Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Structure-based design of an immunogenic, conformationally stabilized FimH antigen for a urinary tract infection vaccine

  • Natalie C. Silmon de Monerri ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    natalie.silmondemonerri@pfizer.com

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Ye Che ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ Former Pfizer employee

    Affiliation Discovery Sciences, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Joshua A. Lees,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Discovery Sciences, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Jayasankar Jasti ,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ Former Pfizer employee

    Affiliation Discovery Sciences, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Huixian Wu,

    Roles Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Discovery Sciences, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Matthew C. Griffor ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Project administration

    ‡ Former Pfizer employee

    Affiliation Discovery Sciences, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Srinivas Kodali,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Julio Cesar Hawkins,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Jacqueline Lypowy,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Christopher Ponce,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Kieran Curley,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Alexandre Esadze,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Juan Carcamo ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ Former Pfizer employee

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Thomas McLellan,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Discovery Sciences, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, United States of America

  • David Keeney ,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ Former Pfizer employee

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Arthur Illenberger ,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ Former Pfizer employee

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Yury V. Matsuka ,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ Former Pfizer employee

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Suman Shanker ,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ Former Pfizer employee

    Affiliation Discovery Sciences, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Laurent Chorro ,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ Former Pfizer employee

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Alexey V. Gribenko,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Seungil Han,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Discovery Sciences, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Annaliesa S. Anderson,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  •  [ ... ],
  • Robert G. K. Donald

    Roles Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, New York, New York, United States of America

  • [ view all ]
  • [ view less ]
?

This is an uncorrected proof.

Abstract

Adhesion of E. coli to the urinary tract epithelium is a critical step in establishing urinary tract infections. FimH is an adhesin positioned on the fimbrial tip which binds to mannosylated proteins on the urinary tract epithelium via its lectin domain (FimHLD). FimH is of interest as a target of vaccines to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI). Previously, difficulties in obtaining purified recombinant FimH from E. coli along with the poor inherent immunogenicity of FimH have hindered the development of effective FimH vaccine candidates. To overcome these challenges, we have devised a novel production method using mammalian cells to produce high yields of homogeneous FimH protein with comparable biochemical and immunogenic properties to FimH produced in E. coli. Next, to optimize conformational stability and immunogenicity of FimH, we used a computational approach to design improved FimH mutants and evaluated their biophysical and biochemical properties, and murine immunogenicity using a bacterial adhesion inhibition assay. This approach identified an immunogenic FimH variant (FimH-donor-strand complemented with FimG peptide ‘triple mutant’, FimH-DSG TM) capable of blocking bacterial adhesion that is produced at high yields in mammalian cells. By x-ray crystallography, we confirmed that the stabilized structure of the FimHLD in FimH-DSG TM is similar to native FimH on the fimbrial tip. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies elicited by FimH-DSG TM that can block bacterial binding to mannosylated surfaces identified 4 non-overlapping binding sites whose epitopes were mapped via a combinatorial cryogenic electron microscopy approach. Novel inhibitory epitopes in the lectin binding FimH were identified, revealing diverse functional mechanisms of FimH-directed antibodies with relevance to FimH-targeted UTI vaccines.

Author summary

Escherichia coli is the primary cause of urinary tract infections. Adherence to uroepithelial surfaces is mediated by the pilus adhesin protein FimH, which is of interest as a vaccine candidate. We developed a method for producing recombinant FimH at bioprocess scale, previously a barrier to commercial development. Structure-based design and screening was used to identify a novel FimH vaccine candidate with improved stability and immunogenicity (defined by bacterial adhesion inhibitory titers) in mice. Structure of this full-length protein was determined by X-ray crystallography and shown to closely resemble the pilus adhesin present in its native form on the bacterial surface. Binding sites of biologically active FimH monoclonal antibodies were determined by X-ray crystallography or by cryo-electron microscopy, providing insights into mechanisms by which antibodies block binding of the bacteria to urinary tract receptors.

Introduction

Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI) affect approximately 50% of women at least once during their lifetime [1]. In addition, sepsis-associated in-hospital mortality is significantly linked to UTI, resulting in a substantial burden on healthcare systems. Multidrug-resistant bacteria are frequently associated with UTI, which impacts routine urological practices [2]. While several organisms can cause UTI, the most common agent is uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC), which is associated with 75% of uncomplicated and 65% of complicated UTI [3]. UPEC colonize the gastrointestinal tract and migrate from the fecal flora to the urogenital tract, where they adhere to host uroepithelial cells and establish a reservoir for ascending infections of the urinary tract [4]. Adhesion is facilitated by fimbrial adhesins located on the bacterial surface, including type 1 fimbriae, which bind to mannosylated glycoproteins on bladder epithelial cells [5] as well as those secreted into the urine, e.g., uromodulin [6].

Type 1 fimbriae are highly conserved among clinical UPEC isolates and are encoded by the fim gene cluster, which encodes chaperone and usher proteins (FimC, FimD), various structural subunits (FimA, FimF, FimG), and an adhesin called FimH that is displayed on the fimbrial tip [7]. FimH is essential for all characteristics of UTI in mouse models that mimic aspects of human UPEC bladder infection: it mediates adhesion to target cells, intracellular invasion, biofilm formation, and resistance to killing by neutrophils [810]. FimH is under positive selection in E. coli human cystitis isolates and positively selected residues have been proposed to influence virulence in mouse models of cystitis [11]. In addition, it is important for uroepithelial cell shedding and invasion of bladder cells by E. coli [12,13]. Small molecule inhibitors that target FimH by mimicking mannosylated receptors are efficacious against UTI in animal models, further validating the role of FimH in UTI [14,15].

FimH is composed of two domains, an N-terminal lectin binding domain (FimHLD) responsible for binding to the terminal mannose moiety on epithelial glycoproteins, and a C-terminal pilin domain (FimHPD). FimHPD serves to link FimH to other structural subunits of the pilus such as FimG, through a mechanism called donor strand complementation [16]. FimHPD possesses an incomplete immunoglobulin-like fold, containing a groove that provides a binding site for the donor N-terminal β-strand of FimG, which when bound forms a strong intermolecular linkage with FimH. While FimHLD can be expressed in a soluble, stable form, full-length FimH is unstable unless produced as a complex with the chaperone FimC or complemented with the FimG N-terminal donor strand peptide (as an exogenous peptide or directly fused to FimH via a polypeptide linker) [17,18]. FimHLD transitions between two endpoint conformations: a ‘closed’ conformation with a high affinity for mannosylated proteins, and an ‘open’ conformation with a relatively compressed structure, a wide mannose binding pocket, that binds to mannosylated proteins with low affinity [19]. Conformation and ligand-binding properties of FimHLD are under the allosteric control of FimHPD, which itself exhibits only minor structural changes upon ligand binding [20,21]. Under static conditions, interaction between the lectin and pilin domains stabilizes FimHLD in a low-affinity, open conformation [21,22]. Upon binding to a mannose derivative (mannoside) ligand, FimHLD undergoes a conformational change leading to a high affinity state (with a 1000 to 100,000-fold higher affinity for mannose [21]), where the FimHLD and FimHPD remain in close contact. In the absence of negative allosteric regulation exerted by the FimHPD, isolated recombinant FimHLD is locked in the high-affinity state and is highly stable [19].

FimH is a key target for development of candidate vaccines to prevent UTI. The proposed primary mechanism of action of a FimH vaccine is inhibition of bacterial adhesion to urinary tract epithelial cells [23]. Immunization with recombinant FimHLD or full length FimH in complex with FimC (FimCH) is protective in both mouse and non-human primate models of UTI [2332]. Safety and immunogenicity of four doses of FimCH combined with a TLR4 adjuvant has been evaluated in humans in a Phase 1 study [33].

Development of FimH vaccines has been hindered significantly by two major issues: low yield of recombinant protein in E. coli and the requirement for multiple doses to elicit immune responses against E. coli [33,34]. In native E. coli, FimH is produced in the periplasm which facilitates disulfide bond formation [35]. Typical yields of recombinant FimH reported at lab-bench scale are 3-5 mg/L for the purified FimCH complex and 4-10 mg/L for FimHLD [18,19]; therefore, although the antigen has promise, inefficient bioprocessing in E. coli is an impediment to manufacturing. In the current study, a mammalian expression platform was developed which yields high quantities of correctly folded FimH, providing a path forward to manufacture sufficient quantities of FimH to enable large scale clinical trials.

To address the relatively poor immunogenicity of FimH, we used a structure-based design strategy to engineer FimH proteins predicted to exhibit superior immunogenicity (defined by ability of antibodies to block bacterial adhesion) compared to the wild type (WT) protein. It has been suggested that locking FimHLD in the low affinity, ‘open’ conformation, induces the production of antibodies that can inhibit adhesion [36,37]. Conformational stabilization of antigens has been successful in improving immunogenicity and stability for various viral vaccine antigen candidates including Respiratory Syncytial Virus F protein [3841]. Conformers can have quite different structures wherein the accessibility (or conformation) of epitopes in one conformer versus another differs [42]. Therefore, depending on which conformer is used for immunization, immune responses (quality, magnitude, specificity) can differ significantly. In this study, predicted conformationally stabilized FimH mutants were produced in mammalian cells and screened in a series of biochemical and biophysical assays followed by immunogenicity studies in mice. This screening approach led to the identification of a full length, donor strand-complemented FimH fusion antigen (FimH-donor-strand complemented with FimG peptide ‘triple mutant’) FimH-DSG TM, which can be produced at a large scale in mammalian cells without a chaperone. By X-ray crystallography, we confirmed that the FimHLD of this mutant was stabilized in an open conformation, similar to its native presentation on Type 1 pili.

To understand further the enhanced binding inhibition response elicited by immunization by FimH-DSG, we characterized a library of monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) raised against this protein that were able to inhibit bacterial adhesion. Through epitope binning and cryo-electron microscopy, four distinct binding sites of inhibitory antibodies were identified on FimHLD which reveal novel insights into mechanisms of inhibition by antibodies targeting FimH.

Results

Production of FimH in mammalian cells

The low yields of WT FimHLD or FimCH produced in E. coli (3-10 mg/L of bacterial culture) are well documented [18,19]. Given these challenges, we explored production of FimH using an Expi293 mammalian cell expression system (Fig 1A), wherein the protein is secreted into the cell culture medium using a eukaryotic signal peptide. Fusion of FimH to the mouse IgGκ signal peptide yielded protein that was correctly processed at the N-terminus (confirmed by mass spectrometry (Fig A in S1 Figs), also by X-ray crystallography described below). In contrast, use of the native FimH signal peptide resulted in a protein that was not correctly processed (Fig A in S1 Figs). Non-native N-linked glycosylation commonly occurs during heterologous expression of proteins in mammalian cells and can interfere with biological function as well as antigenicity of recombinant proteins. Non-native N-linked glycosylation on FimHLD at residues N7 and N70 was removed via mutation of target Asparagine residues to Serine, which was selected as a conservative substitution. WT and conformationally locked FimHLD (V27C L34C, described previously [19]), harboring N7S and N70S mutations to remove glycosylation, were expressed in 20 ml Expi293 cultures, which yielded 17 mg and 11 mg protein respectively.

thumbnail
Fig 1. FimHLD produced in mammalian cells has comparable biophysical properties to material produced in E. coli.

WT or conformation stabilized FimHLD were expressed in Expi293 cells along with mutants designed to remove non-native glycosylation on residues N7 and N70. (A) Batch purified proteins run on SDS-PAGE gel stained with Coomassie blue. C1 and C2 designate two clones of FimHLD N7Q V27C L34C N70S and FimHLD V27C L34C C1 that were evaluated for expression. (B). Near-UV CD spectra of FimHLD produced in E. coli and mammalian expression systems. Spectra of FimHLD WT (blue) and V27C L34C (red) are shown. (C) Affinity of WT and V27C L34C FimHLD produced in E. coli or mammalian cells for alpha-D-mannopyranoside by FP. (D) Thermal stability of WT and V27C L34C FimHLD produced in E. coli or mammalian cells. (E) Mouse study design: CD-1 mice were immunized 3 times with 10 µg FimH proteins with QS21 adjuvant. (F) Sera were analyzed for the ability to block FimH-expressing E. coli binding to yeast mannan; bars represent geometric mean IC50 and 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance (p-value) of differences in responses between groups was determined using an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction applied to log-transformed data; the bars and asterisk illustrate the significance of the difference in response for comparisons. Tabulated IC50 values are shown in Table A in S1 Text.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012325.g001

FimH LD produced in mammalian cells has comparable biophysical properties to material produced in E. coli

Mammalian and E. coli derived FimHLD WT and disulfide lock mutant V27C L34C were further characterized using biophysical and biochemical assays. The E. coli and mammalian derived FimHLD WT and mutant proteins had essentially identical near-UV circular dichroism (CD) spectra (Fig 1B), indicating that the respective tertiary structure of these conformationally distinct proteins is very similar. Ligand binding affinity was determined using a direct binding fluorescence polarization (FP) assay with a fluorescein-conjugated octylbiphenylmannopyranoside (BPMP) ligand as described previously [19,43]. E. coli and mammalian produced material bound BPMP ligand with similar affinity (Fig 1C); thermal stability, as determined by differential scanning calorimetry, was also comparable (Fig 1D).

Design of a full-length donor strand complemented FimH (FimH-DSG)

To mimic the presentation of FimH on the assembled fimbrial tip [20], and to understand the contribution of FimHPD in ability to elicit anti-FimH antibodies with the ability to prevent bacterial binding to mannose, we considered production of a full length FimH antigen. Full length FimH cannot be produced in E. coli without the chaperone FimC or as part of a pilus [16,19,44,45]. In previous studies in humans and non-human primates, full length FimH in complex with FimC was used as an immunogen [2325,33,34]. Whether the FimHPD is important for optimal immunogenicity is unknown, therefore the design of a full length FimH was explored to compare immunogenicity with that of FimHLD alone. Sauer et al previously produced a stable, isolated FimH molecule by displacing FimC in FimCH with a FimG donor strand peptide (FimG residues 1-14) [46]. This approach requires coexpression of FimH with the chaperone, FimC. In contrast, Barnhardt et al produced a stable, single chain FimG donor strand complemented FimH in E. coli using a 4-residue amino acid linker (DNKQ), enabling production of full length FimH without a chaperone [17]. The single chain concept was explored further in the current study. Donor-strand complemented, full-length FimH proteins (FimH-DSG) were produced by attaching a 14-mer donor strand peptide from FimG to the C-terminus of the FimHPD via a Glycine-Serine linker of various lengths, as well as the previously described DNKQ linker [17]. Flexible polypeptide linkers consisting of Glycine and Serine are often used in construction of multidomain proteins as these flexible and hydrophilic spacer sequences prevent formation of secondary structure between protein domains, reducing the possibility that linkers will interfere with the folding or function of the target protein [47]. Constructs were screened in mammalian cells and expression levels were similar, as assessed by SDS-PAGE (Fig B in S1 Figs). FimH-DSG with a 7-residue Glycine-Serine linker (GGSSGGG) was selected as optimal, based on structural analysis. Non-native glycosylation in FimHLD was prevented by incorporation of N7S and N70S mutations as described above and an additional mutation to Glutamine was also introduced at N228 in the FimHPD. Analysis by mass spectrometry confirmed that FimH-DSG retained a single glycosylation site at N235 in the exploratory antigen initially characterized in this study (Fig A in S1 Figs). Note, fully aglycosyl variants of FimH-DSG were subsequently generated following introduction of an additional mutation at N235 and expression in ExpiCHO cells (described in brief below).

The proposed mechanism of action of FimH-containing vaccines to prevent UTIs is via inhibition of bacterial binding to the urinary tract epithelium [25]. We developed a live, whole E. coli binding inhibition assay to quantify the ability of anti-FimH antibodies to prevent binding of fimbriated bacteria to a mannosylated yeast mannan surface (mimicking the mannosylated FimH receptor on the surface of bladder epithelial cells), based on previous work [48]. Using this assay, the relative ability of E. coli and mammalian derived FimH proteins to elicit inhibitory serum antibodies in mice was evaluated (Fig 1E and 1F). Inhibitory titers elicited by E. coli and mammalian derived WT FimHLD proteins in mice were equivalent, although the potency of the stabilized lock mutant FimHLD V27C L34C produced in mammalian cells was slightly lower than that of the E. coli produced FimHLD V27C L34C. Disulfide bond formation may differ in the periplasm of E. coli compared to the mammalian cytoplasm [49]. Inhibitory titers elicited by full length FimH proteins (FimH-DSG, only produced in mammalian cells) including the previously described FimCH protein [50] were markedly higher than FimHLD proteins in terms of percentage of responders and geometric mean IC50 values (Fig 1F and Table A in S1 Text).

Rational design of FimH variants stabilizing the low-affinity, open conformation

We employed in silico analysis to identify novel variants predicted to stabilize FimHLD in a low affinity conformation, which is unable to bind its cognate mannose receptor. Crystal structures of FimH in complex with fimbrial structural proteins in the absence of ligand or presence of D-mannose are shown in Fig 2A, illustrating the differences in FimHLD conformation. The crystal structure of full length FimH in complex with fimbrial structural proteins (PDB ID 3JWN (20)) was used as a model. Suggested amino acid substitutions identified from this analysis were introduced into either FimHLD or FimH-DSG (Fig 2B), harboring the same mutations to prevent glycosylation described above (N7S, N70S in FimHLD and N7S, N70S and N228Q in FimH-DSG). To stabilize FimHLD in an open conformation, the following design strategies were applied: 1) nonpolar residues exposed to solvent in the pre-bound state but buried within the protein interior in the bound structure were mutated to polar or charged residues, disfavoring the high-affinity, closed conformation of FimHLD; 2) disulfide linkages were introduced between residue pairs in close proximity in the pre-bound state, but not in the bound conformation; 3) mutation of glycine residues having a backbone ϕ-angle < 0° in the pre-bound state but > 0° in the bound structure to prevent closure of the ligand binding site; 4) a full length, single chain FimH-DSG was designed (described above); and 5) cavity filling mutations designed to stabilize the interface between FimHPD and FimHLD were introduced separately into full length FimH-DSG. An alignment of all FimH mutants that were evaluated, in comparison to wild type FimH sequence from J96, is provided in S1 File.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Rational design of FimH mutations stabilizing the native state.

(A) Structures of FimH in unbound form (PDB structure 3JWN) and bound to mannoside ligand (PDB structure 1KLF). In pili, unbound FimH (left), complexed with the donor strand of FimG, adopts a compact conformation that binds the FimH cognate receptor, the terminal mannose moiety of glycosylated proteins, with low affinity. Upon binding a mannose moiety (right), the FimHLD and FimHPD separate, sidechains (colored in green) flip from protein interior to surface, and backbones of Gly residues (colored in blue) exhibit large conformational changes. Residues shown in blue and green were targeted for mutagenesis. (B) Strategies employed to stabilize FimH conformation. Unbound (grey) and bound (green) full length FimH structures with residues targeted by mutagenesis are highlighted.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012325.g002

Screening of FimH LD and FimH-DSG mutants in in vitro assays

Sixty-four mutant and WT versions of FimHLD and FimH-DSG proteins were expressed in Expi293 cells as described above. Purified proteins were evaluated in a series of in vitro and in vivo studies (Fig 3A). Mutants that were expressed at low levels were excluded from further evaluation. Binding affinities (Kd) of FimH mutants for mannoside ligand were determined by FP assay using BPMP as described above. Kd values for a subset of FimHLD and FimH-DSG mutants relative to WT are shown in Fig 3B (data for additional mutants can be found in Table B in S1 Table). The sequence of FimHLD WT is derived from E. coli UTI isolate J96 [51]. V27A is a natural variant that is associated with virulent UTI isolates and those associated with Crohn’s Disease [11,52]. Introduction of the single point mutant V27A did not alter mannoside ligand binding affinity relative to FimHLD WT, while combining single or double glycine loop mutations at G15 or G16 positions with V27A significantly impaired ligand binding (Table B in S1 Table). Ligand binding was completely lost in the triple mutant, FimHLD G15A G16A V27A (FimHLD TM, Kd > 2000 nM). Ligand binding affinity of FimH-DSG WT was reduced more than 100-fold compared to FimHLD WT, in agreement with the allosteric role of the pilin domain in regulating ligand binding by the lectin-binding domain. FimH-DSG V27A also had a two-fold lower ligand-binding affinity, compared to FimH-DSG WT (S2 Table B in S1 Table). This is consistent with previous data showing that a FimH mutant containing A27 has the propensity to adopt a less-active state that binds mannose with low affinity [11]. Like FimHLD, FimH-DSG mutants containing V27A and Glycine loop mutations have substantially reduced ligand binding activity. Altogether, our data suggest that the flexible Glycine loop plays a stabilizing role in ligand binding. Mutations in this loop result in FimH adhesins with poor affinity for the synthetic BPMP ligand used as representative of cognate mannosylated host cell glycoprotein receptors.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Identification of FimH mutants with improved thermal stability and reduced mannoside ligand affinity.

(A) 64 FimH variants were screened in vitro for ability to bind mannose, thermal stability, and conformation. A subset of constructs was screened for immunogenicity in mice. (B-C) Biochemical characterization of purified FimHLD and FimH-DSG mutants. (B) relative average binding affinities of FimH mutants to mannoside ligand. Note, the assay limit of detection was ~2000 nM. (C) filled circles display average melting temperatures of each mutant. Open circles denote melting temperature of FimH protein in the presence of mannoside ligand. Tabulated Kd and Tm values for all mutants are in Tables B and C in S1 Text s respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012325.g003

To further evaluate ligand binding abilities of FimH variants, a SYPRO orange-based differential scanning fluorimetry assay was used [19]. The temperature at which 50% of the protein is unfolded (Tm) was determined for all mutants in apo state as well as in the presence of methyl alpha-D-mannopyranoside, a derivative of alpha-D-mannose that binds to FimH with micromolar affinity [53]. The Tm of apo protein and its corresponding Tm shift (∆Tm) in ligand bound condition are summarized in Table C in S1 Table. FimH-DSG WT proteins exhibited significantly higher Tm (71.3 ºC) compared to FimHLD WT (61.5 ºC). Tm shifts of the FimH mutant proteins from apo to mannoside ligand bound conditions are in concordance with the changes seen in mannoside ligand Kd measurement (Fig 3B and Table B in S1 Table). Of note, consistent with published data the V27C L34C disulfide lock mutant [19] exhibited significantly lower thermostability (Tm) compared to FimHLD and FimH-DSG WT proteins, while retaining mannoside ligand binding activity (Kd of 30-60 nM). In contrast, combinatory mutations containing V27A and Glycine loop mutations at G15 and G16 positions resulted in FimH mutants that retained thermostability while losing their ability to bind mannoside ligand (Kd >2000 nM). Together with our binding affinity data, these data suggest that combining V27A and Glycine loop mutations stabilizes FimH proteins in a low affinity state that is largely incapable of ligand binding.

In previous work, WT and conformationally locked FimHLD mutants were found to have distinct tertiary structures [19]. The secondary and tertiary structures of selected FimHLD and FimH-DSG proteins were therefore examined by CD (Fig C in S1 Figs). The far-UV CD spectrum (secondary structure) of FimHLD WT expressed in mammalian cells is consistent with previously published data. Overall, the secondary structures of the FimHLD or FimH-DSG mutants are highly similar to WT proteins (Fig C in S1 Figs), suggesting that the overall secondary structure is not altered in these mutants. The near-UV CD spectra (tertiary structure) of most FimHLD mutants except for V27A (Fig C in S1 Figs), however, were quite different from that of FimHLD WT and are more similar to the previously reported FimHLD V27C L34C and V27A R60P mutants which assume an open conformational state [19]. On the other hand, all FimH-DSG proteins including WT and the V27A, G15A, G16A triple mutant (or TM) had highly similar secondary and tertiary structures, resembling the open state of FimHLD (Fig C in S1 Figs). Overall, the CD characterization is consistent with mannoside ligand binding data described above, which suggests these mutants are stabilized in an open conformation that has low mannose binding affinity.

Together, these data suggest that the Glycine loop mutations constrain FimHLD in an open conformation, while the FimH-DSG constructs including the corresponding reference WT variant, remain in a conformation that remains unchanged upon introduction of stabilizing mutations that eliminate ligand binding.

FimH-DSG mutants induce antibodies with superior ability to inhibit bacterial binding than FimH LD mutants in mice

To evaluate the relative ability of selected FimH mutants to elicit inhibitory antibodies, mice were vaccinated with each mutant protein and the collected sera were used to assess the ability to prevent bacterial binding in vitro. Mice were immunized three times with 10 µg FimH protein combined with QS21 adjuvant (Fig 4A) and sera from post dose 2 and 3 time points were evaluated in the yeast mannan E. coli binding inhibition assay described above (Fig 4B and Table D in S1 Text).

thumbnail
Fig 4. FimH-DSG mutants induce antibodies with superior ability to inhibit bacterial binding compared to FimHLD mutants in mice.

(A) CD-1 mice were immunized 3 times with 10 µg FimH with QS21 adjuvant. Sera were analyzed for the ability to block FimH-expressing E. coli binding to yeast mannan. (B) Inhibitory titers were determined from serial dilution of sera from vaccinated mice and represent the reciprocal of the dilution of serum at which 50% of bacteria remain bound to the plate and are shown for post dose 2 and post dose 3 timepoints. Statistical significance (p-value) of differences in responses between groups was determined using an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction applied to log-transformed data; the bars and asterisk illustrate the significance of the difference in response between groups. Tabulated IC50 values are shown in Table D in S1 Text.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012325.g004

At post dose 3, mice immunized with novel stabilized FimHLD mutants G15A G16A V27A, G16A V27A, and the previously described mutant V27A R60P [19] had higher responder rates and increased binding inhibition (p <0.05) compared to FimHLD WT (Fig 4B and Table D in S1 Text). Other FimHLD mutants (G15A V27A, G16P V27A, V28C N33C) did not significantly enhance functional immunogenicity of FimHLD. Thus, several mutants designed to enhance functional immunogenicity of FimHLD by constraining FimHLD in an open conformation led to improved responses relative to FimHLD WT, confirming previous findings [54]. Following vaccination with 2 doses of FimHLD and FimH-DSG proteins, significantly more animals yielded inhibitory titers in the groups vaccinated with FimH-DSG compared to FimHLD (Fig 4B and Table D in S1 Text). This trend was sustained at PD3, where 95%-100% of mice responded in groups vaccinated with FimH-DSG V27A, FimH-DSG G15A V27A or FimH-DSG G15A G16A V27A (henceforth FimH-DSG TM) and tended to have higher GMC IC50 values relative to FimHLD mutants (p<0.05) (Fig 4B and Table D in S1 Text). In conclusion, FimH-DSG mutants elicit higher inhibitory antibody responses compared to FimHLD mutants.

The ability of FimH-DSG V27A, G15A V27A double mutant and FimH-DSG TM to elicit inhibitory antibodies were similar. However, during large scale purification of FimH-DSG WT and TM from ExpiCHO cells for further characterization, a tendency for aggregation was observed for FimH-DSG WT and characterization by analytical size exclusion chromatography revealed the presence of high molecular weight complexes (Fig E in S1 Figs). We hypothesized that during CHO fermentation, and upon secretion into the culture media, the FimH-DSG WT binds glycan molecule(s) released from the surface of the host CHO cells. To evaluate this further, samples were analyzed by High pH Anion-Exchange Chromatography with Pulsed Amperometric (electrochemical) Detection (HPAEC-PAD). FimH-DSG WT preparations contained numerous monosaccharides (Fig E in S1 Figs). In contrast, FimH-DSG TM was bound to comparatively fewer glycan moieties (Fig E in S1 Figs). Furthermore, it is entirely possible that the low monosaccharide content that was detected represents sugar moieties of the N-glycan present on N235. FimH-DSG TM did not tend to aggregate or form high molecular weight complexes. Therefore, as it can be purified to homogeneity, at a high yield, we used this mutant for our subsequent studies.

Production of aglycosylated FimH-DSG TM

Removal of the N-glycan present on residue N235 of FimH-DSG TM led to additional glycosylation on residue N228. To avoid these issues, we explored removal of glycosylation by introducing the following combinations of mutations: N228S N235S, T230A T237A, N228G N235G, and N228Q N235Q. Proteins were expressed transiently in 2L ExpiCHO cell cultures and yields were between 69 mg (N228G N235G) and 311 mg (N228S N235S). Aglycosylation mutations did not impact the ability of inhibitory Mabs to bind relative to glycosylated FimH-DSG TM (S5 Table), and the capability of aglycosylated variants elicit adhesin blocking antibodies does not appear to differ from the glycosylated parent (Fig D in S1 Figs). An alignment of FimH-DSG TM and aglycosylation mutants, along with other FimH sequences used in this study, is shown in S1 File.

Structural characterization of FimH-DSG TM by X-ray crystallography

Among all conformationally stabilized FimH-DSG mutants, FimH-DSG TM was of most interest as it harbors the two Glycine loop mutations G15A and G16A designed to conformationally lock the mannose site in the ‘open’ state. To verify the conformation of FimH-DSG TM, the crystal structure of a FimH-DSG TM protein containing three glycosylation site mutations (N7S, N70S, and N228Q) was solved by X-ray crystallography at 1.9 Å resolution (Fig 5A and Table F in S1 Text). There are four molecules of FimH-DSG TM in one asymmetric unit which share high similarity, therefore, structural analysis was done with protomer A. Introduction of the glycosylation site mutations did not appear to alter either the local or global conformations of the FimHLD and FimHPD. Comparison of the structure to previously determined structures of FimHLD confirmed that FimH-DSG TM lectin domain adopts a compressed structure with an open mannose-binding pocket (Fig 5C). Clear electron density was obtained for the Glycine loop, wherein the G15A G16A mutations were introduced which induced a local change in the loop conformation (Fig 5B and 5C). A15 projects towards the inside region of the clamp loop, providing rigidity, which causes the loop to widen at the end by ~1.2 Å (I13 Cα-S17 Cα) compared to the WT residue (G15), thus stabilizing the low affinity state. Additional rigidity is introduced by the G16A substitution, as it projects towards the bulk solvent. By comparison, these residues adopt very different conformations in the closed, high-affinity state [55]. The overall structure of FimH-DSG TM resembles the low affinity conformation of FimHLD (Fig 5D) [16,18,]. In comparison to previously published structures, the donor strand complemented FimHPD did not exhibit any conformational changes. The backbone of the exogeneous 7-residue Glycine-Serine linker that connects the FimH and FimG peptide could largely be resolved, and does not impact the conformation of the lectin or pilin domains in comparison to previously published structures (Fig F in S1 Figs) [18].

thumbnail
Fig 5. The lectin domain of FimH-DSG TM adopts an open conformation.

(A) Overall structure of FimH-DSG TM from x-ray crystallography data (PDB code 8V3J). (B) Superimposition of ligand binding sites of FimH-DSG TM (orange) and WT FimH from a previously published structure of native pili (PDB code 3JWN, light grey) shows remodeling of the Glycine loop due to G15A G16A mutations. The widening of the loop between Ile13 Ca-Ser17 Ca is shown in a dotted line. (C) Electron density and atomic model of Glycine loop in FimH-DSG TM. (D) Superimposition of FimH-DSG TM (orange), WT FimH in apo (PDB code 3JWN, light grey) and trimannose-bound (PDB code 6GTV, slate) forms shows that the ligand binding site of FimH-DSG TM adopts an open conformation resembling the apo state but not the ligand-bound, closed conformation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012325.g005

Inhibitory antibodies elicited by FimH-DSG map to novel epitopes

As described above, FimH-DSG WT and derived mutants induced superior inhibitory antibody responses in mice compared to equivalent FimHLD variants. To further characterize inhibitory antibodies induced by FimH-DSG, monoclonal anti-FimH antibodies were developed and screened by the yeast mannan E. coli binding inhibition assay, which resulted in the identification of 10 unique clones (Table G in S1 Text).

A series of competition experiments using Bio-layer interferometry (BLI) was undertaken to facilitate Mab classification and epitope mapping. As comparators, two previously described inhibitory Mabs, 475 and 926, which bind to overlapping epitopes on the ligand binding interface, were included [48,54]. An octyl amino mannopyranoside compound was selected as the synthetic ligand for these experiments as it is expected to have a higher affinity for FimH than shorter chain alkyl α-D-mannosides [53,56], and a crystal structure of the related octyl carboxy mannopyranoside in complex with FimH in complex is available [57]. BLI experiments were performed with and without octylmannopyranoside ligand, to assess whether there is competition between the ligand and Mab binding to FimHLD (Fig G in S1 Figs and Table G in S1 Text), and ability of antibodies to bind FimHLD and FimH-DSG mutants (Table H and Table I in S1 Text). These experiments identified four distinct inhibitory epitopes. Site 1 was recognized by 6 novel Mabs, as well as reference Mabs 926 and 475, which effectively block ligand binding. Three antibodies were unable to block ligand binding and bound to two distinct epitopes (site 2 and site 3, Mabs 327-3 and 329-2, and 445-3 respectively). Site 4 was recognized by a single Mab (440-2) that bound exclusively to conformation-stabilized FimHLD. Note, this Mab was derived from mice immunized with the conformationally locked construct, FimH-DSG V27C L34C. Individual Mab binding kinetics are shown in Table G in S1 Text alongside their inhibitory concentrations in the E. coli binding inhibition assay.

Fab fragments derived from representative antibodies from each new site (329-2 (site 2), 445-3 (site 3) and 440-2 (site 4)) were selected as representatives for subsequent epitope mapping by cryo-EM. The small size of FimH was an impediment to high resolution structural analysis of FimH-Fab binary complexes, which yielded only low-resolution structures that could not be modeled. To circumvent this limitation, a combinatorial approach was taken in which pairs of Fabs with non-overlapping epitopes were combined with FimH to form ternary complexes, increasing the overall particle mass to 125 kDa. Using this ternary complex strategy, a cryo-EM structure of FimH-DSG TM with Fabs 329-2 and 445-3 was determined at 3.11 Å (Figs 6A and Fig H in S1, S8 Figs, and Table J in S1 Text), with the final map comprising FimHLD and the antigen-binding portions of each Fab, allowing molecular modeling of each component and identification of the molecular details of the respective epitopes. The two Fabs were distinguished in part by comparison of their sequences to the corresponding side chain density in the map, but to build additional confidence, the structure of an overlapping FimH-DSG TM-Fab ternary complex, in which the 329-2 Fab was replaced with 440-2, was determined by cryo-EM (Figs 6B and Fig I in S1 Figs, and Table J in S1 Text). The new map from a 4.2 Å reconstruction enabled building of Fabs 440-2 and 445-3, providing confidence in the Fab assignments and epitope definitions, and allowed mapping of the remaining 440-2 epitope. Surprisingly, Mab 440-2 binds to the tip of FimHLD, which covers the mannose binding site and largely overlaps with the known site 1. Binding of Mab 440-2 (site 4) therefore directly competes with mannose binding, conveying an orthosteric inhibition mechanism for blocking of bacterial adhesion, like that observed for the competitive Mab 475(48). However, being derived from a conformationally locked FimH-DSG mutant antigen distinguishes Mab 440-2 from the other inhibitory Mabs. Mab 440-2 preferentially binds to the low affinity open state of FimHLD, but not WT FimHLD (Table H in S1 Text), suggesting that it uses a novel inhibitory mechanism. Indeed, the structure of the ligand binding site of 440-2-bound FimHLD matches the open conformation, largely distinct from the observed conformation in the ligand bound high-affinity ‘closed’ state (Fig 7A).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Identification of novel inhibitory epitopes on FimH-DSG TM.

(A) Structure of FimH-DSG TM in complex with 329-2 and 445-3 Fabs solved by cryo-EM. Top image shows the cryo-EM map, colored by chain, as indicated. Insets show respective epitope interfaces, with each Fab shown in transparent surface representation and FimH in cartoon representation, with residues contributing to each epitope surface shown in stick representation (alpha carbons are represented by transparent spheres). (B) CryoEM structure of FimH-DSG TM in complex with 440-2 and 445-3 Fabs, colored by chain, as indicated. Inset shows the epitope interface, with the Fab shown in transparent surface representation and FimH in cartoon representation, with residues contributing to each epitope surface shown in stick representation (alpha carbons are represented by transparent spheres). (C) Sequence of FimH (with stabilizing mutations underlined) with residues contributing to each Fab’s epitope highlighted and colored by their respective Fabs as in A and B. (D) Cartoon representation of the FimHLD in the FimH-DSG TM crystal structure. Epitopes identified in this study and in previous work by others (Mab 926, 824, 475 and 21) are highlighted, with participating residues shown as spheres and colored as indicated. Numbered gray residues indicate coincidence between two epitopes (1 = Mab 926 and Mab 475, 2 = Mab 926 and Mab 445-3, 3 = Mab 475 and Mab 824, 4 = Mab 440-2 and Mab 926).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012325.g006

thumbnail
Fig 7. Structural basis of inhibitory mechanisms of different Mabs.

(A) Superimposition of FimH WT bound to trimannose (PDB code 6GTV, blue) and FimH-DSG TM (orange) cryo-EM structure resolved from the complex with Fabs of 440-2 (green surface) and 445-3 (not shown). (B) Superimposition of FimH WT bound to trimannose (PDB code 6GTV, blue) and FimH-DSG TM (orange) cryo-EM structure resolved from the complex with Fabs of 329-2 (purple) and 445-3 (dark blue). Surface representations for the two Fabs are shown. Side chains from FimH-DSG TM that are part of the Mab epitopes are shown in stick format. In (A) and (B), shift of the clamp loop and Glycine loop from FimH-DSG TM to mannose-bound FimH WT is highlighted by dashed lines. Conformations of the important FimH epitope loops for 440-2, 329-2, and 445-3 binding are shown as orange (FimH-DSG TM structure) and blue (FimH WT-mannose bound structure) lines.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012325.g007

Epitopes of Mabs 329-2 (site 2) and 445-3 (site 3) were mapped to the opposite sides of FimHLD. Despite not overlapping with ligand binding pocket, the 329-2 and 445-3 epitopes are composed of residues in adjacent regions with conformations that change significantly during the switch between inactive and active states. In particular, Mab 329-2 recognizes a novel inhibitory epitope comprised of residues T5, S7, T9, A10, Y21 and N23. These residues are connected to the Glycine loop that harbors the G15A and G16A mutations. As a result, binding of Mab 329-2 stabilizes the Glycine loop in the open conformation that has low mannose affinity (Fig 7B). Binding to the other side of FimHLD, Mab 445-3 interacts with residues including R132, T134, S139, D140 and D141 from the clamp loop in its open conformation, which shifts 4.4 Å away from the compact-mannose-bound conformation seen in the closed form (PDB ID 6GTV, Fig 6B). In addition, S80, S81, Y82 and P91 were also mapped to 445-3 binding site. These residues were revealed in previous work as being part of a critical epitope for Mab 824, an inhibitory antibody that allosterically prevents transitions of FimH from low-affinity to high-affinity states [58]. Taken together, Mab 445-3 likely blocks bacterial adhesion via a combinatory allosteric mechanism which modulates both the global state transition as well as the local ligand binding site. These new epitopes described herein (mapped onto the FimH-DSG TM sequence in Fig 6C), along with previously identified FimH Mab epitopes are highlighted on the structure of FimH-DSG TM in Fig 6D.

Of note, none of the binding sites identified for these three Fabs overlap with the conformation stabilizing mutations introduced into the FimH-DSG TM vaccine candidate (S2 File). In addition, the residues of the mapped epitopes exhibit little to no variation across UTI isolates (S2 File). Collectively, these results broaden the repertoire of FimHLD functional epitopes, highlighting the diverse interference mechanisms by which antibodies contribute to FimH vaccine efficacy.

Discussion

FimH is a key target for UTI vaccines due to its integral role in UPEC virulence. Clinical trials have yet to demonstrate efficacy of FimH vaccination in humans in Phase 2 or Phase 3 studies, although an exploratory analysis of subjects vaccinated with a FimCH vaccine in a Phase 1 study found that subjects had fewer recurrent UTI episodes [33], which was long term in some patients [59]. As there are issues with scalable production and poor immunogenicity documented in previous studies, we sought to optimize FimH antigen design and how it is bioprocessed to improve its application for therapeutic use.

Firstly, we developed a mammalian expression system to produce FimH antigens. In contrast to classic osmotic shock approaches that release functional FimH from the E. coli periplasm, the mammalian expression platform dramatically increases yield and simplifies the purification process. Notably, FimH antigens produced in mammalian cells are structurally and antigenically alike to the analogous proteins produced in E. coli. Our approach provides a path forward for manufacture of FimH antigens in large quantities for clinical trials and may be applicable to other complementary fimbrial vaccine antigens, that are similarly expressed at low levels in E. coli.

Computational design has been used successfully to optimize vaccine antigens for improved stability, immunogenicity [60,61] as well as safety [60,62,63]. The design of conformationally stabilized proteins to improve neutralizing responses was pioneered in the field of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) research [38] and has been employed for COVID-19 [39], HIV [40], influenza [41], and malaria vaccines [64]. In agreement with previous reports [54], our rational approach to engineering structurallyconstrained FimH mutants led to identification of a conformation-stabilized full-length FimH variant (FimH-DSG TM) that elicits superior bacterial binding inhibition when compared to WT or conformation-stabilized mutants of FimHLD. FimHPD is thought to act as an allosteric inhibitor of the FimHLDand interaction of FimHLD with FimHPD in full length FimH stabilizes the FimHLD in the low-affinity state [65]. Similarly, full length FimH-DSG TM is stabilized in the low affinity state (Fig 5). As no inhibitory Mabs were found to bind FimHPD in screening of FimH Mabs, the FimHPD thus likely contributes to the ability of FimH-DSG to elicit higher inhibitory antibody titers compared to FimHLD mutants, via stabilization of the FimHLD conformation. We hypothesize that this effect is due to exposure of binding pocket epitopes in the open conformation, enabling targeted antibody development against prebound FimH. Like other allosteric proteins, FimH can adopt different conformations, which, in turn, can affect accessibility and structure of functional (inhibitory) epitopes. Thus, different FimHLD conformations may be antigenically distinct, and induce immune responses that differ in specificity or inhibitory function. This is well-documented for several viral proteins, including RSV fusion protein F: immunization with the prefusion-stabilized conformer induces a more potent neutralizing antibody responses, unlike the responses induced by the postfusion form [38]. Similar observations have been made for SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein [66] and HIV-1 envelope protein [67].

Characterization of inhibitory Mabs elicited by FimH-DSG by epitope binning and cryo-EM revealed three non-overlapping epitopes present on FimHLD; indicating that inhibitory antibodies targeting FimH-DSG TM can act via more than one mechanism. Based on the characterization of antibodies raised against FimHLD, three types of FimH inhibitory antibodies are described in the literature [48,65]: orthosteric (where an antibody replaces ligand in the binding site), parasteric (where an antibody binds adjacent to ligand in the binding site), or dynasteric (where the antibody binds at an allosteric site distant to the ligand binding site, preventing a conformational switch). The analysis described herein mapped antibodies to the ligand binding site (site 1), as described previously, and three novel sites (sites 2, 3 and 4) that represent alternative novel allosteric mechanisms by which FimH directed antibodies can inhibit binding.

In addition to the improvements in immunogenicity, as measured by the bacterial inhibition assay, and induction of antibodies against novel inhibitory epitopes, the single chain FimH-DSG TM antigen presented herein offers several advantages over existing FimH protein vaccine candidates. Production of FimH-DSG in mammalian cells yielded high levels of protein, which induced potent inhibitory titers in sera from immunized mice. FimH-DSG mimics the natural presentation of FimH in the context of the assembled pilus, without the need for a chaperone, resulting in a targeted immune response. It is likely to provide broad coverage across FimH sequences found in nature (S2 File). Introduction of the three stabilizing mutations (G15A G16A V27A) enabled purification of FimH-DSG TM to homogeneity without copurification of contaminating glycans compared to WT FimH-DSG. The ability to express a fimbrial adhesin in mammalian cells at high yield, to homogeneity, in a form able to inhibit bacterial binding, represents a key advancement in the production of fimbrial antigens for effective vaccine development.

A limitation of this work is that the prioritization of FimH mutants in this study was based on a binding inhibition assay. We did not evaluate cellular responses or compare the mutants in an animal UTI efficacy model of UTI. While much of our understanding of E. coli UTI is based on mouse models of UTI, there are key limitations to the use of mouse models including differences in adhesin expression and requirement for a high infectious dose to establish a persistent UTI infection (discussed further elsewhere [10]). For this reason, we developed a UTI model in non-human primates, in which vaccination with FimH-DSG TM reduced biomarkers of UTI [68]. While it is not feasible to utilize non-human primates for screening studies, Chorro et al demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between FimH serum binding inhibition assay titers (or FimH urine IgG antibodies) and a reduction in biomarkers of UTI [68]. Ultimately, clinical vaccine efficacy studies will be required to identify relevant assay correlates of protection and associated mechanisms of protection for UPEC-caused UTIs.

Conclusion

UTIs are a common problem and a primary source of sepsis in the immunocompromised and elderly [69]. Antibiotics are currently the only approved treatment for UTIs, but long-term side effects (particularly in the context of recurrent UTIs) and emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains pose significant challenges to this approach. A vaccine which can decrease UTI may ultimately decrease rates of hospitalization and sepsis-associated morbidity and mortality, as well as antibiotic-resistant infections. Sublingual mucosal vaccines (e.g., Uromune) that contain whole-cell, inactivated bacteria show signs of effectiveness against recurrent infections [70,71]. The fundamental difference in the mechanism of action of whole-cell vaccines compared to parenteral vaccines (such as the FimH subunit vaccine described herein), and differences in dosing and route of administration (oral or intramuscular), preclude meaningful comparison of whole-cell vaccine performance to that of parenteral vaccines at least preclinically.

The optimized, full length FimH antigen described in this study can be produced at scale in mammalian cells and induces potent inhibitory antibodies with mechanistically distinct functional epitopes. In follow-on work, the ability of FimH-DSG TM to protect against UTIs caused by FimH-expressing E. coli was evaluated in a non-human primate (NHP) model [68]. Immunization of NHPs with FimH-DSG TM combined with a liposomal QS21/MPLA adjuvant elicited high levels of serum FimH IgG and adhesin blocking antibodies and led to a significant reduction in bacteriuria as well as biomarkers of UTI post-challenge (e.g., IL-8, myeloperoxidase). In addition, total anti-FimH IgG in the urine and binding inhibitory antibodies in the serum correlated with protection against disease. Thus, FimH-DSG TM is a promising candidate for further evaluation in human trials.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Mouse immunogenicity studies were performed at Pfizer, Pearl River, NY, which is accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC). All procedures performed on mice were in accordance with local regulations and established guidelines and were reviewed and approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). The work was in accordance with United States Department of Agriculture Animal Welfare Act and Regulations and the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules, and Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories.

Experimental design

This work aimed to develop a E. coli vaccine candidate by applying a computational and experimental design strategy to enhance the stability of the FimH lectin binding domain (FimHLD) and single chain full length FimH (FimH-DSG). Mutations were designed to introduce amino acid substitutions in FimHLD to stabilize the protein conformation in a low affinity state. FimHLD and FimH-DSG mutants were expressed in mammalian cells and purified mutant proteins were characterized by thermal stability and rate of dissociation, in comparison to wild type FimHLD. The crystal structure of FimH-DSG G15A G16A V27A (FimH-DSG TM) was resolved to confirm the mutant’s open conformation. Monoclonal antibodies raised against FimH-DSG were evaluated in competition experiments to group into non-overlapping epitope bins. Representatives of each distinct bin were complexed with FimH-DSG TM and analyzed by Cryo-EM to determine epitopes.

Expression and purification of WT FimH LD from E. coli

DNA encoding J96 FimHLD sequence was cloned into a pET28 vector and E. coli BL21(DE3) cells were transformed with the resulting construct. Expression, extraction and purification of FimHLD or FimCH from the E. coli periplasm was performed as previously described [50,72].

Expression and purification of WT FimH and mutants in mammalian cells

DNA encoding J96 FimH sequence and conformation-stabilized mutants was codon optimized for mammalian cells and cloned in frame behind sequence encoding mouse IgGκ or native FimH signal peptide, along with a C-terminal 8xHis tag in pcDNA3.1(+). FimCH was expressed from a pBudCE4.1 plasmid containing a CMV promoter to drive expression of FimC with a C-terminal 8xHis tag and a second promoter, EF1α, to drive expression of untagged FimH. For biochemical assays and mouse immunogenicity studies, endotoxin-free DNA was transiently transfected into Expi293 cells (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Supernatants were filtered through a 0.22 µm filter unit (Nalgene sterile disposable filter with PES membranes, ThermoFisher Scientific). Nickel Sepharose excel (Cytiva) was incubated with supernatants overnight at 4ºC and purification was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions. The eluate was loaded onto a S200 16/600 column in 50 mM TrisHCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl. Fractions containing pure protein were pooled.

For X-ray crystallography and cryoEM, FimH-DSG TM was produced in ExpiCHO cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The purification procedure is described in S1 Text.

Computational design of FimH mutants stabilizing the native state

The crystal structure of native full length FimH in complex with fimbrial structural proteins (PDB ID 3JWN) was used as a model for the low-affinity, open conformation. The crystal structure of FimHLD in complex with butyl α-D-mannoside was used as a model for the high-affinity, closed conformation (PDB 1UWF). Schrodinger BioLuminate (release 2017–2) was applied to analyze structural differences between the two states and to identify residue locations for mutations. Nonpolar residues that are exposed to solvent in the pre-bound structure and buried in the bound state were changed to polar or charged residues. Residue pairs selected for mutations to cysteine to form disulfide bonds that stabilize the native state were proximate (Cβ-Cβ ≤ 5 Å) in the pre-bound state and distant (Cβ-Cβ ³ 10 Å) in the bound conformation. Gly residues that have a negative backbone ϕ-angle in the pre-bound state and a positive backbone ϕ-angle in the bound state were mutated to Ala or Pro. An optimal Gly-Ser linker to connect the C-terminus of FimH and the N-terminus of FimG was identified using the Linker Modeler implemented in Molecular Operating Environment (MOE v2018, Chemical Computing Group).

Characterization of WT and mutant FimH proteins

WT and mutant FimH proteins were characterized by fluorescence polarization, circular dichroism and differential scanning fluorimetry modified from Rabbani et al [19] and are described in the S1 Text.

Antigenicity assay

Inhibitory Mabs 299-3, 304-1 and 440-2 (developed in-house) were used to confirm the conformational state of FimH mutants; 299-3 and 304-1 bind to similar epitopes as reference Mab 475 and 926 [37,48] while 440-2 recognizes a different epitope and appears to preferentially bind FimHLD in an open conformational state. Mutants that maintain the same structure as WT FimHLD are expected to bind all antibodies. Octet HTX from ForteBio was used for all the kinetic real-time biomolecular interaction experiments to measure antibody reactivity with each mutant. Experiments were carried out at 30 °C with 1000 rpm agitation in 96-well black plates containing 240 µl per well. Ni-NTA biosensors were equilibrated in buffer containing 1x PBS buffer containing 0.5% BSA and 0.05% Tween 20 (PBT) before allowing them to load his-tagged FimH mutant proteins at 5 µg/ml for 5 min. FimH loaded biosensors were allowed to reestablish baseline in PBT for 3 min before allowing them to associate with antibodies from different bins at 5 µg/ml for 5 min. Octet data analysis software was used for kinetic analysis of association step and obtain response in nm shift (tabulated).

FimH whole cell binding inhibition assays

CFT073 (ATCC) was serially passaged in 10 ml of Luria Bertani broth in static growth conditions at 37°C to enrich for FimH expression. Surface expression reaching ≥95% was confirmed via flow cytometry using anti-FimH Mab 926 [48]. Prior to the assay, 384 well white Maxisorp plates (Nunc) were coated with 20 µg/ml of yeast mannan (Sigma-Aldrich) and blocked in 1% BSA (Thermo). FimH-expressing E. coli cells (confirmed by flow cytometry using an anti-FimH antibody) were then incubated with a titration of vaccinated mouse sera and controls. Sera were diluted in PBS + 0.1% BSA and titrated 2.5-fold for 7 points, starting at 1:100. After 45 minutes at 37 ⁰C, the mixture was added to the plate and incubated for 45 minutes at 37⁰C before washing away any unbound cells. A titration of anti-FimHLD rabbit sera was used as an internal control on every plate. Specificity of bacterial binding to mannan was established by the inclusion of Methyl α-D-mannopyranoside (Sigma) as a negative control, which reduced binding by >95% at 50 mM levels. Adherent cells were measured with a luminescent probe BacTiter Glo (Promega) and read on a Clariostar Plus plate reader. IC50 inhibition values were interpolated using sigmoidal dose response variable-slope curve fitting (Graphpad Prism). Titers are the reciprocal of the serum dilution at which half-maximal inhibition is observed. Responders were defined as those with ≥50% inhibition at the starting dilution, had a defined IC50, a positive hillslope, r2 ≥0.80 and at least two points trending towards binding inhibition. The limit of detection (LOD) is designated as a dilution of 50, which is half of the maximum dilution. The statistical significance (p-value) of differences in responses between groups was determined using an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction applied to log-transformed data.

An alternative version of the assay was used for only Fig 1 and involved detection using a directly labelled anti-O25b-AF488 antibody and an O25b clinical E. coli isolate PFEEC0547 (collected as part of the ATLAS surveillance program).

Animal studies

Animal studies were conducted according to Pfizer local and global Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines at an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) International-accredited facility.

FimH murine immunogenicity studies

6–8-week-old female CD-1 mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories. For each group of mice, 20 animals were immunized three times subcutaneously with 10 µg FimH protein mixed with 20 µg Quillaja Saponaria-21 (QS-21) from a 5.1 mg/ ml QS-21 stock solution containing 5 mM Succinate, 60 mM NaCl, 0.1% PS80, pH 5.6. Mice were bled 2 weeks following immunization. Blood was withdrawn in 3.5-mL serum tubes at each time point and spun in a centrifuge at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. The serum fractions were collected and stored in cryovials.

Anti-FimH Monoclonal antibody production

Anti-FimH Mabs 926 and 475 were described previously [48,73]. DNA sequences encoding heavy and light chain sequences provided in the patent [73] were codon optimized by Blue Heron and cloned into a pTT5 human IgG1 vector. 50 ml Expi293 cells (ThermoFisher) were transfected according to manufacturer’s instructions with heavy and light chain encoding sequences. Culture supernatants were harvested by centrifugation and antibodies were purified using Magne Protein A beads (Promega) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Antibodies were dialyzed in cold PBS overnight in a 10,000 molecular weight cutoff cassette, with 3 buffer exchanges.

CD-1 mice immunized with purified WT FimH-DSG or FimH-DSG V27C L34C proteins in combination with QS21 adjuvant described above received a final intraperitoneal boost of 10 µg mixed with 20 µg QS21 FimH protein 4 days before fusions. Spleens cells from mice with high titers were harvested and fused with the myeloma P3X63-Ag8.653 cell line using polyethylene glycol (P7306, SIGMA HYBRI-Max). Fused cells were cultured in 96 well plates at 37 °C, 8% CO2 in DMEM containing HAT supplement (21060-017 Gibco). After 10 days in culture, hybridomas were screened by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using Maxisorp high binding 96 well plates (442404, Thermo Fisher Scientific) coated with 100 ng of FimH-DSG WT protein. Positive hybridomas secreting anti-FimH antibody were subcloned and clonality was assessed by sequencing. Over 300 parent hybridoma Mabs were screened for the ability to inhibit E. coli binding to yeast mannan using a single point titration assay. Following clonal expansion and competitive binding (binning) experiments (described in S1 Text), 5 groups of antibodies with non-overlapping binding sites were identified.

FimH-DSG TM crystallization and structure determination

Purified FimH-DSG TM, with triple stabilizing mutations (G15A, G16A, V27A), aglycosylation mutations (N7S, N70S, N228Q), a 7-residue Gly-Ser linker, FimG donor strand peptide and a C-terminal 8xHis tag, was buffer exchanged with 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5) using PD-10 column and concentrated to 10 mg/ml. Crystallization was performed at 20 °C using sitting drop vapor diffusion method by mixing equal volumes of protein and reservoir solution containing 1 M Sodium Acetate (pH 4.5) and 25% (w/v) PEG 3350. Crystals grew to their maximum size in ~7 days. Crystals were cryoprotected using the reservoir solution supplemented with 15% glycerol and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Diffraction data were collected at APS 17-ID. The data was processed using autoPROC (Global Phasing Limited) and the structure was solved using WT FimH-DSG complex (PDB code 4XOD) as a starting model. Model building and refinement were carried out using COOT [74] and BUSTER (Global Phasing Limited).

Characterization of ability of Mab to target ligand binding site

This experiment was conducted on OCTET HTX using Ni-NTA biosensors and buffer containing 1x PBS, 1% BSA and 0.0 5% Tween 20. Two-fold dilutions (from 10 µg/ml to 0.078125 µg/ml) of Octyl-mannopyranoside ligand were prebound to 5 µg/ml of His-tagged FimHLD WT for 10 min. Biosensors were allowed to capture FimHLD WT prebound to ligand for 5 min. The baseline was established before letting the biosensors loaded with FimH and different concentrations of ligand allowed to bind 5 µg/ml FimH Mab for 5 min. Nanometer response of antibody binding obtained from each dilution of the ligand was plotted against ligand concentration.

Cryo-EM sample preparation, data collection, and processing

For cryo-EM studies, Fab fragments of Mabs 299-3, 304-1, 329-2, 440-2 and 445-3 were generated using one of two methods 1) using a Mouse IgG1 Fab and F(ab´)2 Preparation Kit (Thermo Scientific Pierce) which uses immobilized Ficin for cleavage 2) production of recombinant Fab fragments with a C-terminal his tag in ExpiCHO cells, by LakePharma. Cryo-EM sample preparation, data collection and processing are described in full in the S1 Text.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance (p-value) of differences in responses between mouse groups was determined using an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction, applied to log-transformed data.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Combined file containing all supplementary figures.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012325.s001

(PDF)

S1 Data. Raw data supporting figures and tables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012325.s002

(XLSX)

S1 Text. Word document containing supplemental methodsand tables and supplementary figure legends.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012325.s003

(DOCX)

S1 File. Figure shows an alignment of full length FimH from J96 strain (set as the reference sequence) and all FimH conformation stabilized mutants and aglycosylation mutants evaluated in this study.

FimH-DSG variants wherein different lengths of Glycine-Serine linker were tested are labellede.g. FimH-DSG 7 GS (denoting FimH-DSG with a 7 amino acid Glycine-Serine linker) and so on. Residues that differ from the reference FimH sequence from J96 strain are shown in black. Image created using Geneious version 2023.0 created by Biomatters. Available from https://www.geneious.com.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012325.s004

(PDF)

S2 File. Figure shows an alignment of FimH sequences from a UTI isolate collection.

Isolates were obtained from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) database). 102 FimH sequences from UTI isolates are aligned against FimH-DSG TM and full length FimH from strain J96 (set as the reference sequence). Residues that differ from the reference FimH sequence from J96 strain are shown in black. Residues mapped to the epitopes of Mabs 329-2 (pink), 440-2 (green), 445-3 (blue) derived from cryoEM analysis are shown along with epitopes of previously identified Mabs 824 (orange), 926 (red) and 475 (turquoise). Image created using Geneious version 2023.0 created by Biomatters. Available from https://www.geneious.com.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012325.s005

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

Figs 1E, 4A and Fig DA in S1 Figs were created using Biorender.com. Thank you to Elliot Dean and Lily Liu for molecular biology and thermal shift support. Thank you to the Pfizer Pearl River Comparative Medicine group for their support for animal studies. We thank Andy Weiss for critical review of the manuscript. We thank Christina D’Arco for scientific writing support.

References

  1. 1. Foxman B. Urinary tract infection syndromes: occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014;28(1):1–13. pmid:24484571
  2. 2. Zowawi HM, Harris PNA, Roberts MJ, Tambyah PA, Schembri MA, Pezzani MD, et al. The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology. Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12(10):570–84. pmid:26334085
  3. 3. Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M, Hultgren SJ. Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(5):269–84. pmid:25853778
  4. 4. Terlizzi ME, Gribaudo G, Maffei ME. UroPathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) infections: virulence factors, bladder responses, antibiotic, and non-antibiotic antimicrobial strategies. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1566. pmid:28861072
  5. 5. Wu XR, Sun TT, Medina JJ. In vitro binding of type 1-fimbriated Escherichia coli to uroplakins Ia and Ib: relation to urinary tract infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(18):9630–5. pmid:8790381
  6. 6. Pak J, Pu Y, Zhang Z, Hasty D, Wu X. Tamm-Horsfall protein binds to type 1 fimbriated Escherichia coli and prevents E. coli from binding to uroplakin Ia and Ib receptors. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(13):9924–30.
  7. 7. Jones C, Pinkner J, Roth R, Heuser J, Nicholes A, Abraham S. FimH adhesin of type 1 pili is assembled into a fibrillar tip structure in the Enterobacteriaceae. Proce National Academy Sci United StatesAm. 1995;92(6):2081–5.
  8. 8. Hannan TJ, Mysorekar IU, Hung CS, Isaacson-Schmid ML, Hultgren SJ. Early severe inflammatory responses to uropathogenic E. coli predispose to chronic and recurrent urinary tract infection. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(8):e1001042. pmid:20811584
  9. 9. Schwartz DJ, Chen SL, Hultgren SJ, Seed PC. Population dynamics and niche distribution of uropathogenic Escherichia coli during acute and chronic urinary tract infection. Infect Immun. 2011;79(10):4250–9. pmid:21807904
  10. 10. Carey AJ, Tan CK, Ipe DS, Sullivan MJ, Cripps AW, Schembri MA, et al. Urinary tract infection of mice to model human disease: Practicalities, implications and limitations. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2016;42(5):780–99.
  11. 11. Schwartz DJ, Kalas V, Pinkner JS, Chen SL, Spaulding CN, Dodson KW, et al. Positively selected FimH residues enhance virulence during urinary tract infection by altering FimH conformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(39):15530–7. pmid:24003161
  12. 12. Martinez JJ, Mulvey MA, Schilling JD, Pinkner JS, Hultgren SJ. Type 1 pilus-mediated bacterial invasion of bladder epithelial cells. EMBO J. 2000;19(12):2803–12. pmid:10856226
  13. 13. Mulvey MA, Lopez-Boado YS, Wilson CL, Roth R, Parks WC, Heuser J, et al. Induction and evasion of host defenses by type 1-piliated uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science. 1998;282(5393):1494–7. pmid:9822381
  14. 14. Spaulding CN, Klein RD, Ruer S, Kau AL, Schreiber HL, Cusumano ZT, et al. Selective depletion of uropathogenic E. coli from the gut by a FimH antagonist. Nature. 2017;546(7659):528–32. pmid:28614296
  15. 15. Mydock-McGrane L, Cusumano Z, Han Z, Binkley J, Kostakioti M, Hannan T, et al. Antivirulence C-Mannosides as Antibiotic-sparing, oral therapeutics for urinary tract infections. J Med Chem. 2016;59(20):9390–408. pmid:27689912
  16. 16. Le Trong I, Aprikian P, Kidd BA, Thomas WE, Sokurenko EV, Stenkamp RE. Donor strand exchange and conformational changes during E. coli fimbrial formation. J Struct Biol. 2010;172(3):380–8. pmid:20570733
  17. 17. Barnhart MM, Sauer FG, Pinkner JS, Hultgren SJ. Chaperone-subunit-usher interactions required for donor strand exchange during bacterial pilus assembly. J Bacteriol. 2003;185(9):2723–30. pmid:12700251
  18. 18. Sauer M, Jakob R, Eras J, Baday S, Eris D, Navarra G, et al. Catch-bond mechanism of the bacterial adhesin FimH. Nature Communications. 2016;7:10738.
  19. 19. Rabbani S, Fiege B, Eris D, Silbermann M, Jakob RP, Navarra G, et al. Conformational switch of the bacterial adhesin FimH in the absence of the regulatory domain: Engineering a minimalistic allosteric system. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(5):1835–49. pmid:29180452
  20. 20. Le Trong I, Aprikian P, Kidd BA, Forero-Shelton M, Tchesnokova V, Rajagopal P, et al. Structural basis for mechanical force regulation of the adhesin FimH via finger trap-like beta sheet twisting. Cell. 2010;141(4):645–55. pmid:20478255
  21. 21. Aprikian P, Tchesnokova V, Kidd B, Yakovenko O, Yarov-Yarovoy V, Trinchina E. Interdomain interaction in the FimH adhesin of Escherichia coli regulates the affinity to mannose. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(32):23437–46.
  22. 22. Nilsson LM, Thomas WE, Sokurenko EV, Vogel V. Elevated shear stress protects Escherichia coli cells adhering to surfaces via catch bonds from detachment by soluble inhibitors. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(4):3005–10. pmid:16598008
  23. 23. Langermann S, Ballou W, . Vaccination utilizing the FimCH complex as a strategy to prevent Escherichia coli urinary tract infections. J Infectious Diseases. 2001;183(Suppl 1):S84–6.
  24. 24. Langermann S, Möllby R, Burlein JE, Palaszynski SR, Auguste CG, DeFusco A, et al. Vaccination with FimH adhesin protects cynomolgus monkeys from colonization and infection by uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(2):774–8. pmid:10669375
  25. 25. Langermann S, Palaszynski S, Barnhart M, Auguste G, Pinkner JS, Burlein J, et al. Prevention of mucosal Escherichia coli infection by FimH-adhesin-based systemic vaccination. Science. 1997;276(5312):607–11. pmid:9110982
  26. 26. Habibi M, Asadi Karam MR, Shokrgozar MA, Oloomi M, Jafari A, Bouzari S. Intranasal immunization with fusion protein MrpH·FimH and MPL adjuvant confers protection against urinary tract infections caused by uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis. Mol Immunol. 2015;64(2):285–94. pmid:25562574
  27. 27. Asadi Karam MR, Oloomi M, Mahdavi M, Habibi M, Bouzari S. Vaccination with recombinant FimH fused with flagellin enhances cellular and humoral immunity against urinary tract infection in mice. Vaccine. 2013;31(8):1210–6. pmid:23306365
  28. 28. Wu J, Bao C, Reinhardt RL, Abraham SN. Local induction of bladder Th1 responses to combat urinary tract infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(10).
  29. 29. Thankavel K, Madison B, Ikeda T, Malaviya R, Shah AH, Arumugam PM, et al. Localization of a domain in the FimH adhesin of Escherichia coli type 1 fimbriae capable of receptor recognition and use of a domain-specific antibody to confer protection against experimental urinary tract infection. J Clin Invest. 1997;100(5):1123–36. pmid:9276729
  30. 30. Brumbaugh AR, Mobley HLT. Preventing urinary tract infection: progress toward an effective Escherichia coli vaccine. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2012;11(6):663–76. pmid:22873125
  31. 31. Poggio TV, La Torre JL, Scodeller EA. Intranasal immunization with a recombinant truncated FimH adhesin adjuvanted with CpG oligodeoxynucleotides protects mice against uropathogenic Escherichia coli challenge. Can J Microbiol. 2006;52(11):1093–102. pmid:17215901
  32. 32. Palaszynski S, Pinkner J, Leath S, Barren P, Auguste CG, Burlein J, et al. Systemic immunization with conserved pilus-associated adhesins protects against mucosal infections. Dev Biol Stand. 1998;92:117–22. pmid:9554264
  33. 33. Eldridge GR, Hughey H, Rosenberger L, Martin SM, Shapiro AM, D’Antonio E, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an adjuvanted Escherichia coli adhesin vaccine in healthy women with and without histories of recurrent urinary tract infections: results from a first-in-human phase 1 study. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17(5):1262–70. pmid:33325785
  34. 34. Starks CM, Miller MM, Broglie PM, Cubbison J, Martin SM, Eldridge GR. Optimization and Qualification of an Assay that Demonstrates that a FimH Vaccine Induces Functional Antibody Responses in Women with Histories of Urinary Tract Infections. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics. 2020:1–10.
  35. 35. Sauer FG, Remaut H, Hultgren SJ, Waksman G. Fiber assembly by the chaperone-usher pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1694(1–3):259–67. pmid:15546670
  36. 36. Tchesnokova V, Aprikian P, Kisiela D, Gowey S, Korotkova N, Thomas W, et al. Type 1 fimbrial adhesin FimH elicits an immune response that enhances cell adhesion of Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 2011;79(10):3895–904. pmid:21768279
  37. 37. Kisiela DI, Rodriguez VB, Tchesnokova V, Avagyan H, Aprikian P, Liu Y, et al. Conformational inactivation induces immunogenicity of the receptor-binding pocket of a bacterial adhesin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(47):19089–94. pmid:24191044
  38. 38. McLellan JS, Chen M, Joyce MG, Sastry M, Stewart-Jones GBE, Yang Y, et al. Structure-based design of a fusion glycoprotein vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus. Science. 2013;342(6158):592–8. pmid:24179220
  39. 39. Riley TP, Chou H-T, Hu R, Bzymek KP, Correia AR, Partin AC, et al. Enhancing the prefusion conformational stability of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein through structure-guided design. Front Immunol. 2021;12660198. pmid:33968063
  40. 40. Nguyen HT, Qualizza A, Anang S, Zhao M, Zou S, Zhou R, et al. Functional and highly cross-linkable HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins enriched in a pretriggered conformation. J Virol. 2022;96(8):e0166821. pmid:35343783
  41. 41. Milder F, Jongeneelen M, Ritschel T, Bouchier P, Bisschop I, de Man M, et al. Universal stabilization of the influenza hemagglutinin by structure-based redesign of the pH switch regions. Proce National Academy Sci USA. 2022;119(6):e202123456.
  42. 42. Wong S, Jin J-P. Antibody epitope analysis to investigate folded structure, allosteric conformation, and evolutionary lineage of proteins. Protein Pept Lett. 2017;24(11):996–1007. pmid:28799506
  43. 43. Kleeb S, Pang L, Mayer K, Eris D, Sigl A, Preston RC, et al. FimH antagonists: bioisosteres to improve the in vitro and in vivo PK/PD profile. J Med Chem. 2015;58(5):2221–39. pmid:25666045
  44. 44. Vetsch M, Sebbel P, Glockshuber R. Chaperone-independent folding of type 1 pilus domains. J Mol Biol. 2002;322(4):827–40.
  45. 45. Tchesnokova V, Aprikian P, Yakovenko O, Larock C, Kidd B, Vogel V, et al. Integrin-like allosteric properties of the catch bond-forming FimH adhesin of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(12):7823–33. pmid:18174167
  46. 46. Sauer MM, Jakob RP, Eras J, Baday S, Eriş D, Navarra G, et al. Catch-bond mechanism of the bacterial adhesin FimH. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10738. pmid:26948702
  47. 47. Ceballos-Alcantarilla E, Merkx M. Understanding and applications of Ser/Gly linkers in protein engineering. Methods Enzymol. 2021;647:1–22. pmid:33482985
  48. 48. Kisiela DI, Avagyan H, Friend D, Jalan A, Gupta S, Interlandi G, et al. Inhibition and Reversal of Microbial Attachment by an Antibody with Parasteric Activity against the FimH Adhesin of Uropathogenic E. coli. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(5):e1004857. pmid:25974133
  49. 49. Sevier CS, Kaiser CA. Formation and transfer of disulphide bonds in living cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3(11):836–47. pmid:12415301
  50. 50. Jones CH, Pinkner JS, Nicholes AV, Slonim LN, Abraham SN, Hultgren SJ. FimC is a periplasmic PapD-like chaperone that directs assembly of type 1 pili in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(18):8397–401. pmid:8104335
  51. 51. Hull RA, Gill RE, Hsu P, Minshew BH, Falkow S. Construction and expression of recombinant plasmids encoding type 1 or D-mannose-resistant pili from a urinary tract infection Escherichia coli isolate. Infect Immun. 1981;33(3):933–8. pmid:6116675
  52. 52. Cespedes S, Saitz W, Del Canto F, De la Fuente M, Quera R, Hermoso M. Genetic diversity and virulence determinants of Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients with Crohn’s disease in Spain and Chile. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:639.
  53. 53. Bouckaert J, Berglund J, Schembri M, De Genst E, Cools L, Wuhrer M, et al. Receptor binding studies disclose a novel class of high-affinity inhibitors of the Escherichia coli FimH adhesin. Mol Microbiol. 2005;55(2):441–55. pmid:15659162
  54. 54. Kisiela DI, Rodriguez VB, Tchesnokova V, Avagyan H, Aprikian P, Liu Y, et al. Conformational inactivation induces immunogenicity of the receptor-binding pocket of a bacterial adhesin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(47):19089–94. pmid:24191044
  55. 55. Sauer M, Jakob R, Luber T, Canonica F, Navarra G, Ernst B, et al. Binding of the bacterial adhesin FimH to its natural, multivalent high-mannose type glycan targets. J American Chemical Society. 2019;141(2):936–44.
  56. 56. Touaibia M, Krammer E, Shiao T, Yamakawa N, Wang Q, Glinschert A, et al. Sites for dynamic protein-carbohydrate interactions of O- and C-linked mannosides on the E. coli FimH adhesin. Molecules. 2017;22(7).
  57. 57. Wellens A, Lahmann M, Touaibia M, Vaucher J, Oscarson S, Roy R, et al. The tyrosine gate as a potential entropic lever in the receptor-binding site of the bacterial adhesin FimH. Biochemistry. 2012;51(24):4790–9. pmid:22657089
  58. 58. Kisiela DI, Magala P, Interlandi G, Carlucci LA, Ramos A, Tchesnokova V, et al. Toggle switch residues control allosteric transitions in bacterial adhesins by participating in a concerted repacking of the protein core. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(4):e1009440. pmid:33826682
  59. 59. Perer E, Stacey H, Eichorn T, Hughey H, Lawrence J, Cunningham E, et al. Case report: Long-term follow-up of patients who received a FimCH vaccine for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections caused by antibiotic resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a case report series. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1359738. pmid:38545110
  60. 60. Graham BS, Gilman MSA, McLellan JS. Structure-Based Vaccine Antigen Design. Annu Rev Med. 2019;70:91–104. pmid:30691364
  61. 61. Musunuri S, Weidenbacher PAB, Kim PS. Bringing immunofocusing into focus. NPJ Vaccines. 2024;9(1):11. pmid:38195562
  62. 62. McCormick JK, Tripp TJ, Olmsted SB, Matsuka YV, Gahr PJ, Ohlendorf DH, et al. Development of streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin C vaccine toxoids that are protective in the rabbit model of toxic shock syndrome. J Immunol. 2000;165(4):2306–12. pmid:10925320
  63. 63. Donald RGK, Flint M, Kalyan N, Johnson E, Witko SE, Kotash C, et al. A novel approach to generate a recombinant toxoid vaccine against Clostridium difficile. Microbiology (Reading). 2013;159(Pt 7):1254–66. pmid:23629868
  64. 64. McLeod B, Mabrouk MT, Miura K, Ravichandran R, Kephart S, Hailemariam S, et al. Vaccination with a structure-based stabilized version of malarial antigen Pfs48/45 elicits ultra-potent transmission-blocking antibody responses. Immunity. 2022;55(9):1680–1692.e8. pmid:35977542
  65. 65. Sokurenko EV, Tchesnokova V, Interlandi G, Klevit R, Thomas WE. Neutralizing antibodies against allosteric proteins: insights from a bacterial adhesin. J Mol Biol. 2022;434(17):167717. pmid:35798162
  66. 66. Abernathy ME, Dam K-MA, Esswein SR, Jette CA, Bjorkman PJ. How Antibodies recognize pathogenic viruses: structural correlates of antibody neutralization of HIV-1, SARS-CoV-2, and Zika. Viruses. 2021;13(10):2106. pmid:34696536
  67. 67. Friedrich N, Stiegeler E, Glögl M, Lemmin T, Hansen S, Kadelka C, et al. Distinct conformations of the HIV-1 V3 loop crown are targetable for broad neutralization. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):6705. pmid:34795280
  68. 68. Chorro L, Ciolino T, Torres CL, Illenberger A, Aglione J, Corts P, et al. A cynomolgus monkey E. coli urinary tract infection model confirms efficacy of new FimH vaccine candidates. Infect Immun. 2024;92(10):e0016924. pmid:39297649
  69. 69. Begier E, Rosenthal NA, Gurtman A, Kartashov A, Donald RGK, Lockhart SP. Epidemiology of Invasive Escherichia coli Infection and Antibiotic Resistance Status Among Patients Treated in US Hospitals: 2009–2016. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2021;73(4):565–74.
  70. 70. Nickel JC, Doiron RC. An effective sublingual vaccine, MV140, safely reduces risk of recurrent urinary tract infection in women. Pathogens. 2023;12(3):359. pmid:36986281
  71. 71. Lopes FA, Miranda M, Ye A, Rodrigues J, Pé-Leve P, Palma Reis J, et al. Immunoprophylaxis with MV140 Is Effective in the reduction of urinary tract infections-A prospective real-life study. Vaccines (Basel). 2024;12(12):1426. pmid:39772086
  72. 72. Schembri MA, Hasman H, Klemm P. Expression and purification of the mannose recognition domain of the FimH adhesin. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;188(2):147–51. pmid:10913698
  73. 73. Kisiela D, Thomas WE, Tchesnokova V, Sokurenko EV. Inventors; University of Washington, assignee. Compositions and Methods for Treatment and Prevention of Uropathogenic E. coli Infection. USA; 2018.
  74. 74. Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004;60(Pt 12 Pt 1):2126–32. pmid:15572765