Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeWhat about the role of medical schools?
Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:34 GMT
Author: Jonathan Leo
Position: Associate Professor
Institution: Lincoln Memorial University
E-mail: jonathan.leo@lmunet.edu
Submitted Date: February 04, 2009
Published Date: February 6, 2009
This comment was originally posted as a “Reader Response” on the publication date indicated above. All Reader Responses are now available as comments.
Here is an experiment: Try explaining to a faculty member in the humanities that professors in medical schools are allowed to list ghostwritten articles on their curriculum vitaes - documents which they use to move through the professorial ranks. Most non-medical school faculty have a hard time understanding how this practice is accepted, especially since a student would probably be expelled for doing the same thing. A relatively simple step to curing the ghostwriting problem would be for medical schools to have a statement in their faculty handbooks that, for advancement through the ranks, faculty members are forbidden to list ghostwritten articles on their CVs. Given the simplicity of this solution, one wonders why it hasn't been done already.