Advertisement

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Review

Review articles synthesize the best available evidence on a topic relevant to the pathogens community.

See all article types »

The cell envelope of Mycobacterium abscessus and its role in pathogenesis

Abstract

Mycobacterium abscessus is a nontuberculosis mycobacterium (NTM) that has shown an exponential rise in its ability to cause disease. Due to its ubiquitous presence in the environment, M. abscessus is widely implicated in secondary exacerbations of many nosocomial infections and genetic respiratory disorders, such as cystic fibrosis (CF). Contrary to other rapidly growing NTMs, the cell envelope of M. abscessus harbors several prominent features and undergoes modifications that are responsible for its pathogenesis. Compositional changes of the mycobacterial outer membrane (MOM) significantly decrease the presence of glycopeptidolipids (GPLs) and enable the transition from a colonizing, smooth morphotype into a virulent, rough morphotype. The GPLs are transported to the MOM by the Mycobacterial membrane proteins Large (MmpL), which further act as drug efflux pumps and confer antibiotic resistance. Lastly, M. abscessus possesses 2 type VII secretion systems (T7SS): ESX-3 and ESX-4, both of which have recently been implicated in host–pathogen interactions and virulence. This review summarizes the current knowledge of M. abscessus pathogenesis and highlights the clinically relevant association between the structure and functions of its cell envelope.

Citation: Parmar S, Tocheva EI (2023) The cell envelope of Mycobacterium abscessus and its role in pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog 19(5): e1011318. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011318

Editor: Christoph Dehio, University of Basel, SWITZERLAND

Published: May 18, 2023

Copyright: © 2023 Parmar, Tocheva. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This work was supported by a Canadian Institute for Health Research Project Grant number 148598 to EIT. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Introduction

Mycobacterium abscessus is an emerging pathogen that has changed the narrative for rapidly growing nontuberculosis mycobacteria (NTMs) [1–3]. Rapidly growing NTMs do not typically have pathogenic features (i.e., the ability to cause disease); however, M. abscessus can cause diseased states that, in many ways, resemble those of M. tuberculosis [4–6]. Classified as a Biosafety Level 2 pathogen, it is the causative agent of various nosocomial and mucocutaneous infections. In humans, M. abscessus mainly colonizes epithelial cells but can also infect macrophages and neutrophils. Though no specific environmental reservoir has been identified, M. abscessus can survive and proliferate successfully in amoeba [5,7]. Its exceptional multidrug resistance and ubiquitous environmental presence make it a persistent pathogen that is difficult to treat with standard antibiotics, especially in patients with respiratory disorders and compromised immune systems [8]. Due to increased infectivity of people with underlying pulmonary disorders, M. abscessus plays a significant role in exacerbating life-threatening genetic disorders including bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cystic fibrosis (CF) [8]. Over the years, secondary infections caused by M. abscessus have surpassed those of common CF-associated pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia [2,9], making it an important pathogen to consider during disease progression and treatment. In addition to the lungs, M. abscessus can infect other major organs, including eyes, brain, and skin [1]. Its pervasive nature makes it a fairly common NTM among various skin and soft tissue infections. These infections can spread directly through contaminated water, surgical tools, and other shared materials. Surgical wounds, communal spas and hot tubs, and cosmetic procedures are also common routes for the spread of M. abscessus skin infections, which include various skin lesions, erythematous nodules, abscesses and sinuses, erythematous papules, and others [1,10]. Ocular M. abscessus infections mainly cause scleritis, keratitis, and endophthalmitis [11]. A relatively uncommon occurrence of M. abscessus infection is in the central nervous system (CNS) wherein studies in zebrafish embryo have shown specific neurotropism of M. abscessus [12]. In humans, once acquired, it can lead to cerebral abscesses and meningitis; these effects are more prevalent in immunocompromised patients like those with HIV or undergoing chemotherapy [13].

The cell envelope of mycobacteria is their main distinguishing feature that plays an essential role during pathogenesis. Surface components in M. abscessus that have not been collectively observed in any other rapid- or slow-growing mycobacterium include distinct surface lipids, drug efflux pumps, and secretion systems. The interplay among all of these components determines cell envelope integrity and function. This review highlights important surface components of M. abscessus and summarizes their clinical role in the context of CF.

I. Cell envelope modifications

Unlike typical cell envelope architectures of gram-positive (monoderm) and gram-negative (diderm) bacteria, the mycobacterial cell envelope has distinct features and composition [14,15]. Mycobacteria belong to the phylum Actinobacteria, typically characterized as monoderm with high guanine and cytosine content in their DNA [16]. Conversely, in addition to their inner/cytoplasmic membrane (CM) and peptidoglycan (PG), Mycobacteria have a unique mycolic acid outer membrane (MOM) and an arabinogalactan layer (Fig 1) [15]. Modifications and up-regulation of clinically important lipid components of the MOM such as glycopeptidolipids (GPLs), trehalose-6,6-dimycolate (TDM), trehalose monomycolate (TMM), trehalose polyphleates (TPPs), and phosphatidyl-myo-inositol dimannoside (PIM) have been documented during pathogenesis [14,17].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. The major components of the M. abscessus cell envelope.

The MOM displays morphologically and immunologically important lipid moieties such as GPLs, TDMs, TMMs, PIMs and TPPs. The CM displays membrane embedded protein assemblies that are essential for the transport of these lipids as well as for the release of virulence factors. These include 3 major complexes: (1) MmpL4-MmpS-GAP, which aid in the transport of GPLs to the outer surface of M. abscessus and regulate the smooth to rough morphotype transition; (2) MmpLs, implicated in drug efflux mechanisms; and (3) ESX-3 and ESX-4, implicated in infecting host cells through the release of the effector molecules EsxG/H and EsxT/U, respectively. CM, cytoplasmic membrane; GPL, glycopeptidolipid; MmpL, Mycobacterial membrane proteins Large; MOM, mycolic acid outer membrane; PIM, phosphatidyl-myo-inositol dimannoside; TDM, trehalose-6,6-dimycolate; TMM, trehalose monomycolate; TPP, trehalose polyphleate.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011318.g001

Modifications in the cell envelope of M. abscessus results in the formation of 2 distinct colony morphotypes: rough and smooth (Fig 2) [18–20]. These morphotypes have unique properties affecting bacterial adhesion and host interactions in vivo and in vitro: The smooth morphotype is considered noninvasive, whereas the rough morphotype is virulent and associated with disease progression [19,21]. During infection of host cells, M. abscessus can transition from smooth into a rough morphotype by modulating GPL levels on its MOM [5,18,19]. The presence of GPLs on the surface of smooth variants makes them less hydrophobic, which is thought to promote sliding motility on agar, as well as induce host colonization upon infection [5,19,22]. The smooth variants also form smaller clumps, which are readily engulfed and lead to faster fusion with lysosomes [5]. The lack of GPLs in rough variants, on the other hand, induces aggregation and cording [12], making it difficult for immune cells to engulf the bacteria and contain the infection [5,6].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Colony morphotypes in M. abscessus.

(A) Smooth colony morphotype, exemplified by the round colony edges, and (B) rough colony morphotype, characterized by the irregular edges and flat surface. Freezer stocks of M. abscessus ATCC 19977 were first used to inoculate liquid Middlebrook 7H9 media supplemented with 0.05% Tween-80, 0.2% glycerol, and OADC and grown at 37°C until mid-log phase (OD600 of 0.6–0.7). Cultures were then plated on Middlebrook 7H10 solid media supplemented with 0.2% glycerol and OADC for 5–7 days at 37°C. Scale bar, 3 mm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011318.g002

Mycobacterial membrane proteins large/small (MmpL/MmpS) and other accessory proteins, such as GPL-addressing proteins (GAPs), form transport assemblies across the CM. Dysfunction in any of these membrane proteins results in defective lipid transport to the cell surface and altered cell morphotype. For example, M. abscessus strains with irreversible mutations in the genes of mycobacterial nonribosomal peptide synthetases (responsible for GPL synthesis) and deletion of the MmpL4 genes mmpl4a or mmpl4b (responsible for GPL transport) have led to lack of GPLs and resulted in transition into rough morphotypes [23–25]. This is also accompanied by decreased surface colonization of host epithelial cells, increased proliferation in macrophages, and enhanced innate immune responses, all properties associated with the rough morphotype [23,25,26]. MmpL8 is another important protein in this group that is involved in the synthesis of a previously undefined glycolipid glycosyl diacylated nonadecyl diol (GDND), as well as in the interaction with phagocytic host cells [27]. This glycolipid is unique to M. abscessus and may have a specific role in infection, especially under the regulation of MmpL8 [27]. Thus, the cell envelope composition drives the initial stages of infection such as surface attachment (by the smooth variant) and intracellular survival and proliferation (by the rough variant).

Imaging studies of bone marrow–derived murine macrophages infected with the smooth variant of M. abscessus revealed a clear zone between the bacterial surface and the phagosome membrane and prevented phagosome maturation and acidification [5]. The rough variants, on the other hand, formed distinct contacts with the phagosome membrane and, in addition, were able to actively replicate inside the phagosomes, eventually causing rupture and cell-to-cell spread of the bacteria [5,28]. Though it remains unclear when the transition from smooth to rough occurs during infection, the loss of GPLs reveals underlying immune-stimulatory molecules that trigger an immune response by the host. For example, PIM2 and lipoproteins exposed on the surface of M. abscessus were shown to activate the Toll-like receptor-2 (TLR-2), leading to an increase in tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)-mediated inflammation [29,30]. Similar to M. tuberculosis, other virulence-associated glycolipids such as TDMs are also expressed on the surface of M. abscessus and, together with TPPs, are responsible for cording of the rough variant during granuloma formation [31–33]. Recently, in a zebrafish infection model, the rough morphotype caused inflammation by modulating host TNF-α signaling, leading to necrotic granuloma formation that was comparatively less accelerated in smooth morphotypes [34]. Knock-out mutants of TNF signaling genes (tnfa, tnfr1, and tnfr2) reduced the burden of the rough morphotype but increased the proliferation of the smooth morphotype during infection [34]. Overall, the smooth and rough variants show different intra- and extracellular lifestyles, both of which are needed for bacterial survival and invasion of host cells.

II. Cell envelope–mediated antibiotic resistance

Several features of the mycobacterial cell envelope confer intrinsic resistance to most antibiotics: GPLs in the MOM, biofilm formation, and drug efflux pumps. As discussed above, the lack of GPLs results in enhanced hydrophobicity of the MOM in rough variants. Since β-lactams, as well as the anti-TB drugs INH, EMB, and streptomycin, are hydrophilic, the susceptibility to these therapeutic agents is extremely low. Furthermore, GPLs are associated with inducing biofilm formation, where the extracellular matrix acts as a physical barrier and protects bacteria from antibiotics such as clarithromycin and amikacin [35,36]. A study of patients with COPD identified the presence of smooth and rough variants in biofilms [37,38]. Since the smooth morphotype is rich in GPLs, the presence of the rough morphotype in the biofilm could act as a virulence factor that promotes invasive growth.

Along with cell wall impermeability, active efflux pumps provide resistance by expelling drug molecules that enter the cell [39,40]. Several mycobacterial drug efflux pumps have been identified, including the MmpLs [41]. As such, these proteins belong to a subclass of the Resistance-Nodulation-Cell Division (RND) permeases, and mmpL gene orthologs have been characterized for their role in drug efflux and antibiotic resistance in M. tuberculosis [42,43]. Moreover, M. abscessus expresses a greater abundance of MmpL proteins compared to most known rapidly growing NTMs, which may explain their higher antibiotic resistance [44]. For example, the TetR transcriptional regulator MAB_2299c controls genes encoding for the MmpS-MmpL efflux pump and mutations in these genes decrease the resistance of M. abscessus to clofazimine and bedaquiline [40,45,46]. Lastly, a recent study showed that the GPL-defective mutants of rough morphotype had similar antibiotic susceptibility as the smooth wild-type M. abscessus, suggesting the involvement of additional factors contributing to resistance during chronic infections [47].

III. Secretion systems in M. abscessus

Specialized bacterial secretion systems (type I to type IX) have been recognized as membrane-associated nanomachines that aid in transporting molecules in and out of cells. They promote pathogenesis by secreting virulence factors (substrates) that are required for intracellular survival and for evading the bactericidal mechanisms of the host cell [48]. The type VII secretion system (T7SS) was discovered in M. tuberculosis and is the major secretion system in mycobacteria [49–51]. There are 5 subtypes of the T7SS known as ESX-1 to ESX-5 [50,51]. Among these, ESX-1, 3, and 5 have been widely studied for their role in mycobacterial survival and pathogenesis [50,52], while limited data are available on the structure and function of ESX-2 and ESX-4. More specifically, ESX-1, with the largest gene locus, supports bacterial survival inside the host, promotes phagosome rupture, and triggers dissemination of mycobacteria through host cell lysis [53,54]. ESX-3 is mainly involved in iron and zinc acquisition and modulation of host cell immunity [55,56]. The ESX-5 secretion system is specific to slow-growing mycobacteria, and, similar to ESX-3, it plays a part in nutrient uptake and immunomodulation [57,58].

Some pathogenic strains of mycobacteria such as M. tuberculosis have all 5 ESX secretion systems, whereas M. abscessus possesses only ESX-3 and ESX-4 (Fig 3) [59]. The core complex of all subtypes is thought to be conserved and structural studies of ESX-5 from M. tuberculosis revealed that it spans the CM and is formed by EccB, EccC, EccD, EccE, and MycP (Fig 4) [60,61]. Briefly, EccB anchors the system within the periplasmic space, EccC encodes for membrane-anchored FtsK–SpoIIIE family ATPase, EccD likely forms a membrane channel, EccE is a membrane and cell wall associated protein, and MycP is a membrane-anchored serine protease. In addition, a cytosolic ATPase, EccA, is required for specific substrate secretion and is recruited to the ESX secretion machinery upon substrate binding [50,62,63]. The known substrates of these ESX systems are broadly divided into 3 types: Esx group that belong to the WXG-100 protein family (e.g., EsxA, EsxB, EsxT, and EsxU); Esp or the ESX-1 secretion-associated proteins (e.g., EspA, B, and C); and the PE-PPE group, which are proteins that have characteristic N-terminal motifs of Pro-Glu and Pro-Pro-Glu (e.g., PE4–PPE5) [50,51]. Upon secretion, these substrates carry out specific functions that aid in bacterial survival and mediate virulence in host cells.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Gene clusters for ESX-3 and ESX-4 in M. abscessus compared to M. tuberculosis.

Both ESX-3 and ESX-4 encode for major structural components as well as secreted substrates. The genes eccB, eccC, eccD, eccE, and mycP encode for proteins that make up the intact machinery of the ESX systems. ESX substrate molecules include PE5-PPE4, EsxG, and EsxH for ESX-3, and EsxT and EsxU for ESX-4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011318.g003

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Single-particle cryo-EM structure of the core complex of ESX-5 from M. tuberculosis.

The core complex is composed of EccB, EccC, EccD, EccE, and MycP and spans the CM. Top and bottom views of the complex reveal the multimeric nature of the complex with its dimensions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011318.g004

ESX-4 and its substrates in M. abscessus.

In most mycobacteria, the esx-4 cluster lacks the gene for EccE resulting in architectural instability and functionally incapacitated ESX-4 [64]. However, the esx-4 gene cluster in M. abscessus encodes for the missing EccE4 core complex protein and is essential for survival inside macrophages and amoebae (Fig 3) [4]. Another crucial core component gene is the eccB4 that affects intracellular survival and modifies the phagosome environment, causing phagosome rupture inside host cells [4]. The effects of ESX-4 are known to be substrate dependent since deletion of ESX-4 core complex genes results in lower expression of EsxU and EsxT (ESX-4 substrates) as well as PE-PPE proteins (ESX-3 substrates) [4]. In line with these findings, a recent study shows that EsxU and EsxT from M. abscessus form a heterodimer involved in phagosome membrane damage of macrophages [65]. Therefore, the EsxU/EsxT pair is crucial for inducing membrane permeability, which is advantageous during early stages of bacterial infection. However, when tested in vivo in zebrafish and mice, knockout mutants of EsxU/EsxT induced hypervirulence via increased bacterial growth and granuloma/abscess formation [65]. These findings from 2 different experimental settings imply that the ESX-4 substrates may be essential during the initial stages of infection and down-regulated subsequently to induce hypervirulence and spread of the infection. Since ESX-4 induces pathogenicity in M. abscessus in a manner similar to ESX-1 in M. tuberculosis, it may act analogously to the ESX-1.

ESX-3 and its substrates in M. abscessus.

The ESX-3 secretion system is the most conserved among all T7SSs. The functional and structural characteristics of ESX-3 have been widely studied in M. tuberculosis, revealing a role in maintaining intracellular survival in macrophages, delaying phagolysosome fusion, and acquiring bacterial nutrients during macrophage infection [50]. The genes for ESX-3 are expressed in response to iron limitation and maintain metal homeostasis in mycobacteria [66–68]. Along with the main core components of ESX-3, the operon encodes for various ESX-3 substrates including the EsxG, EsxH along with PE5-PPE4 proteins (Fig 3). EsxH, in particular, plays a key role in M. tuberculosis pathogenicity by impeding the hepatocyte growth factor receptor substrate (HRS) component of the human endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) pathway, which is essential for endomembrane repair [55,56,69]. In M. tuberculosis, the presence of both iron and zinc strongly represses esx-3 expression, leading to lower secretion of EsxG and EsxH, and ultimately diminishing intracellular survival in macrophages [68]. EsxG and EsxH also interfere with lysosomal trafficking and phagosome maturation [55,56,69]. The secretion of these 2 proteins directly correlates with intracellular growth and bacterial virulence, and mutants lacking these substrates are highly attenuated for growth in human macrophages [70]. Furthermore, expression of recombinant ESX-3 substrates PE5 and PE15 in M. tuberculosis and M. smegmatis has been shown to improved intracellular survival and alter the innate immune responses by reducing transcription levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-12 and up-regulating the levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10, IL-4, IL-5, and TGF-β [70].

Similar to M. tuberculosis, the ESX-3 of M. abscessus has been shown experimentally to play a role in pathogenesis of mice [71]. Mutations in the genes for EsxG and EsxH induce less systemic and local inflammatory responses compared to wild-type bacteria during infection [71]. In M. abscessus, ESX-3 induces pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-12p40 in murine and human macrophages and is associated with activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) as well as NF-κB signaling after infection [71]. Deletion mutants of the ESX-3 result in decreased production of inflammatory cytokines, lowered levels of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) and nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and reduced neutrophil recruitment to lung tissues [71]. Although the prospects of ESX-3–mediated pathogenic functions in M. abscessus are intriguing, more studies are required.

IV. Interplay between major cell envelope components in M. abscessus

Cell envelope dynamics affect membrane morphology and have functional implications for M. abscessus pathophysiology. It is therefore important to consider interactions between various cell envelope components. For example, the transition from smooth to rough morphotype allows M. abscessus to evade the host’s immune system. On the other hand, the ESX systems induce pathogenicity by secreting effector molecules. In order to cross the thick cell envelope, changes in the lipid and protein composition of the CM and MOM are required. This raises the question of whether the change from the smooth to rough morphotype affects the expression and function of the ESX secretion systems. Since the transport of membrane lipids is dependent on CM proteins such as MmpLs, their expression may also affect the synthesis of ESX-3 and ESX-4. Since the function of ESX-3 and ESX-4 is not well characterized, it is also possible that effector substrates alter the expression and/or transport of MOM lipids through the MmpL protein complexes in order to promote their own secretion. Association between different cell envelope components was presented in M. marinum and M. tuberculosis wherein ESX-1 acts in concert with the membrane lipid PDIM during phagosomal damage [54,72]. In context to the similarity between ESX-1 and ESX-4, it was also suggested that ESX-4 may have a similar combined effect with other membrane assemblies like the MmpL8 that transports GDND in order to mediate its effects inside the host cell [51].

In addition to their role during pathogenesis, secretion systems have been shown to affect membrane properties such as capsule integrity, hydrophobicity, and biofilm formation. In slow-growing mycobacteria, the ESX-5 system is involved in maintaining capsule integrity and surface hydrophobicity through the secretion of PPE-10 substrate [73]. Studies on the ESX-5 system in M. marinum lacking the MOM porin MspA have demonstrated impaired bacterial growth, suggesting a link between ESX-5 and membrane permeability [57]. Deletion of the ESX-1 substrates in M. marinum causes attenuation of biofilm formation and sliding motility [74], and impaired ESX-3 in M. marinum results in decreased permeability, abnormal colony morphology, and reduced biofilm formation [75]. Since M. abscessus encodes for ESX-3 and ESX-4 only, understanding how these 2 secretion systems coordinate their activity to compensate for the lack of ESX-1 and ESX-5 is of major significance.

V. Clinical implications of M. abscessus in CF

The distinct cell envelope profile of M. abscessus makes it a highly potent infectious agent in many mucocutaneous disorders. Along with a high level of resistance to multiple antibiotics, M. abscessus is also resistant to most disinfectants and, hence, responsible for various postsurgical infections [1,76]. The nature of infection is generally progressive, but a fulminant course has also been observed, especially in acute respiratory disorders [76,77]. Overall, M. abscessus is proving to be one of the most worrisome NTMs prevalent in present times [2,78,79].

CF is an autosomal recessive disorder with a dysfunctional CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, mainly affecting the respiratory tract. This life-threatening disorder is globally prevalent with a high incidence rate among white populations, especially in children [80]. M. abscessus has emerged as a major pathogen in CF patients, leading to further deterioration of lung function [2]. A defective CFTR protein affects chloride and sodium ion levels inside airway epithelial cells, lowering the water content in the mucus and impairing proper airway secretion. The thicker mucus leads to inefficient mucociliary clearance and renders the airway epithelium a favorable environment for bacterial colonization [79].

Membrane dynamics between smooth and rough morphotypes has been proposed as the link between CFTR dysfunction and increased susceptibility to M. abscessus [81,82]. The smooth morphotype colonizes the airway epithelium and the transition into the rough morphotype induces virulence in CF patients [83,84]. The smooth variant is predominant during the initial phases of infection when its GPL-abundant MOM permits evasion of the host’s immune system by masking the bacterial cell surface from immune instigative molecules such as TLR-2 [85]. This masking prevents downstream signaling via IL-8 and the recruitment of neutrophils [85]. Once inside the host, the invasive role of the rough variants is dominated by their cord-forming ability as shown in the CF model organism zebrafish [86]. In support of this model, rough variants are routinely isolated from samples of chronically ill patients [19,87,88]. Even though CF is a genetic disorder, it does provide a conducive environment for pathogens, which need to be treated with antibiotics. In addition to the hydrophobic MOM and MmpLs efflux pumps discussed here, M. abscessus has an unusually high resistance to most antibiotics due to various antibiotic-modifying enzymes [89]. As a result, the inability to treat this infection promotes chronic disease [40,90]. Furthermore, the properties of M. abscessus biofilms (such as viscoelasticity and stiffness) are comparatively higher than most other pathogenic bacteria and are suggested to hinder airway clearance [91].

Even though defective CFTR mainly affects alveolar epithelial cells, some ESX-3– and ESX-4–associated cellular changes have also been identified in macrophages [92] (Fig 5). For example, ESX-4 was shown to cause phagosome damage and promote intracellular survival by reducing phagosome acidification [4]. Similarly, one of the effects of a dysfunctional CFTR protein is also the impairment of phagosome acidification [81,82], a process that may be further amplified by the ESX-4. Generally, a defective CFTR leads to high inflammatory responses that progressively deteriorate lung function. This pathophysiology of increased oxidative stress and neutrophil response is also observed in zebrafish with a dysfunctional CFTR protein [93]. When zebrafish with a dysfunctional CFTR were infected with M. abscessus, lower ROS production was observed, which led to impaired neutrophil chemotaxis, ultimately protecting the bacteria [81,82,94]. The role of ESX-3 during CF is still under investigation.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5. Proposed effects of ESX-3 and ESX-4 in M. abscessus on CFTR-defective phagocytes.

M. abscessus as an NTM known to exacerbate prerespiratory conditions such as CF through mechanism that are not yet well characterized. The effects of ESX-3 and ESX-4 may overlap with the pathophysiology of a dysfunctional CFTR protein and worsen disease states.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011318.g005

Concluding remarks

The wide range of pathogenic factors in M. abscessus gives this organism an unprecedented capacity to elicit a range of infection patterns. More importantly, most of these pathogenic factors revolve around the cell envelope structure and composition of the bacterium. The flexibility to transform into a more virulent morphotype aids in deceiving the host’s immune system and enables systemic spread. A unique MOM and numerous efflux pumps form a strong barrier against the host’s immune system as well as a wide range of antibiotics. Furthermore, the presence of a distinct ESX-4 provides M. abscessus with armaments to modulate the host immune system, allowing for a more aggressive progression of the infection. Many of these features remain obscured and require further studies to develop a better understanding of the infection mechanisms employed by this organism.

References

  1. 1. Lee M-R, Sheng W-H, Hung C-C, Yu C-J, Lee L-N, Hsueh P-R. Mycobacterium abscessus: Complex Infections in Humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(9). pmid:26295364
  2. 2. Degiacomi G, Sammartino JC, Chiarelli LR, Riabova O, Makarov V, Pasca MR. Mycobacterium abscessus, an Emerging and Worrisome Pathogen among Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(23):5868. pmid:31766758
  3. 3. Johansen MD, Herrmann JL, Kremer L. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria and the rise of Mycobacterium abscessus. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(7):392–407. Epub 2020/02/23. pmid:32086501.
  4. 4. Laencina L, Dubois V, Moigne VL, Viljoen A, Majlessi L, Pritchard J, et al. Identification of genes required for Mycobacterium abscessus growth in vivo with a prominent role of the ESX-4 locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(5):E1002–E1011. pmid:29343644
  5. 5. Roux A-L, Viljoen A, Bah A, Simeone R, Bernut A, Laencina L, et al. The distinct fate of smooth and rough Mycobacterium abscessus variants inside macrophages. Open Biol. 2016;6(11):160185. pmid:27906132
  6. 6. Brambilla C, Llorens-Fons M, Julián E, Noguera-Ortega E, Tomàs-Martínez C, Pérez-Trujillo M, et al. Mycobacteria Clumping Increase Their Capacity to Damage Macrophages. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1562. pmid:27757105
  7. 7. Bakala N’Goma JC, Le Moigne V, Soismier N, Laencina L, Le Chevalier F, Roux A-L, et al. Mycobacterium abscessus Phospholipase C Expression Is Induced during Coculture within Amoebae and Enhances M. abscessus Virulence in Mice. Infect Immun. 2015;83(2):780–791. pmid:25486995
  8. 8. Nessar R, Cambau E, Reyrat JM, Murray A, Gicquel B. Mycobacterium abscessus: a new antibiotic nightmare. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(4):810–818. pmid:22290346
  9. 9. Mougari F, Guglielmetti L, Raskine L, Sermet-Gaudelus I, Veziris N, Cambau E. Infections caused by Mycobacterium abscessus: epidemiology, diagnostic tools and treatment. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2016;14(12):1139–1154. pmid:27690688
  10. 10. Kothavade RJ, Dhurat RS, Mishra SN, Kothavade UR. Clinical and laboratory aspects of the diagnosis and management of cutaneous and subcutaneous infections caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32(2):161–188. pmid:23139042
  11. 11. Girgis DO, Karp CL, Miller D. Ocular infections caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria: update on epidemiology and management. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;40(5):467–475. pmid:21902780
  12. 12. Bernut A, Herrmann J-L, Kissa K, Dubremetz J-F, Gaillard J-L, Lutfalla G, et al. Mycobacterium abscessus cording prevents phagocytosis and promotes abscess formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(10):E943–E952. pmid:24567393
  13. 13. Lee M-R, Cheng A, Lee Y-C, Yang C-Y, Lai C-C, Huang Y-T, et al. CNS infections caused by Mycobacterium abscessus complex: clinical features and antimicrobial susceptibilities of isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(1):222–225. pmid:21980068
  14. 14. Rens C, Chao JD, Sexton DL, Tocheva EI, Av-Gay Y. Roles for phthiocerol dimycocerosate lipids in Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis. Microbiology (Reading). 2021;167(3). Epub 2021/02/26. pmid:33629944.
  15. 15. Vincent AT, Nyongesa S, Morneau I, Reed MB, Tocheva EI, Veyrier FJ. The Mycobacterial Cell Envelope: A Relict From the Past or the Result of Recent Evolution? Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2341. Epub 2018/10/30. pmid:30369911.
  16. 16. Beskrovnaya P, Sexton DL, Golmohammadzadeh M, Hashimi A, Tocheva EI. Structural, Metabolic and Evolutionary Comparison of Bacterial Endospore and Exospore Formation. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:630573. Epub 2021/03/27. pmid:33767680.
  17. 17. Burbaud S, Laval F, Lemassu A, Daffe M, Guilhot C, Chalut C. Trehalose Polyphleates Are Produced by a Glycolipid Biosynthetic Pathway Conserved across Phylogenetically Distant Mycobacteria. Cell Chem Biol. 2016;23(2):278–289. Epub 2016/03/31. pmid:27028886.
  18. 18. Byrd TF, Lyons CR. Preliminary Characterization of a Mycobacterium abscessus Mutant in Human and Murine Models of Infection. Infect Immun. 1999;67(9):4700–4707.
  19. 19. Howard ST, Rhoades E, Recht J, Pang X, Alsup A, Kolter R, et al. Spontaneous reversion of Mycobacterium abscessus from a smooth to a rough morphotype is associated with reduced expression of glycopeptidolipid and reacquisition of an invasive phenotype. Microbiology (Reading). 2006;152(Pt 6):1581–1590.
  20. 20. Krasowska A, Sigler K. How microorganisms use hydrophobicity and what does this mean for human needs? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:112. pmid:25191645
  21. 21. Gutiérrez AV, Viljoen A, Ghigo E, Herrmann J-L, Kremer L. Glycopeptidolipids, a Double-Edged Sword of the Mycobacterium abscessus Complex. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1145. pmid:29922253
  22. 22. Viljoen A, Viela F, Kremer L, Dufrêne YF. Fast chemical force microscopy demonstrates that glycopeptidolipids define nanodomains of varying hydrophobicity on mycobacteria. Nanoscale Horizons. 2020;5(6):944–953. pmid:32314749
  23. 23. Pawlik A, Garnier G, Orgeur M, Tong P, Lohan A, Le Chevalier F, et al. Identification and characterization of the genetic changes responsible for the characteristic smooth-to-rough morphotype alterations of clinically persistent Mycobacterium abscessus. Mol Microbiol. 2013;90(3):612–629. pmid:23998761
  24. 24. Bernut A, Viljoen A, Dupont C, Sapriel G, Blaise M, Bouchier C, et al. Insights into the smooth-to-rough transitioning in Mycobacterium bolletii unravels a functional Tyr residue conserved in all mycobacterial MmpL family members. Mol Microbiol. 2016;99(5):866–883. pmid:26585558
  25. 25. Nessar R, Reyrat J-M, Davidson LB, Byrd TF. Deletion of the mmpL4b gene in the Mycobacterium abscessus glycopeptidolipid biosynthetic pathway results in loss of surface colonization capability, but enhanced ability to replicate in human macrophages and stimulate their innate immune response. Microbiology. 2011;157(4):1187–1195.
  26. 26. Park IK, Hsu AP, Tettelin H, Shallom SJ, Drake SK, Ding L, et al. Clonal Diversification and Changes in Lipid Traits and Colony Morphology in Mycobacterium abscessus Clinical Isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(11):3438–3447. pmid:26292297
  27. 27. Dubois V, Viljoen A, Laencina L, Moigne VL, Bernut A, Dubar F, et al. MmpL8MAB controls Mycobacterium abscessus virulence and production of a previously unknown glycolipid family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(43):E10147–E10156. pmid:30301802
  28. 28. Kim B-R, Kim B-J, Kook Y-H, Kim B-J. Phagosome Escape of Rough Mycobacterium abscessus Strains in Murine Macrophage via Phagosomal Rupture Can Lead to Type I Interferon Production and Their Cell-To-Cell Spread. Front Immunol. 2019;10.
  29. 29. Roux A-L, Ray A, Pawlik A, Medjahed H, Etienne G, Rottman M, et al. Overexpression of proinflammatory TLR-2-signalling lipoproteins in hypervirulent mycobacterial variants. Cell Microbiol. 2011;13(5):692–704. pmid:21143571
  30. 30. Rhoades ER, Archambault AS, Greendyke R, Hsu F-F, Streeter C, Byrd TF. Mycobacterium abscessusGlycopeptidolipids Mask Underlying Cell Wall Phosphatidyl-myo-Inositol Mannosides Blocking Induction of Human Macrophage TNF-α by Preventing Interaction with TLR2. J Immunol. 2009;183(3):1997–2007. pmid:19596998
  31. 31. Hunter RL, Olsen MR, Jagannath C, Actor JK. Multiple roles of cord factor in the pathogenesis of primary, secondary, and cavitary tuberculosis, including a revised description of the pathology of secondary disease. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2006;36(4):371–386. pmid:17127724
  32. 32. Hunter RL, Olsen M, Jagannath C, Actor JK. Trehalose 6,6′-Dimycolate and Lipid in the Pathogenesis of Caseating Granulomas of Tuberculosis in Mice. Am J Pathol. 2006;168(4):1249–1261. pmid:16565499
  33. 33. Llorens-Fons M, Pérez-Trujillo M, Julián E, Brambilla C, Alcaide F, Byrd TF, et al. Trehalose Polyphleates, External Cell Wall Lipids in Mycobacterium abscessus, Are Associated with the Formation of Clumps with Cording Morphology, Which Have Been Associated with Virulence. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1402. pmid:28790995
  34. 34. Kam JY, Hortle E, Krogman E, Warner SE, Wright K, Luo K, et al. Rough and smooth variants of Mycobacterium abscessus are differentially controlled by host immunity during chronic infection of adult zebrafish. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):952. pmid:35177649
  35. 35. Clary G, Sasindran SJ, Nesbitt N, Mason L, Cole S, Azad A, et al. Mycobacterium abscessus Smooth and Rough Morphotypes Form Antimicrobial-Tolerant Biofilm Phenotypes but Are Killed by Acetic Acid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(3):e01782–e01717, pmid:29311080
  36. 36. Greendyke R, Byrd TF. Differential Antibiotic Susceptibility of Mycobacterium abscessus Variants in Biofilms and Macrophages Compared to That of Planktonic Bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008. pmid:18378709
  37. 37. Fennelly KP, Ojano-Dirain C, Yang Q, Liu L, Lu L, Progulske-Fox A, et al. Biofilm Formation by Mycobacterium abscessus in a Lung Cavity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(6):692–693. pmid:26731090
  38. 38. Qvist T, Eickhardt S, Kragh KN, Andersen CB, Iversen M, Hoiby N, et al. Chronic pulmonary disease with Mycobacterium abscessus complex is a biofilm infection. Eur Respir J. 2015;46(6):1823–1826. Epub 2015/10/24. pmid:26493807.
  39. 39. Rindi L. Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Nontuberculous Mycobacteria. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(12):4191. pmid:32545436
  40. 40. Gutiérrez AV, Richard M, Roquet-Banères F, Viljoen A, Kremer L. The TetR Family Transcription Factor MAB_2299c Regulates the Expression of Two Distinct MmpS-MmpL Efflux Pumps Involved in Cross-Resistance to Clofazimine and Bedaquiline in Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(10). pmid:31332077
  41. 41. Nasiri MJ, Haeili M, Ghazi M, Goudarzi H, Pormohammad A, Imani Fooladi AA, et al. New Insights in to the Intrinsic and Acquired Drug Resistance Mechanisms in Mycobacteria. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:681. Epub 2017/05/11. pmid:28487675.
  42. 42. Domenech P, Reed MB, Barry CE. Contribution of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis MmpL Protein Family to Virulence and Drug Resistance. Infect Immun. 2005;73(6):3492–3501.
  43. 43. Melly G, Purdy G. MmpL Proteins in Physiology and Pathogenesis of M. tuberculosis. Microorganisms. 2019;7(3):70. pmid:30841535
  44. 44. Viljoen A, Dubois V, Girard-Misguich F, Blaise M, Herrmann J-L, Kremer L. The diverse family of MmpL transporters in mycobacteria: from regulation to antimicrobial developments. Mol Microbiol. 2017;104(6):889–904. pmid:28340510
  45. 45. Richard M, Gutiérrez AV, Viljoen A, Rodriguez-Rincon D, Roquet-Baneres F, Blaise M, et al. Mutations in the MAB_2299c TetR Regulator Confer Cross-Resistance to Clofazimine and Bedaquiline in Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(1). pmid:30323043
  46. 46. Richard M, Gutiérrez AV, Viljoen AJ, Ghigo E, Blaise M, Kremer L. Mechanistic and Structural Insights Into the Unique TetR-Dependent Regulation of a Drug Efflux Pump in Mycobacterium abscessus. Front Microbiol. 2018;9.
  47. 47. Hershko Y, Adler A, Barkan D, Meir M. Glycopeptidolipid Defects Leading to Rough Morphotypes of Mycobacterium abscessus Do Not Confer Clinical Antibiotic Resistance. Microbiology Spectrum. 2023:e0527022. pmid:36722959
  48. 48. Costa TRD, Felisberto-Rodrigues C, Meir A, Prevost MS, Redzej A, Trokter M, et al. Secretion systems in Gram-negative bacteria: structural and mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(6):343–359. pmid:25978706
  49. 49. Abdallah AM, Gey Van Pittius NC, Digiuseppe Champion PA, Cox J, Luirink J, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJE, et al. Type VII secretion—mycobacteria show the way. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5(11):883–891. pmid:17922044
  50. 50. Rivera-Calzada A, Famelis N, Llorca O, Geibel S. Type VII secretion systems: structure, functions and transport models. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(9):567–584. pmid:34040228
  51. 51. Lagune M, Petit C, Sotomayor FV, Johansen MD, Beckham KSH, Ritter C, et al. Conserved and specialized functions of Type VII secretion systems in non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Microbiology (Reading, England). 2021;167(7). pmid:34224347
  52. 52. Gröschel MI, Sayes F, Simeone R, Majlessi L, Brosch R. ESX secretion systems: mycobacterial evolution to counter host immunity. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(11):677–691. pmid:27665717
  53. 53. Houben D, Demangel C, Van Ingen J, Perez J, Baldeón L, Abdallah AM, et al. ESX-1-mediated translocation to the cytosol controls virulence of mycobacteria. Cell Microbiol. 2012;14(8):1287–1298. pmid:22524898
  54. 54. Augenstreich J, Arbues A, Simeone R, Haanappel E, Wegener A, Sayes F, et al. ESX-1 and phthiocerol dimycocerosates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis act in concert to cause phagosomal rupture and host cell apoptosis. Cell Microbiol. 2017;19(7):e12726. pmid:28095608
  55. 55. Mehra A, Zahra A, Thompson V, Sirisaengtaksin N, Wells A, Porto M, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Type VII Secreted Effector EsxH Targets Host ESCRT to Impair Trafficking. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(10):e1003734. pmid:24204276
  56. 56. Mittal E, Skowyra ML, Uwase G, Tinaztepe E, Mehra A, Köster S, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Type VII Secretion System Effectors Differentially Impact the ESCRT Endomembrane Damage Response. MBio. 2018;9(6):e01765–e01718. pmid:30482832
  57. 57. Ates LS, Ummels R, Commandeur S, Van Der Weerd R, Sparrius M, Weerdenburg E, et al. Essential Role of the ESX-5 Secretion System in Outer Membrane Permeability of Pathogenic Mycobacteria. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(5):e1005190. pmid:25938982
  58. 58. Abdallah AM, Savage NDL, Van Zon M, Wilson L, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJE, Van Der Wel NN, et al. The ESX-5 Secretion System of Mycobacterium marinum Modulates the Macrophage Response. J Immunol. 2008;181(10):7166–7175. pmid:18981138
  59. 59. Ripoll F, Pasek S, Schenowitz C, Dossat C, Barbe V, Rottman M, et al. Non Mycobacterial Virulence Genes in the Genome of the Emerging Pathogen Mycobacterium abscessus. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(6):e5660. pmid:19543527
  60. 60. Bunduc CM, Fahrenkamp D, Wald J, Ummels R, Bitter W, Houben ENG, et al. Structure and dynamics of a mycobacterial type VII secretion system. Nature. 2021;593(7859):445–448. Epub 2021/05/14. pmid:33981042.
  61. 61. Beckham KSH, Ritter C, Chojnowski G, Ziemianowicz DS, Mullapudi E, Rettel M, et al. Structure of the mycobacterial ESX-5 type VII secretion system pore complex. Sci Adv. 2021;7(26). Epub 2021/06/27. pmid:34172453.
  62. 62. Poweleit N, Czudnochowski N, Nakagawa R, Trinidad DD, Murphy KC, Sassetti CM, et al. The structure of the endogenous ESX-3 secretion system. eLife. 2019:8. pmid:31886769
  63. 63. Famelis N, Rivera-Calzada A, Degliesposti G, Wingender M, Mietrach N, Skehel JM, et al. Architecture of the ESX-3/Type VII secretion system. Nature. 2019;576(7786):321–325.
  64. 64. Newton-Foot M, Warren RM, Sampson SL, Van Helden PD, Gey Van Pittius NC. The plasmid-mediated evolution of the mycobacterial ESX (Type VII) secretion systems. BMC Evol Biol. 2016;16(1). pmid:26979252
  65. 65. Lagune M, Le Moigne V, Johansen MD, Vásquez Sotomayor F, Daher W, Petit C, et al. The ESX-4 substrates, EsxU and EsxT, modulate Mycobacterium abscessus fitness. PLoS Pathog. 2022;18(8):e1010771. pmid:35960766
  66. 66. Maciąg A, Piazza A, Riccardi G, Milano A. Transcriptional analysis of ESAT-6 cluster 3 in Mycobacterium smegmatis. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9(1):48. pmid:19257911
  67. 67. Siegrist MS, Unnikrishnan M, Mcconnell MJ, Borowsky M, Cheng T-Y, Siddiqi N, et al. Mycobacterial Esx-3 is required for mycobactin-mediated iron acquisition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(44):18792–18797. pmid:19846780
  68. 68. Tinaztepe E, Wei J-R, Raynowska J, Portal-Celhay C, Thompson V, Philips JA. Role of Metal-Dependent Regulation of ESX-3 Secretion in Intracellular Survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 2016;84(8):2255–2263. pmid:27245412
  69. 69. Tiwari BM, Kannan N, Vemu L, Raghunand TR. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis PE Proteins Rv0285 and Rv1386 Modulate Innate Immunity and Mediate Bacillary Survival in Macrophages. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e51686. pmid:23284742
  70. 70. Tufariello JM, Chapman JR, Kerantzas CA, Wong K-W, Vilchèze C, Jones CM, et al. Separable roles for Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESX-3 effectors in iron acquisition and virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(3):E348–E357. pmid:26729876
  71. 71. Kim YS, Yang C-S, Nguyen LT, Kim JK, Jin HS, Choe JH, et al. Mycobacterium abscessus ESX-3 plays an important role in host inflammatory and pathological responses during infection. Microbes Infect. 2017;19(1):5–17. pmid:27637463
  72. 72. Osman MM, Pagán AJ, Shanahan JK, Ramakrishnan L. Mycobacterium marinum phthiocerol dimycocerosates enhance macrophage phagosomal permeabilization and membrane damage. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7):e0233252. pmid:32701962
  73. 73. Ates LS, Van Der Woude AD, Bestebroer J, Van Stempvoort G, Musters RJP, Garcia-Vallejo JJ, et al. The ESX-5 System of Pathogenic Mycobacteria Is Involved In Capsule Integrity and Virulence through Its Substrate PPE10. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(6):e1005696. pmid:27280885
  74. 74. Lai L-Y, Lin T-L, Chen Y-Y, Hsieh P-F, Wang J-T. Role of the Mycobacterium marinum ESX-1 Secretion System in Sliding Motility and Biofilm Formation. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1160. pmid:29899738
  75. 75. Nath Y, Ray SK, Buragohain AK. Essential role of the ESX-3 associated eccD3 locus in maintaining the cell wall integrity of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Int J Med Microbiol. 2018;308(7):784–795. pmid:30257807
  76. 76. Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, et al. An Official ATS/IDSA Statement: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175(4):367–416. pmid:17277290
  77. 77. Lee M-R, Yang C-Y, Chang K-P, Keng L-T, Yen DH-T, Wang J-Y, et al. Factors Associated with Lung Function Decline in Patients with Non-Tuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e58214. pmid:23483998
  78. 78. Martiniano SL, Nick JA, Daley CL. Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections in Cystic Fibrosis. Thorac Surg Clin. 2019;29(1):95–108. pmid:30454926
  79. 79. Viviani L, Harrison MJ, Zolin A, Haworth CS, Floto RA. Epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) amongst individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF). J Cyst Fibros. 2016;15(5):619–623. pmid:27050794
  80. 80. Welsh MRBW, Accurso FJ, Cutting GR. Cystic fibrosis. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, Childs B, Vogelstein B, eds. The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease. 8th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw Hill; 2001. p. 5121–5188.
    • 81. Di A, Brown ME, Deriy LV, Li C, Szeto FL, Chen Y, et al. CFTR regulates phagosome acidification in macrophages and alters bactericidal activity. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8(9):933–944. pmid:16921366
    • 82. Bernut A, Dupont C, Ogryzko NV, Neyret A, Herrmann J-L, Floto RA, et al. CFTR Protects against Mycobacterium abscessus Infection by Fine-Tuning Host Oxidative Defenses. Cell Rep. 2019;26(7):1828–1840.e4. pmid:30759393
    • 83. Ryan K, Byrd TF. Mycobacterium abscessus: Shapeshifter of the Mycobacterial World. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2642. pmid:30443245
    • 84. Qvist T, Taylor-Robinson D, Waldmann E, Olesen HV, Hansen CR, Mathiesen IH, et al. Comparing the harmful effects of nontuberculous mycobacteria and Gram negative bacteria on lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2016;15(3):380–385. pmid:26482717
    • 85. Davidson LB, Nessar R, Kempaiah P, Perkins DJ, Byrd TF. Mycobacterium abscessus Glycopeptidolipid Prevents Respiratory Epithelial TLR2 Signaling as Measured by HβD2 Gene Expression and IL-8 Release. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(12):e29148. pmid:22216191
    • 86. Halloum I, Carrère-Kremer S, Blaise M, Viljoen A, Bernut A, Le Moigne V, et al. Deletion of a dehydratase important for intracellular growth and cording renders rough Mycobacterium abscessus avirulent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(29):E4228–E4237. pmid:27385830
    • 87. Esther CR, Esserman DA, Gilligan P, Kerr A, Noone PG. Chronic Mycobacterium abscessus infection and lung function decline in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2010;9(2):117–123. pmid:20071249
    • 88. Koh W-J, Jeong B-H, Kim S-Y, Jeon K, Park KU, Jhun BW, et al. Mycobacterial Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes in Mycobacterium abscessus Lung Disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(3):309–316. pmid:28011608
    • 89. Luthra S, Rominski A, Sander P. The Role of Antibiotic-Target-Modifying and Antibiotic-Modifying Enzymes in Mycobacterium abscessus Drug Resistance. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2179. pmid:30258428
    • 90. Hunt-Serracin AC, Parks BJ, Boll J, Boutte CC. Mycobacterium abscessus Cells Have Altered Antibiotic Tolerance and Surface Glycolipids in Artificial Cystic Fibrosis Sputum Medium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(7). pmid:31010859
    • 91. Gloag ES, Wozniak DJ, Stoodley P, Hall-Stoodley L. Mycobacterium abscessus biofilms have viscoelastic properties which may contribute to their recalcitrance in chronic pulmonary infections. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5020. pmid:33658597
    • 92. Gillan JL, Davidson DJ, Gray RD. Targeting Cystic Fibrosis Inflammation in the Age of CFTR Modulators: Focus on Macrophages. Eur Respir J. 2020:2003502.
    • 93. Bernut A, Loynes CA, Floto RA, Renshaw SA. Deletion of cftr Leads to an Excessive Neutrophilic Response and Defective Tissue Repair in a Zebrafish Model of Sterile Inflammation. Front Immunol. 2020;11.
    • 94. Rieber N, Hector A, Carevic M, Hartl D. Current concepts of immune dysregulation in cystic fibrosis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014;52:108–112. pmid:24495876