesis. Endothelial cells lack membrane-bound IL-6 receptor and only respond to IL-6 trans-signaling. Orthohantaviruses cause hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS). Specific treatments and vaccines are lacking. Deregulated vascular permeability and inflammation are hallmarks of HPS and severe HFRS. However, the mechanisms underlying hantavirus disease are unknown, hampering the development of treatments. Orthohantaviruses primarily infect endothelial cells. Previous studies have demonstrated a correlation between elevated IL-6 levels and increased severity of HPS and HFRS. Whether this link is causal, and if so the mechanisms behind it, has not been determined. Here, we show that hantavirus-infected endothelial cells produce large amounts of IL-6 and that they are highly sensitive to IL-6 trans-signaling. Together this strongly amplifies the IL-6 production and disrupts the endothelial cell barrier. When analyzing a potential role for IL-6 trans-signaling in patients, we observed increased systemic IL-6 trans-signaling potential, and that this was linked to severity, in Puumala virus-infected HFRS-patients.
These data suggest the two hallmarks of HPS and HFRS, increased vascular permeability and strong inflammation, are linked via hantavirus-induced endothelial cell IL-6 production and IL-6 trans-signaling effects. Treatment targeting IL-6 trans-signaling might provide a therapeutic strategy for HPS and severe HFRS.
Citation: Maleki KT, Niemetz L, Christ W, Byström JW, Thunberg T, Ahlm C, et al. (2025) IL-6 trans-signaling mediates cytokine secretion and barrier dysfunction in hantavirus-infected cells and correlate to severity in HFRS. PLoS Pathog 21(4): e1013042. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013042
Editor: David Safronetz, Public Health Agency of Canada, CANADA
Received: January 11, 2025; Accepted: March 13, 2025; Published: April 9, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Maleki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All data are available in the main text or the Supporting information.
Funding: This work was supported by Region Västerbotten and Umeå University (RV-579011, RV-734361, and RV-965866 to CA), the Heart-Lung Foundation (20170334 and 20150752 to CA), the Swedish Research Council (2024-02578 to JK), and the center for medical innovation (CIMED) (2020-0141 to JK). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Orthohantavirus is a genus of single-stranded negative sense RNA viruses [1]. Orthohantaviruses, hereafter referred to as hantaviruses, are transmitted to humans via inhalation of aerosolized virions from rodent excreta. Puumala virus (PUUV) is the most prevalent hantavirus species in Europe and causes hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) [2]. HFRS patients typically present with headache, fever, myalgia and renal symptoms [2,3]. Fatality rates ranges between 0.4 to around 10%, depending on the specific hantavirus [2,3]. In the Americas, hantaviruses such as Andes virus (ANDV) cause hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS), a disease characterized by influenza-like symptoms and severe pulmonary dysfunction with a fatality rate of around 30-40% [3]. Lung involvement is also seen in many PUUV-infected HFRS patients [4]. Hantavirus primarily infects endothelial cells, especially in the lungs [2]. Increased vascular permeability is a prominent hallmark of hantavirus infection, responsible for the life-threatening pulmonary dysfunction in HPS and severe HFRS [2]. However, the mechanism behind hantavirus-induced vascular permeability is not known. As hantavirus-infected cells are protected from apoptosis [5,6], it is likely that other factors than endothelial cell death are involved in the etiology of vascular permeability during hantavirus infection [2,3].
HFRS and HPS patients commonly exhibit high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines [7–11]. Recently, we and others reported that IL-6 is associated with increased disease severity in HPS [7,12]. In addition, we showed that serum IL-6 levels are higher in fatal compared to non-fatal HPS cases [7]. In PUUV-caused HFRS, high plasma IL-6 levels have been associated with high serum creatinine levels, thrombocytopenia and longer hospitalization, suggesting that IL-6 is associated with increased disease severity in HFRS [13]. The mechanisms behind the association between IL-6 and disease severity of hantavirus infections are currently unknown.
IL-6 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine with many functions including in eliciting the acute phase response and promoting T cell activation and B cell maturation [14]. IL-6 signals via a receptor complex consisting of the IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) and gp130 [14,15]. Classical IL-6 signaling is achieved upon binding of IL-6 to membrane bound IL-6R and gp130 [14,15]. While gp130 is expressed by all cells, IL-6R is expressed mainly by certain immune cells and hepatocytes. Thus, classical IL-6 signaling is restricted to these IL-6R-expressing cell types [14,15]. However, proteolytic cleavage and alternative splicing create soluble IL-6R (sIL-6R) that binds to IL-6 with low affinity [16]. In turn, the soluble IL-6:sIL-6R complex can bind to gp130 on any cell and allow for so called IL-6 trans-signaling [15,17]. Hence, trans-signaling allows for IL-6 signaling in cells with low or absent IL-6R expression. Recently, it has become evident that trans-signaling is the predominant pathway behind IL-6 mediated pathogenesis [18]. Also gp130 exists as a soluble version, soluble gp130 (sgp130), produced by proteolytic cleavage as well as alternative splicing [19]. sgp130 can bind to the IL-6:sIL-6R complex, hindering binding to membrane bound gp130, thereby inhibiting IL-6 trans-signaling [19]. In blood, sIL-6 and sgp130 levels are high, and their ratio will determine the IL-6 trans-signaling potential, thereby affecting the potential pathogenic effects of IL-6 in circulation [18].
Endothelial cells can produce high levels of IL-6 [20]. As endothelial cells express no or very little IL-6R, they per se do not seem to respond to the IL-6 they produce [20–23]. However, it has been shown that addition of sIL-6R to endothelial cell cultures renders them responsive to IL-6 via trans-signaling [21].
Here, we sought to investigate the source of IL-6 during hantavirus infection, as well as the possible consequences of IL-6 trans-signaling on infected vascular endothelial cells. We show that endothelial cells produce large amounts of IL-6 upon PUUV-infection. Addition of sIL-6R to PUUV-infected endothelial cells, allowing for IL-6 trans-signaling, lead to strongly enhanced secretion of IL-6 and CCL2 and upregulation of ICAM-1 on the cell surface. In addition, we show that sIL-6R treatment caused VE-cadherin internalization and increased permeability in infected endothelial cells. Finally, we show that HFRS patients exhibit altered levels of sIL-6R and sgp130, and that this correlate to markers of severity, suggesting a direct role for IL-6 trans-signaling in hantavirus pathogenesis.
Methods
Ethics statement
Ethical approval was obtained from the Regional Ethics Committee of Umeå University (application number 04-133M). All subjects provided written consent before participation in the study.
Patients
Twenty-eight HFRS patients were included in the study. Patients were diagnosed during the years 2006-2014, at the University Hospital of Umeå, Sweden. Twenty uninfected controls sampled in 2017 were included as control subjects. Peripheral blood was collected into CPT tubes, as described previously [24]. Following centrifugation, plasma was retrieved and stored at -80°C until analysis.
The HFRS cohort included 13 females and 15 males with a mean age of 49 years (range 18-78 years) and the controls included 7 females and 13 males of a mean age of 50 years (range 37-63 years) (Table 1). Samples were collected from the acute phase at a median of 5 days (range 2-7 days) post symptom debut, and from the convalescent phase at a median of 98 days (range 42-494 days) post symptom debut (Table 1).
Cells and viruses
Pooled human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) (Lonza) were maintained in endothelial growth medium (EGM-2) supplemented with EGM-2 endothelial SingleQuots (Lonza) in 5% CO2 at 37°C. Prior to experiments, hydrocortisone was excluded from the medium. Buffy coats from blood donors were purchased from Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from buffy coats using Lymphoprep (Stemcell Technologies) and maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (GE Healthcare) supplemented with 10% FCS (Sigma-Aldrich) and 2 mM L-glutamine (Life Technologies). PUUV strain CG1820 was propagated on A549 cells and ANDV strain Chile-9717869 on Vero E6 cells, as previously described [25]. Viral stocks were titrated on Vero E6 cells [25], these titers were then used for calculations of multiplicity of infection (MOI).
Infection and treatments
HUVECs were infected with 200 µl (in 24 well plates) or 1 ml (in 6 well plates) virus diluted in HUVEC medium at multiplicity of infection (MOI) 1. Cells were infected for 1 h in 5% CO2 at 37°C, with gentle shaking every 10 min. After infection, virus was removed and replaced with 1 ml fresh medium. At 48 h post infection, medium was replaced with medium containing recombinant human IL-6R alpha protein (R&D systems) at different concentrations. Cells without sIL-6R treatment and cells treated with 10 ng/ml recombinant IL-6 (rIL-6) (R&D systems), in addition to the sIL-6R treatment, were used as controls. After 24 h treatment, supernatants were collected and stored at -80°C until analysis.
PBMCs cultured in 96-well plates (1 million cells in 200 µl medium) were exposed to PUUV (MOI=3) for 2 h in 5% CO2 at 37°C. After infection, virus was removed and replaced with fresh medium. Supernatants were collected after a centrifugation step and stored at -80°C until analysis.
All experiments were performed in duplicates. Technical (HUVECs) and biological (PBMCs) replicates are provided in the figure legends.
Flow cytometric analyses
HUVECs were detached using Accutase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and then used for flow cytometry. HUVECs were stained with anti-ICAM-1 antibody conjugated with PE-Vio770 (Milteny Biotec) for 20 min at room temperature (RT). Live/Dead Aqua (Invitrogen) was used for the identification of dead cells. Cells were fixed for 30 min using Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (BD Biosciences). Samples were acquired on a BD LSR Fortessa instrument (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using FlowJo version 10.4.
ELISA
Prior to ELISA, plasma samples were diluted in ready-to-use ELISA diluent (Mabtech); 1:2 for IL-6 and IL-6/sIL-6R complex and 1:400 for sIL-6R and sgp130 ELISAs. Levels of IL-6 were analyzed using ELISA development kit (Mabtech) and levels of sIL-6R, IL-6:IL-6R complex, and sgp130 were analyzed using DuoSet ELISA kits (R&D), all according to the manufacturer’s guidelines.
There are three forms of sgp130 with molecular weights of 50, 90 and 110 kDa. Molar levels of sIL-6R and sgp130 in blood were calculated based on molecular weight of 51.5 kDa for sIL-6R, and 100 kDa for sgp130.
Immunofluorescence
HUVECs cultured on glass cover slips were fixed with pre-warmed 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at RT. Cells were then permeabilized using 0.5% Triton X for 5 min at RT, washed three times and blocked with 0.5% BSA in PBS for 30 min at RT. Cover slips were incubated with primary antibody for 1 h at RT, washed in PBS three times and then incubated with secondary antibody for 1 h at RT. VE-cadherin expression was detected using anti-VE-cadherin monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) and goat anti-rabbit IgG AF488 (Life Technologies). PUUV proteins were detected using polyclonal antibodies from convalescent patient serum for 1 h at RT and goat anti-human IgG AF647 (Life Technologies). Nuclei were stained using DAPI (Life Technologies). Washed cover slips were mounted onto glass slides using ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were examined by immunofluorescence confocal microscopy at 60X magnification. Images were analyzed using ImageJ.
Transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER)
HUVECs, uninfected or infected with PUUV for 24 h, were split onto HTS Transwell 24-well plates with 0.4 μm pore and 6.5 mm inserts (Corning) at a density of 1x105 cells in 100 µl per well. To the lower compartment, 600 µl medium was added. Cells were cultured at 37°C for 24 h and then treated with sIL-6R. The transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) was measured after 24 h using an EVOM2 epithelial voltohmmeter (World precision instruments), according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The mean TEER of three measurements/well was used to calculate the TEER/cm2.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using Graph Pad Prism v.9. Paired comparisons within HFRS patients were performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Comparisons between controls and acute and convalescent HFRS patients were performed using Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. Comparisons between in vitro conditions were performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s or Šídák’s multiple comparison test. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used for examining correlations.
Results
PUUV-infected cells demonstrate potent IL-6 secretion
To investigate possible sources of IL-6 production during hantavirus infection, we assessed IL-6 secretion from HUVECs and PBMCs. HUVECs were infected with PUUV at MOI 1 and supernatants were collected at 24, 48, and 72 h post infection. Infected HUVECs produced higher levels of IL-6 than uninfected HUVECs at 48 and 72 h post infection (Fig 1A). PBMCs were exposed to PUUV at MOI 3 and supernatants were collected after 24, 48, and 72 h. At 48 h post PUUV-exposure, PBMCs produced higher levels of IL-6 compared to unexposed PBMCs, albeit at lower concentrations than HUVECs (Fig 1B). Next, we examined the concentrations of sgp130 in the supernatants. In infected HUVECs, the levels of sgp130 were significantly increased at 72 h post infection (Fig 1C). In supernatants of PUUV-exposed PBMCs, no such increase was observed (Fig 1D). In the PBMC supernatants, also sIL-6R levels were analyzed. No significant increase in sIL-6R levels was observed in PUUV-exposed compared to unexposed PBMCs (Fig 1D). Together, these data show that PUUV induces strong IL-6 secretion in HUVECs and PBMCs, and that this coincides with increased production of sgp130 in HUVECs.
HUVECs were infected with PUUV (MOI=1) and PBMCs were exposed to PUUV (MOI=3) for 24-72 h. Supernatants were assessed for IL-6, soluble gp130 (sgp130), and soluble IL-6R (sIL-6R) using ELISA. (A) Levels of IL-6 in supernatants of HUVECs (n=3) and (B) PBMCs (24-48 h, n=6, 72 h, n=2). (C) sgp130 levels in supernatants of HUVECs (n=3). (D) Levels of sgp130 (n=2) and sIL-6R (24-48 h, n=8, 72 h, n=6) in PBMC supernatants. Two-way ANOVA followed by Šídák’s multiple comparison test (factors; time after infection and condition (uninfected or PUUV-infected)). *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01.
IL-6 trans-signaling in PUUV-infected cells drives inflammation
Having shown that HUVECs produce high levels of IL-6 upon PUUV-infection, we next investigated potential autocrine effects of IL-6 trans-signaling on endothelial cells. IL-6 trans-signaling in endothelial cells has been shown to increase secretion of IL-6 [21], and CCL2 [22,24]. As endothelial cells have been reported to be unresponsive to IL-6 treatment [21], inflammatory responses downstream of IL-6 were assessed after addition of recombinant sIL-6R, allowing for IL-6 trans-signaling to occur, to the cell cultures. At 48 h post infection, HUVEC medium was exchanged to fresh medium with or without different concentrations of sIL-6R. After 24 h of treatment, IL-6 and CCL2 levels in supernatants were determined by ELISA. Levels of IL-6 and CCL2 in supernatants were increased in infected HUVECs treated with sIL-6R, in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 2A and 2B). As expected [22,26], increased CCL2 secretion was also observed in uninfected HUVECs treated with recombinant IL-6 (rIL-6) along with the sIL-6R treatment (S1 Fig).
HUVECs were infected with PUUV (MOI=1) for 48 h and then treated with sIL-6R at the concentrations 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, or 500 ng/ml for 24 h or left untreated. (A) Levels of IL-6 (n=5) and (B) CCL2 (n=3) in supernatants of uninfected and PUUV-infected HUVECs. (C) Representative histogram plot and (D) graph showing median ICAM-1 expression on infected and uninfected HUVECs (n=3). Symbols depict mean and error bars indicate SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s or Šídák’s multiple comparison test (factors; level of sIL-6R added and condition (PUUV-infected or uninfected)). Black asterisks indicate significance when comparing PUUV to uninfected. Red asterisks indicate significance when comparing each sIL-6R-treated condition of PUUV-infected cells with untreated PUUV-infected cells. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001.
IL-6 signaling has been reported to increase the cell surface expression of ICAM-1 on endothelial cells [26–29]. Thus, ICAM-1 expression on HUVECs was assessed by flow cytometry. As previously observed for Hantaan hantavirus (HTNV) infected cells [30,31], higher ICAM-1 expression was observed on PUUV-infected, compared to uninfected, HUVECs (Fig 2C and 2D). Addition of sIL-6R to the cultures further increased the ICAM-1 expression on infected, but not uninfected, cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 2C and 2D). Together, these data indicate that endogenously produced IL-6 from PUUV-infected endothelial cells, in presence of sIL-6R, stimulate IL-6 trans-signaling in an autocrine manner that fuels the inflammatory responses by causing endothelial cell activation and increased secretion of IL-6 and CCL2.
Levels of IL-6 in supernatants were also increased in ANDV-infected HUVECs treated with sIL-6R (S2 Fig), suggesting this is a common feature of HFRS and HPS-causing hantaviruses.
PUUV-mediated IL-6 trans-signaling disrupts endothelial cell barrier functions
To further investigate the functional consequences of IL-6 trans-signaling, we sought to evaluate the barrier function in infected HUVEC monolayers. For this purpose, we first examined the expression of VE-cadherin in infected and uninfected cells, with or without sIL-6R, using immunofluorescence microscopy. In uninfected untreated cells, solid VE-cadherin junctions and intact cell monolayers were observed (Fig 3A). Addition of sIL-6R to uninfected cells had no clear effect on the VE-cadherin organization nor the cell integrity (Fig 3A). In contrast, internalization of VE-cadherin was seen in PUUV-infected HUVECs without sIL-6R treatment (Fig 3A). sIL-6R treatment of infected cells caused further downmodulation of VE-cadherin from the cell surface (Fig 3A). Interestingly, while the cell monolayer appeared to be intact in untreated PUUV-infected cells, sIL-6R treatment caused gap formation in the cell monolayer, indicating that the barrier function was severely disrupted (Fig 3A). As expected, a similar phenotype was observed when uninfected cells were treated with rIL-6 in addition to the sIL-6R treatment (S3 Fig), showing that this indeed was dependent on IL-6 trans-signaling.
Uninfected and infected HUVECs were treated with sIL-6R at the concentrations 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, or 500 ng/ml for 24 h or left untreated. (A) Immunofluorescence images showing expression of DAPI (blue), virus (red), and VE-cadherin (green). Representative images of three independent experiments are shown. (B) Transendothelial electrical resistance of uninfected (white symbol) and infected HUVECs (black symbol), with and without sIL-6R (n=3). Uninfected HUVECs treated with rIL-6 in addition to sIL-6R were used as control (grey symbol; n=3). Symbols depict mean and error bars indicate SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s or Šídák’s multiple comparison test (factors; level of sIL-6R added and condition (uninfected, PUUV-infected, or uninfected + rIL-6)). Black asterisks indicate significance when comparing PUUV to uninfected. Red asterisks indicate significance when comparing each sIL-6R-treated condition of PUUV-infected cells with untreated PUUV-infected cells. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001.
To further examine the endothelial cell barrier function upon sIL-6R treatment we analyzed the transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) in PUUV-infected and uninfected HUVECs. PUUV-infection alone caused decreased TEER compared to uninfected cells (Fig 3B). PUUV-infection together with sIL-6R treatment further caused a dose-dependent loss of barrier function 24 h post treatment, as indicated by decreased TEER compared to uninfected HUVECs and PUUV-infected untreated cells (Fig 3B). Similarly, a dose-dependent decrease in TEER was observed when uninfected cells were treated with rIL-6 + sIL-6R (Fig 3B). Supporting previous reports [32,33], rIL-6 treatment per se did not affect the monolayer permeability in uninfected HUVECs (Fig 3B). Collectively, these data indicate that IL-6 produced by PUUV-infected endothelial cells in an IL-6 trans-signaling dependent manner enhances VE-cadherin disorganization and loss of endothelial cell monolayer integrity.
The plasma sIL-6R/gp130 ratio is increased during acute HFRS
Given the pronounced effects of IL-6 trans-signaling observed in hantavirus-infected cells in vitro, we next sought to evaluate the levels of soluble IL-6 receptors in HFRS patients. The physiological effects of IL-6 largely depend on the levels of sIL-6R and sgp130 in circulation [15,18]. Although increased systemic IL-6 levels have been repeatedly reported in HFRS and HPS patients [7–9,11,12], the concentrations of sIL-6R and sgp130 have not yet been comprehensively studied in hantavirus-infected patients. Thus, we analyzed the levels of IL-6, sIL-6R, IL-6:sIL-6R complex, and sgp130 in plasma of 28 PUUV-infected HFRS patients, during acute and convalescent phase, as well as in 20 uninfected controls. The HFRS patients displayed typical symptoms for HFRS, showing thrombocytopenia, and elevated levels of creatinine and CRP (Table 1). Information regarding complications (thrombosis, severe bleeding) as well as information on medical interventions including administration of intravenous fluid, oxygen treatment, and platelet transfusion are presented in Table 1. IL-6 levels were, as previously reported [8,11], increased in acute HFRS (Figs 4A and S4A). Levels of sIL-6R were higher during acute, compared to the convalescent, HFRS, and similar to that observed in uninfected controls (Figs 4B and S4B). Levels of the IL-6:sIL-6R complex were not significantly altered during HFRS (Figs 4C and S4C) while sgp130 levels were decreased in both acute and convalescent HFRS, compared to controls (Figs 4D and S4D). sgp130 binds to the IL-6:sIL-6R complex thereby inhibiting binding of the complex to membrane bound gp130 [17]. Thus, when assessing the likelihood of IL-6 trans-signaling, the proportion of sIL-6R in relation to sgp130 is important to consider. To better assess the relation of the IL-6 receptors during HFRS, the ratio between sIL-6R and sgp130 was calculated. Interestingly, the sIL-6R/sgp130 ratio was significantly increased during acute HFRS, as compared to convalescent HFRS and controls (Figs 4E and S4E). This ratio was calculated based on ng/ml of the two proteins. However, the molecular weight of sgp130 is approximate 100 kDa whereas it is 51.5 kDa for sIL-6R. To calculate the relative number of these proteins we therefore finally re-calculated the ratios based on molecular weight. This revealed a median sIL-6R/sgp130 molar ratio of 0.47 during the acute phase and of 0.31 during the convalescent phase. Taken together, this suggests increased IL-6-trans-signaling potential during acute HFRS.
Plasma levels of (A) IL-6, (B) sIL-6R, (C) IL-6:sIL-6R complex, and (D) sgp130 in controls (n=20) and acute and convalescent HFRS patients (n=28). (E) Ratio of plasma sIL-6R and sgp130 in controls and HFRS patients (n=27). (F) Correlation between sgp130 levels and number of interventions during acute HFRS (n=28). (G) Correlation between sgp130 levels and serum albumin (n=13). (H) Plasma sIL-6R/sgp130 ratio in patients with or without oxygen treatment (median, interquartile range). Wilcoxon signed-rank test (acute and convalescent HFRS patients, A-E); Kruskal-Wallis test (comparisons between controls and acute and convalescent HFRS patients, A-E); red line depicts median. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient ( F-G). Mann Whitney test ( H); bars represent median. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001.
Sgp130 level and IL-6 trans-signaling potential correlate to disease severity
We finally analyzed for possible correlations of IL-6 signaling factors, including IL-6 trans-signaling potential, and severity of HFRS. This revealed that sgp130 levels were inversely correlated with the number of interventions in patients (Fig 4F), suggesting that patients with a more complicated disease had the lowest sgp130 levels. Furthermore, sgp130 levels positively correlated with serum albumin levels (Fig 4G), indicating that decreased sgp130 levels coincide with loss of serum albumin, which is indicative of increased vascular permeability. Severely affected patients show decreased oxygen saturation, requiring supportive oxygen treatment. Interestingly, patients receiving oxygen treatment showed significantly higher sIL-6R/sgp130 ratio than those that did not need oxygen treatment (Fig 4H). Together, this suggest low sgp130 levels and high IL-6 trans-signaling potential is associated with severe HFRS.
Discussion
HFRS and HPS are characterized by strong inflammatory responses and vascular permeability [2,3,7–11]. Despite significant morbidity and mortality in hantavirus-infected individuals, no specific treatments are available. Importantly, the mechanisms driving hantavirus-mediated pathogenesis are not known, hampering development of specific therapeutics. IL-6 has been highlighted as an important cytokine in hantavirus infections, as it is associated with HFRS and HPS disease severity [7,12,13]. However, the mechanism behind how IL-6 contributes to pathophysiology of hantavirus diseases has not been known. Here, we report IL-6 trans-signaling as a potential mechanism behind IL-6-mediated pathogenesis during hantavirus infections.
We observed that PUUV-infection stimulates IL-6 secretion in HUVECs and PBMCs. IL-6 secretion has previously been reported in cells infected with ANDV, HTNV, and Prospect Hill hantavirus [34,35]. When studying IL-6 signaling in vitro, it is important to consider the receptor availability on the cells of the model system. While gp130 is expressed by all cells, IL-6R is mainly expressed by hepatocytes and certain immune cells [14]. Endothelial cells express no or very little IL-6R, and therefore display no or limited responses to IL-6 per se [20,21,23]. This may explain why a previous study did not observe any effect upon IL-6 treatment of hantavirus-infected cells [32]. However, treatment of endothelial cells with recombinant IL-6 in combination with recombinant sIL-6R leads to IL-6 trans-signaling [21]. In turn, IL-6 trans-signaling in endothelial cells has been shown to cause secretion of IL-6 and CCL2 as well as upregulation of ICAM-1 on the cell surface [21,22,26–29]. Here, we recapitulated these findings in a PUUV-infection model. Using this model, we show that PUUV-induced endogenous IL-6, in presence of sIL-6R, activates endothelial cells in an autocrine manner. This activation caused upregulation of the adhesion molecule ICAM-1, indicating enhanced activation of the endothelial cells. This is in line with the increased plasma levels of soluble ICAM-1, VCAM-1, E-selectin, and syndecan-1 observed in HFRS patients [36]. PUUV-mediated IL-6 trans-signaling further promoted a pro-inflammatory loop with augmented secretion of IL-6 and CCL2. CCL2 is a known chemoattractant for T cells and myeloid cells [37,38]. Apart from its chemoattracting function, CCL2 also mediates attachment to vascular endothelial cells and trans-endothelial migration of T cells and myeloid cells [37–39]. Together, these data suggest that infected endothelial cells, in an IL-6 trans-signaling dependent manner, drives IL-6 production and hyperinflammation in HFRS/HPS patients.
Vascular permeability is a common hallmark of hantavirus infections [2,3]. The mechanism behind why hantavirus infection leads to massively increased vascular permeability, including the life-threatening pulmonary dysfunction observed in HPS, is largely unknown [3]. Here, we show that sIL-6R treatment of infected endothelial cells increases VE-cadherin disorganization and barrier permeability. This is in line with previous reports of other conditions and disease models showing VE-cadherin internalization and increased permeability of endothelial cells treated with IL-6 in combination with sIL-6R [28,33,40]. Remarkably, PUUV-infection alone, without sIL-6R treatment, caused some VE-cadherin internalization and decreased monolayer integrity. Previously, a VEGF/VEGFR2-dependent internalization of VE-cadherin has been described in ANDV- and HTNV-infected endothelial cells [41,42]. Such a VEGF-dependent mechanism could possibly explain the VE-cadherin disorganization and decreased membrane integrity seen in untreated PUUV-infected HUVECs. Taken together, these findings indicate that hantavirus infection alone to some extent modulates the endothelial cell barrier integrity, and that subsequent IL-6 trans-signaling further aggravates this, leading to a severe loss of barrier function. IL-6 trans-signaling has been shown to upregulate gp130 on vascular smooth muscle cells, causing an IL-6-driven autocrine activation loop [43]. This could potentially contribute to local and systemic inflammatory responses also during hantavirus infection.
The in vivo effects of IL-6 depend on the complex interactions of IL-6 with sIL-6R and sgp130, which constitute a buffer system that regulates the half-life and signaling of IL-6 [15,18,44]. While it is well-established that IL-6 levels are increased in HFRS and HPS patients, peripheral levels of sIL-6R and sgp130 have previously not been extensively studied in hantavirus-infected patients. Here, plasma sIL-6R levels were found to be elevated during the acute, compared to the convalescent, phase of HFRS. Intriguingly, compared to controls, lower plasma sgp130 concentration was observed during both acute and convalescent HFRS. This suggests that the blood IL-6 buffer, formed by sIL-6R and sgp130, is disturbed in the patients. As sgp130 can inhibit IL-6 trans-signaling [18], a decrease in sgp130 may have pathogenic consequences. In support of this notion, decreased sgp130 levels have been described in patients with type 2-diabetes [45], and in patients with coronary artery disease [46–48]. Furthermore, increased sgp130 levels have been associated with decreased odds of myocardial infarction [49]. The inverse correlation found between plasma sgp130 and number of interventions during acute HFRS indicates that patients with low sgp130 levels also have more severe symptoms. Albumin has been suggested as a marker of vascular permeability [50]. Thus, the observed positive correlation between sgp130 levels and serum albumin levels during acute HFRS may suggest a link between low sgp130 levels and increased vascular leakage. Interestingly, in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), low levels of serum albumin have been associated with more severe pulmonary symptoms [51]. Analyses of IL-6 receptor levels and of possible correlations to risk for severe and fatal outcome in HPS patients could help decipher the role of IL-6 trans-signaling in hantavirus-induced pathogenesis, as these patients in general are more severely ill than HFRS patients.
The here observed increased sIL-6R/sgp130 ratio in HFRS-patients suggests an increased IL-6-trans-signaling potential in the patients. Importantly, while classical signaling via membrane-bound IL-6R mainly seems to have homeostatic and protective effects, trans-signaling has recently emerged as the driver of IL-6 mediated pathogenesis [18]. In most HFRS patients, plasma IL-6 levels are not as strongly elevated as in HPS patients. Given the capacity of endothelial cells to produce large amounts of IL-6, it is possible that the concentration of IL-6 is higher at local sites of infection than systemically. It is further possible that highly vascularized sites, such as the lungs, have very high local concentrations of infected endothelial cell-derived IL-6, and therefore are more exposed to IL-6 trans-signaling. This scenario is consistent with the observations that lungs are heavily affected during HPS, and that almost all lung endothelial cells are infected in some patients [52–54]. Altogether, our data suggest altered concentrations of sIL-6R and sgp130 during hantavirus infection, which may increase the likelihood of IL-6 trans-signaling in infected endothelial cells and increased vascular permeability.
Treatment strategies targeting IL-6 signaling have proven successful in for example rheumatoid arthritis and for treatment of COVID-19 [18,55,56]. Importantly, IL-6 has regenerative and anti-inflammatory functions, which are mediated via classical signaling [44]. This suggests that in some cases complete blocking of IL-6 signaling might have negative effects. Neutralizing antibodies against the IL-6R, such as tocilizumab and sarilumab, inhibit binding of IL-6 to the IL-6R thereby inhibiting both classical and trans-signaling. Olamkicept, sgp130 fused to IgG1-Fc, has finished phase II clinical trial in inflammatory bowel disease patients. This compound specifically inhibits IL-6 trans-signaling [18], allowing for IL-6 classical signaling-dependent immune cell responses via membrane-bound IL-6R.
Further studies investigating the role of IL-6 in the pathogenesis of HFRS and HPS will be valuable for the assessment of the relevance of IL-6-targeting therapeutics in severe hantavirus infections. In conclusion, we show that PUUV-infected endothelial cells produce IL-6 that, in an IL-6 trans-signaling dependent manner, strongly affects infected endothelial cell functions. We further show a correlation between IL-6 trans-signaling potential and severity in HFRS patients. These findings suggest that IL-6 trans-signaling may represent a treatable target in HPS and severe HFRS.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Treatment with rIL-6 and sIL-6R in uninfected endothelial cells causes increased CCL2 secretion.
Levels of CCL2 in supernatants of uninfected and infected HUVECs treated with sIL-6R and/or rIL-6, or left untreated (n=3, except n=2 for 125 ng/ml). Symbols depict mean and error bars indicate SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s or Šídák’s multiple comparison test. Black asterisks indicate significance when comparing PUUV to uninfected. Red asterisks indicate significance when comparing each sIL-6R-treated conditions of PUUV-infected cells with untreated PUUV-infected cells. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013042.s001
(TIF)
S2 Fig. sIL-6R treatment of ANDV-infected endothelial cells, but not of uninfected control cells, causes increased IL-6 secretion.
Levels of IL-6 in supernatants of ANDV-infected and uninfected HUVECs treated with sIL-6R (250 or 500 ng/ml) or left untreated (n=2; data shown represent the mean value).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013042.s002
(TIF)
S3 Fig. Treatment with rIL-6 and sIL-6R affects the endothelial cell barrier in uninfected endothelial cells.
Immunofluorescence images showing expression of DAPI (blue), virus (red), and VE-cadherin (green). Representative images of three independent experiments are shown.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013042.s003
(TIF)
S4 Fig. The plasma sIL-6R/sgp130 ratio is increased during acute HFRS.
Plasma levels of (A) IL-6, (B) sIL-6R, (C) IL-6:sIL-6R complex, and (D) sgp130 in acute and convalescent HFRS patients (n=28). (E) Ratio of plasma sIL-6R and sgp130 in HFRS patients (n=27). Wilcoxon signed-rank test. **, p<0.01; ****, p<0.0001.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013042.s004
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
We thank the patients and volunteers who contributed clinical material to this study.
References
- 1. Bradfute SB, Calisher CH, Klempa B, Klingström J, Kuhn JH, Laenen L, et al. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Hantaviridae 2024. J Gen Virol. 2024;105:001975.
- 2. Klingström J, Smed-Sörensen A, Maleki K, Solà-Riera C, Ahlm C, Björkström N. Innate and adaptive immune responses against human Puumala virus infection: immunopathogenesis and suggestions for novel treatment strategies for severe hantavirus-associated syndromes. J Inter Med. 2019;285:510–23.
- 3. Vial PA, Ferrés M, Vial C, Klingström J, Ahlm C, López R, et al. Hantavirus in humans: a review of clinical aspects and management. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23(9):e371–82. pmid:37105214
- 4. Rasmuson J, Lindqvist P, Sörensen K, Hedström M, Blomberg A, Ahlm C. Cardiopulmonary involvement in Puumala hantavirus infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:501. pmid:24160911
- 5. Solà-Riera C, Gupta S, Ljunggren H-G, Klingström J. Orthohantaviruses belonging to three phylogroups all inhibit apoptosis in infected target cells. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:834.
- 6. Solà-Riera C, García M, Ljunggren H-G, Klingström J. Hantavirus inhibits apoptosis by preventing mitochondrial membrane potential loss through up-regulation of the pro-survival factor BCL-2. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(2):e1008297. pmid:32032391
- 7. Maleki KT, García M, Iglesias A, Alonso D, Ciancaglini M, Hammar U, et al. Serum Markers Associated with Severity and Outcome of Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome. J Infect Dis. 2019;219(11):1832–40. pmid:30698699
- 8. Linderholm M, Ahlm C, Settergren B, Waage A, Tärnvik A. Elevated plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, soluble TNF receptors, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-10 in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. J Infect Dis. 1996;173(1):38–43. pmid:8537680
- 9. Morzunov SP, Khaiboullina SF, St Jeor S, Rizvanov AA, Lombardi VC. Multiplex Analysis of Serum Cytokines in Humans with Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome. Front Immunol. 2015;6:432. pmid:26379668
- 10. Saksida A, Wraber B, Avšič-Županc T. Serum levels of inflammatory and regulatory cytokines in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:142.
- 11. Sadeghi M, Eckerle I, Daniel V, Burkhardt U, Opelz G, Schnitzler P. Cytokine expression during early and late phase of acute Puumala hantavirus infection. BMC Immunol. 2011;12:65. pmid:22085404
- 12. Angulo J, Martínez-Valdebenito C, Marco C, Galeno H, Villagra E, Vera L, et al. Serum levels of interleukin-6 are linked to the severity of the disease caused by Andes Virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(7):e0005757. pmid:28708900
- 13. Outinen TK, Mäkelä SM, Ala-Houhala IO, Huhtala HS, Hurme M, Paakkala AS, et al. The severity of Puumala hantavirus induced nephropathia epidemica can be better evaluated using plasma interleukin-6 than C-reactive protein determinations. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:132. pmid:20500875
- 14. Hunter CA, Jones SA. IL-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(5):448–57. pmid:25898198
- 15. Rose-John S. IL-6 trans-signaling via the soluble IL-6 receptor: importance for the pro-inflammatory activities of IL-6. Int J Biol Sci. 2012;8(9):1237–47. pmid:23136552
- 16. Mülberg J, Schooltink H, Stoyan T, Günther M, Graeve L, Buse G. The soluble interleukin-6 receptor is generated by shedding. Eur J Immunol. 1993;23:473–80.
- 17. Baran P, Hansen S, Waetzig G, Akbarzadeh M, Lamertz L, Huber H. The balance of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-6 soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R), and IL-6 sIL-6R sgp130 complexes allows simultaneous classic and trans-signaling. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:6762–75.
- 18. Rose-John S, Jenkins BJ, Garbers C, Moll JM, Scheller J. Targeting IL-6 trans-signalling: past, present and future prospects. Nat Rev Immunol. 2023;23(10):666–81. pmid:37069261
- 19. Narazaki M, Yasukawa K, Saito T, Ohsugi Y, Fukui H, Koishihara Y, et al. Soluble forms of the interleukin-6 signal-transducing receptor component gp130 in human serum possessing a potential to inhibit signals through membrane-anchored gp130. Blood. 1993;82(4):1120–6.
- 20. Podor TJ, Jirik FR, Loskutoff DJ, Carson DA, Lotz M. Human Endothelial Cells Produce IL‐6. Lack of responses to exogenous IL-6. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1989;557(1):374–87.
- 21. Modur V, Li Y, Zimmerman G, Prescott S, McIntyre T. Retrograde inflammatory signaling from neutrophils to endothelial cells by soluble interleukin-6 receptor alpha. J Clin Invest. 1997;100(6):2752–6.
- 22. Romano M, Sironi M, Toniatti C, Polentarutti N, Fruscella P, Ghezzi P, et al. Role of IL-6 and its soluble receptor in induction of chemokines and leukocyte recruitment. Immunity. 1997;6(3):315–25. pmid:9075932
- 23. Montgomery A, Tam F, Gursche C, Cheneval C, Besler K, Enns W, et al. Overlapping and distinct biological effects of IL-6 classic and trans-signaling in vascular endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2021;320(4):C554–65. pmid:33471622
- 24. Scholz S, Baharom F, Rankin G, Maleki KT, Gupta S, Vangeti S, et al. Human hantavirus infection elicits pronounced redistribution of mononuclear phagocytes in peripheral blood and airways. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(6):e1006462. pmid:28640917
- 25. Stoltz M, Ahlm C, Lundkvist Å, Klingström J. Lambda interferon (IFN-lambda) in serum is decreased in hantavirus-infected patients, and in vitro established infection is insensitive to treatment with all IFNs and inhibits IFN-gamma-induced nitric oxide production. J Virol. 2007;81:8685–91.
- 26. Suzuki M, Hashizume M, Yoshida H, Mihara M. Anti-inflammatory mechanism of tocilizumab, a humanized anti-IL-6R antibody: effect on the expression of chemokine and adhesion molecule. Rheumatol Int. 2010;30(3):309–15. pmid:19466425
- 27. Watson C, Whittaker S, Smith N, Vora AJ, Dumonde DC, Brown KA. IL-6 acts on endothelial cells to preferentially increase their adherence for lymphocytes. Clin Exp Immunol. 1996;105(1):112–9. pmid:8697617
- 28. Valle ML, Dworshak J, Sharma A, Ibrahim AS, Al-Shabrawey M, Sharma S. Inhibition of interleukin-6 trans-signaling prevents inflammation and endothelial barrier disruption in retinal endothelial cells. Exp Eye Res. 2019;178:27–36. pmid:30240585
- 29. Wung BS, Ni CW, Wang DL. ICAM-1 induction by TNFalpha and IL-6 is mediated by distinct pathways via Rac in endothelial cells. J Biomed Sci. 2005;12(1):91–101. pmid:15864742
- 30. Björkström NK, Lindgren T, Stoltz M, Fauriat C, Braun M, Evander M, et al. Rapid expansion and long-term persistence of elevated NK cell numbers in humans infected with hantavirus. J Exp Med. 2011;208(1):13–21. pmid:21173105
- 31. Yu H, Jiang W, Du H, Xing Y, Bai G, Zhang Y, et al. Involvement of the Akt/NF-κB pathways in the HTNV-mediated increase of IL-6, CCL5, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in HUVECs. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e93810. pmid:24714064
- 32. Niikura M, Maeda A, Ikegami T, Saijo M, Kurane I, Morikawa S. Modification of endothelial cell functions by Hantaan virus infection: prolonged hyper-permeability induced by TNF-alpha of hantaan virus-infected endothelial cell monolayers. Arch Virol. 2004;149(7):1279–92. pmid:15221531
- 33. Alsaffar H, Martino N, Garrett JP, Adam AP. Interleukin-6 promotes a sustained loss of endothelial barrier function via Janus kinase-mediated STAT3 phosphorylation and de novo protein synthesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2018;314(5):C589–602. pmid:29351406
- 34. Jiang H, Wang P-Z, Zhang Y, Xu Z, Sun L, Wang L-M, et al. Hantaan virus induces toll-like receptor 4 expression, leading to enhanced production of beta interferon, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Virology. 2008;380(1):52–9. pmid:18707748
- 35. Khaiboullina SF, Morzunov SP, St Jeor SC, Rizvanov AA, Lombardi VC. Hantavirus Infection Suppresses Thrombospondin-1 Expression in Cultured Endothelial Cells in a Strain-Specific Manner. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1077. pmid:27486439
- 36. Connolly-Andersen A-M, Thunberg T, Ahlm C. Endothelial activation and repair during hantavirus infection: association with disease outcome. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2014;1(1):ofu027. pmid:25734100
- 37. Carr M, Roth S, Luther E, Rose S, Springer T. Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 acts as a T-lymphocyte chemoattractant. Proc Natil Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:3652–6.
- 38. Gschwandtner M, Derler R, Midwood KS. More Than Just Attractive: How CCL2 Influences Myeloid Cell Behavior Beyond Chemotaxis. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2759. pmid:31921102
- 39. Lee CH, Zhang HH, Singh SP, Koo L, Kabat J, Tsang H, et al. C/EBPδ drives interactions between human MAIT cells and endothelial cells that are important for extravasation. Elife. 2018;7:e32532. pmid:29469805
- 40. Lo C-W, Chen M-W, Hsiao M, Wang S, Chen C-A, Hsiao S-M, et al. IL-6 trans-signaling in formation and progression of malignant ascites in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71(2):424–34. pmid:21123455
- 41. Gorbunova E, Gavrilovskaya IN, Mackow ER. Pathogenic hantaviruses Andes virus and Hantaan virus induce adherens junction disassembly by directing vascular endothelial cadherin internalization in human endothelial cells. J Virol. 2010;84(14):7405–11. pmid:20463083
- 42. Shrivastava-Ranjan P, Rollin PE, Spiropoulou CF. Andes virus disrupts the endothelial cell barrier by induction of vascular endothelial growth factor and downregulation of VE-cadherin. J Virol. 2010;84(21):11227–34. pmid:20810734
- 43. Klouche M, Bhakdi S, Hemmes M, Rose-John S. Novel path to activation of vascular smooth muscle cells: up-regulation of gp130 creates an autocrine activation loop by IL-6 and its soluble receptor. J Immunol. 1999;163(8):4583–9. pmid:10510402
- 44. Scheller J, Chalaris A, Schmidt-Arras D, Rose-John S. The pro- and anti-inflammatory properties of the cytokine interleukin-6. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1813(5):878–88. pmid:21296109
- 45. Aparicio-Siegmund S, Garbers Y, Flynn CM, Waetzig GH, Gouni-Berthold I, Krone W, et al. The IL-6-neutralizing sIL-6R-sgp130 buffer system is disturbed in patients with type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2019;317(2):E411–20. pmid:31237452
- 46. Schuett H, Oestreich R, Waetzig GH, Annema W, Luchtefeld M, Hillmer A, et al. Transsignaling of interleukin-6 crucially contributes to atherosclerosis in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32(2):281–90. pmid:22075248
- 47. Cui Y, Dai W, Li Y. Circulating levels of sgp130 and sex hormones in male patients with coronary atherosclerotic disease. Atherosclerosis. 2017;266:151–7. pmid:29028483
- 48. Korotaeva AA, Samoilova EV, Chepurnova DA, Zhitareva IV, Shuvalova YA, Prokazova NV. Soluble glycoprotein 130 is inversely related to severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Biomarkers. 2018;23(6):527–32. pmid:29580104
- 49. Moreno Velásquez I, Golabkesh Z, Källberg H, Leander K, de Faire U, Gigante B. Circulating levels of interleukin 6 soluble receptor and its natural antagonist, sgp130, and the risk of myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis. 2015;240(2):477–81. pmid:25910182
- 50. Vandoorne K, Addadi Y, Neeman M. Visualizing vascular permeability and lymphatic drainage using labeled serum albumin. Angiogenesis. 2010;13(2):75–85. pmid:20512410
- 51. Wu M, Fossali T, Pandolfi L, Carsana L, Ottolina D, Frangipane V, et al. Hypoalbuminemia in COVID-19: assessing the hypothesis for underlying pulmonary capillary leakage. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2021;289:861–72.
- 52. Nolte KB, Feddersen RM, Foucar K, Zaki SR, Koster FT, Madar D, et al. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome in the United States: a pathological description of a disease caused by a new agent. Hum Pathol. 1995;26(1):110–20. pmid:7821907
- 53. Boroja M, Barrie J, Raymond G. Radiographic findings in 20 patients with hantavirus pulmonary syndrome correlated with clinical outcome. Am J Roentgenol. n.d.;178:159–63.
- 54. Duchin JS, Koster FT, Peters CJ, Simpson GL, Tempest B, Zaki SR, et al. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome: a clinical description of 17 patients with a newly recognized disease. The Hantavirus Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(14):949–55. pmid:8121458
- 55. Tanaka T, Narazaki M, Ogata A, Kishimoto T. A new era for the treatment of inflammatory autoimmune diseases by interleukin-6 blockade strategy. Semin Immunol. 2014;26(1):88–96. pmid:24594001
- 56. Gordon A, Mouncey P, Al-Beidh F, Rowan K, REMAP-CAP Investigators. Interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically ill patients with Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;384:1491–502.