Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

Apparent band duplication: Figure S2

Posted by jaimetex on 05 Mar 2016 at 12:02 GMT

In January, 2015, a query about apparent band duplications appeared at PubPeer related to supplementary figure S2:
https://pubpeer.com/publi...

Could the authors and/or PLOS editors please verify/confirm whether bands in At3g0182 and At2g28080 are different. A formal response at PubPeer would be welcomed.

No competing interests declared.

RE: Apparent band duplication: Figure S2

RaviPalanivelu replied to jaimetex on 04 Aug 2016 at 21:06 GMT

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

We identified the source of the error and worked with PLoS Genetics to fix the errors in supplementary figure S2. A formal correction, which will permanently accompany the article, has been issued: http://journals.plos.org/...

No competing interests declared.