http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9757-3088
Figures
Abstract
Background
Celiac disease (CD), a serious autoimmune disorder that occurs in people who are genetically predisposed, is induced by dietary gluten intake and affects primarily the small intestine. Many studies have identified an increased risk of cardiovascular problems in patients with CD. Moreover, these patients are susceptible to certain liver diseases, as well as fibrosis.
Objective
The aim of this study was to assess the presence of fibrosis using the De Ritis ratio, determining its effect on the electromechanical features of the left atrium and its susceptibility to atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with CD.
Methods
A total of 97 patients diagnosed with CD by antibody test and biopsy were included in this prospective study. Two groups were created from these patients, a fibrosis-prone (FP) group and a non-fibrosis-prone (NFP) group, according to the cut-off value, as defined in previously published reports, for the AST/ALT ratio. Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic examinations were performed as part of the study.
Results
There were no differences in the baseline characteristics and conventional echocardiographic parameters of the defined groups. However, the patients in the FP group, as compared to those in the NFP group, had significantly increased PWD (56.68±6.48 ms vs. 37.49±6.22 ms, P<0.001). Additionally, significantly higher interatrial (60.50±13.05 ms vs. 29.40±11.55 ms, P<0.001), intra-left atrial (44.18±14.12 ms vs. 21.02±11.99 ms, P<0.001), and intra-right atrial (15.61±8.91 ms vs. 8.38±4.50 ms, P<0.001) EMD was found among the patients in the FP group compared to that of the NFP group.
Conclusion
It is believed that the susceptibility to AF cited in previous studies may be related to fibrosis. Our study is the first to examine the possible effects of fibrosis on AF susceptibility in patients with CD, whereby we propose a new biomarker for prediction of AF susceptibility of these patients.
Citation: Kucukseymen S, Cekin AH, Bayar N, Arslan S, Uygur Kucukseymen E, Mercan T, et al. (2018) A novel biomarker for prediction of atrial fibrillation susceptibility in patients with celiac disease. PLoS ONE 13(1): e0190382. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190382
Editor: Tomohiko Ai, Indiana University, UNITED STATES
Received: April 29, 2017; Accepted: December 13, 2017; Published: January 9, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Kucukseymen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: We have uploaded the minimal data set necessary to replicate our study's findings as Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Celiac disease (CD) is a multisystem, chronic immune-mediated disorder that affects several organs [1]. CD causes a number of gastrointestinal problems, such as diarrhea, abdominal distention and malabsorption, due to the intake of grain proteins, which are collectively referred to as a “gluten” diet [1, 2]. Cardiovascular symptoms, like arrhythmias or irregular heartbeats, coronary artery diseases, and possible heart failure, have also been also reported to be associated with CD [2–6]. Some studies have indicated that these symptoms are caused by inflammation, while others have suggested the involvement of the autoimmune system response [7–10]. CD patients also have a higher susceptibility to liver diseases, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [11]. Here it is important to note that NAFLD and other liver diseases may progress to cirrhosis of the liver, and fibrosis is the basic pathophysiological mechanism for cirrhosis [12, 13].
In the literature, there are five scoring systems that are used to demonstrate fibrosis in liver diseases. These include the aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) ratio, the AST to platelet ratio index, and the BARD, FIB-4 and NAFLD fibrosis scores [14–18]. Among these, the AST/ALT ratio (AAR), also referred to as the De Ritis ratio, is particularly valuable, as it is a non-invasive, easy and reliable scoring system for the determination of fibrosis [16, 19]. In studies conducted on patients with high AAR scores, fibrosis, and consequently cirrhosis rates, were shown to be significantly higher [16, 19].
The development of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with CD has been shown to occur at a higher rate than that of normal, healthy individuals [3, 20], with inflammation having been suggested as the potential mechanism of increased AF susceptibility in patients with CD [7, 8, 10]. In this study, given that the fibrosis pathway has been identified as an important pathophysiological mechanism for the development of AF [21, 22] in the general population, we examine the interaction between fibrosis and AF susceptibility in CD patients. Thus, we sought to determine whether AAR, which is a fibrosis marker, can be used, as an alternative to inflammation markers, for the prediction of increased AF risk in patients with CD. Our study is the first to examine the fibrosis effects on AF in patients with CD, and thereby, to show the correlation of AAR with AF risk.
Materials and methods
Patient selection
A total of 105 consecutive patients with serology (plasma anti-tissue transglutaminase and anti-endomysial antibodies) and biopsy-proven CD were recruited from the University of Health Sciences, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Gastroenterology clinic. Patients were excluded if they had any other liver diseases or gastrointestinal diseases, diabetes mellitus, kidney diseases, or thyroid dysfunction, or if they consumed alcohol. From the study population, 3 patients were excluded due to DM (HbA1c >6%), 2 patients due to having an active infection (CRP >3.15 mg/dl), 1 patient due to thyroid dysfunction (outside of normal limits of T4 and T3 hormones), and 2 patients due to alcohol consumption (as discovered from a questionnaire). Therefore, the study began with 97 patients. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Health Sciences, Antalya Education and Research Hospital Ethics Committee. In addition, the patients signed consent forms after being provided information about the study, including its purpose.
The CD-diagnosed patients were divided into two groups according to the cut-off point of 0.8 for AAR, which has been established in previously published reports [17]. Patients whose cut-off value was higher than 0.8 were placed in the fibrosis-proven group (FP), while the others were assigned to the non-fibrosis-proven (NFP) group. The FP group consisted of 44 (56.1% female) patients, and the NFP group, 53 (52.83% female) patients. Heart rate and blood pressure were measured in all patients.
Electrocardiographic examination
A 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) recording (Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan) was performed on the patients in both groups. The onset of the P wave was defined as the point of first visible upward slope from baseline for positive waveforms and as the point of first downward slope from baseline for negative waveforms. The return to the baseline was considered the end of the P wave. The maximum P wave duration (Pmax), measured by hand on paper in all of the 12 leads, was used as the longest atrial conduction time. In contrast, the minimum P wave duration (Pmin), measured by hand on paper in all of the 12 leads, was used as the shortest atrial conduction time. PWD was defined as the difference between the Pmax and the Pmin [23].
Echocardiographic examination
All patients underwent 2-dimensional, M-mode, pulsed, and color flow Doppler echocardiographic examinations (Philips EPIQ 7 Cardiac Ultrasound, Bothell, WA, USA). During echocardiography, a single-lead electrocardiogram was recorded simultaneously. Data were recorded from the average of three cardiac cycles. Next, a tissue Doppler echocardiography, with transducer frequencies of 3.5–4.0 MHz, was performed by adjusting the spectral pulsed- Doppler signal filters until a Nyquist limit of 15 to 20 cm/s was reached using the minimal optimal gain. The monitor sweep speed was set at 100 mm/s. In the apical four-chamber view, the pulsed-Doppler sample volume was placed at the level of LV lateral mitral annulus, septal mitral annulus, and RV tricuspid annulus. Atrial electromechanical coupling (PA), the time interval from the onset of the P-wave on the surface electrocardiogram to the beginning of the late diastolic wave (A), was obtained from the lateral mitral annulus (PA lateral), septal mitral annulus (PA septal), and tricuspid annulus (PA tricuspid) (Fig 1). The difference between PA lateral and PA tricuspid was defined as the interatrial electromechanical delay (EMD); the difference between PA septal and PA tricuspid was defined as the intra-right atrial EMD; and the difference between PA septal and PA lateral was defined as the intra-left atrial EMD [24, 25].
Atrial electromechanical coupling (PA’); the time interval from the onset of the P-wave on the surface electrocardiogram to the beginning of the late diastolic wave A’ [in a patient with CD (A) and normal individual (B).
Measuring laboratory parameters
Routine biochemical tests and complete blood count (CBC) were performed from antecubital venous sampling after 12 hours of fasting. The blood samples were centrifuged and serum samples were collected. The CRP levels (normal range: 0–5 mg/L) were analyzed with a Beckman Coulter analyzer. (Image 800; Fullerton, CA, USA). CBC, including white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts, was performed using an automated CBC device (Abbott Cell-Dyn, Abbott Park, IL, USA). The neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was calculated using data obtained from the CBC.
Statistical analysis
Statistical evaluations were performed using SPSS 24 for Windows (SPSS INC., Chicago, IL, USA). All results were first subjected to a normality test, and once passed; they were analyzed by the Shapiro-Wilk test and Student t test. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Mann-Whitney U-test was used for non-normally distributed variables. Variables were described as mean ± standard deviation, and nominal variables were expressed as percentage. The chi-square test was used for nominal variables. To compare the groups, Student’s t-test for mean value and box-and-whisker plot for median, maximum and minimum values of left EMD, right EMD and inter-atrial EMD were performed. Next correlation between EMD values and AST/ALT ratios was analyzed and R values were determined for each region of atria by Spearman’s correlation test. P values less than 0.05 were considered statically significant.
Results
A total of 97 patients with CD participated in this prospective study. The baseline characteristics of both groups are shown in Table 1. In comparing both groups, there were no statistically significant differences found regarding age, gender, percentage of patients who smoked, body mass index, hyperlipidemia, high sensitive C reactive protein (hsCRP), NLR, total bilirubin, gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and blood pressure (p>0.05).
Among the conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiographic parameters, the left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, interventricular septum thickness, posterior wall thickness, left atrial diameter, LV end-diastolic diameter, LV end-systolic diameter and LV diastolic function parameters, such as LV E/A ratio and LV isovolumetric relaxation time, were determined to be similar in the patients from both groups in Table 2.
Analyses performed to assess the electrical functions of the left atrium showed there to be a higher PWD (56.68±6.48 ms vs. 37.49±6.22 ms, P < 0.001) in the FP group than that in the NFP group. On the other hand, PA lateral, PA septal, and PA tricuspid (P < 0.001 for all) were significantly increased in FP group patients as compared to NFP group patients. Furthermore, FP group patients had significantly higher intra-left atrial EMD (44.18±14.12 ms vs. 21.02±11.99 ms, P<0.001), intra-right atrial EMD (15.61±8.91 ms vs. 8.38±4.50 ms, P<0.001) and interatrial EMD (60.50±13.05 ms vs. 29.40±11.55 ms, P<0.001) in Table 3. These differences are clearly shown for each EMD in a box and whisker plot graph. However the correlation between EMD values and AST/ALT ratio of right atria was relatively low while it was significantly higher for left atria and inter-atrial measurements (Fig 2).
(A) Differences between each EMDs in NFP and FP groups have been clearly shown in the box and whisker diagram. (B) Correlation analysis between atrial EMD values and AST/ALT ratio (AAR).
Discussion
CD is a chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal system that is characterized by chronic malabsorption in sensitive individuals who ingest grains containing gluten [1, 26]. The worldwide prevalence of CD is 1% in the general population, but in patients with autoimmune disorders the prevalence is higher than that of the normal population (8–20%) [1, 2]. Small intestinal villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia are the main pathological findings in pediatric cases, whereas, lymphocytic infiltration, with or without the aforementioned symptoms, is more common in the adult form of the disease [1, 27].
Recent studies have shown that patients with CD may have a higher prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVD), such as arrhythmia, atherosclerotic coronary disease and heart failure, compared to the general population. While the CVD risk factors are not well defined in CD[3, 4, 26, 28, 29], the risk of atrial fibrillation is the most pronounced among these factors [3, 20]. Consistent with this, in a study conducted by Emilsson et al., a significantly higher atrial fibrillation (AF) risk than that seen in the normal population was reported in CD patients [3]. Furthermore, in another study by Emilsson et al., a remarkable increase in tendency toward dilated cardiomyopathy and cardiovascular death, as well as in AF risks, in patients with CD was reported [30]. Likewise, we too found increased AF risk in CD patients [20]. This increased risk of AF has been attributed primarily to the increase of inflammatory markers and autoimmunity in previously published studies.
It is well-known that CD patients have increased risk for AF, but in this study, the fundamental aim was to identify which CD patients in particular are at greater risk. Therefore, this study did not include any AF-diagnosed patients. However, in CD patients, there is the same degree of risk of AF, or paroxysmal AF, which is one of the AF forms [31]. There are different methods for predicting AF risk [31, 32]. Although most of the related studies conducted have aimed to detect the predictors of AF recurrence, none of the parameters have been able to predict with 100% accuracy [33]. New parameters, therefore, continue to be investigated for predicting the recurrence of AF precisely. Electrocardiography (ECG) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) are commonly used to carry out these investigations [24, 25, 34, 35]. In ECG, P wave dispersion (PWD) constitutes a recent contribution to non-invasive electrocardiology [23, 34]. As this electrocardiographic measurement reflects a disparity in atrial conduction, it has been proposed as a predictor for AF in studies on PWD [23]. Similarly, in our study, we calculated all PWD values for prediction of AF risk in the ECG of patients. Patients in the FP group had a higher rate of PWD, which implied higher arrhythmia susceptibility.
Another commonly used estimation parameter is the tissue Doppler echocardiography (TDI), which is one of the TTE procedures. With the TDI, the left atrial electromechanical delay (EMD) times can be calculated [20, 24, 25]. Relevant to this, in studies related with EMD, such as those conducted by Ari et al. and Akil et al., EMD is commonly suggested as a useful parameter for prediction of AF onsets and relapses [25]. There are three EMD types; interatrial, intra-left and intra-right [24]. The following EMD parameters can be calculated: atrial electromechanical coupling (PA’), and the time interval from the onset of the P-wave on the surface electrocardiogram to the beginning of the late diastolic wave A’ [23]. As the prediction of AF is also important for determining risk of stroke, these methods are actively used for the evaluation of stroke patients, and if this risk is found to be high, cardioembolic events should be examined. In our study, we calculated all EMD parameters for prediction of AF risk in both groups. As with the ECG findings, we found all the EMD parameters to be higher in the FP group, which may infer high susceptibility to fibrosis risk.
Current findings suggest that fibrosis and inflammation are important risk factors for AF [7–9, 21, 22]. However, in CD patients, AF risk is associated primarily with inflammation that presents with significant increase in CRP, IL6, and TNF-alpha [6, 27, 36]. Numerous studies, including those by Aviles et al., Hu et al., and Boos et al., have examined the correlation between inflammation and AF risks in detail, and as result, the association between inflammation and AF has been unequivocally confirmed [7, 10]. On the other hand, the fibrosis pathway can also serve as an important factor for predicting this risk [17, 22]. Considering this, we performed an extensive review of the literature to learn more about the relationship between fibrosis and CD. Interestingly, we found strong evidence to infer a connection between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and CD, a connection which has been discussed comprehensively by Reilly et al. [11]. According to previous studies, CD is also associated with different liver diseases, some of which are related to fibrosis, including hepatobiliary disorders, asymptomatic elevations of liver enzyme levels, NAFLD, autoimmune hepatobiliary disorders, autoimmune hepatitis and cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, miscellaneous hepatobiliary disorders in CD, hepatic vein obstruction, noncirrhotic portal hypertension, and end-stage liver disease. Considering that NAFLD is known to be a secondary disease in the pathology of cirrhosis [12, 13], we decided to examine fibrosis parameters in CD patients. There are numerous non-invasive methods that can be used for the prediction of fibrosis, including the AST/ALT ratio (AAR), APRI, FIB4 and the NAFLD fibrosis score [13, 14, 16–18]. For the aim of the study, it was important that we choose a parameter that has been used in predicting cardiovascular diseases [19, 37–41]. Therefore, we used AAR for the prediction of fibrosis risk in CD patients. Next, we used the cut-off value of 0.8 for AAR, which was based on recently published, large-scale trials, like the Framingham Heart Study [14]. The CD patients were then divided into two groups according to their cut-off value for AAR. Patients with a value ≥ 0.8 were placed in the FP-designated group, while the others were placed in the NFP-designated group. We went on to compare them according to selected parameters for prediction of AF risks. The results of this comparison allowed us to find the main reason for high AF risk and the method for predicting it in patients with CD.
While there are studies in the literature similar to our study [3, 20], our research is the first to make comparisons among CD patients. Although we know from the literature that CD patients are more susceptible to AF than the general population [20, 24], we propose an alternative tool for estimation of the probability of AF in CD patients. Moreover, our study included more patients than previous studies [20, 24] and serves as a subgroup study particularly pertaining to CD patients. According to our study results, CD patients are susceptible to fibrosis, and the fibrosis rate associated with this susceptibility can be obtained by determining AAR values. Otherwise stated, susceptibility to AF increases in patients who have high AAR values.
Some limitations of our study should be noted. This study is a single-center, nonrandomized study and the population was relatively small. The other limitation is that ultrasound/biopsy was not performed to examine the presence of liver diseases which is unknown for patients with normal enzyme level. Finally further studies included larger population scales are needed to show the accuracy of this hypothesis unequivocally.
Conclusion
In the celiac disease population, there is the risk of cardiovascular diseases. EMD, which is a respected predictor of AF, increases in CD patients. However, the inflammation pathway may not be the only culprit for this delay. Fibrosis may be equally as responsible as the inflammation pathway. Our study is the first to demonstrate the fibrosis effects on AF susceptibility in patients with CD. These finding are clinically relevant particularly for CD patients with paroxysmal AF. However, large-scale prospective cohort studies conducted by multiple medical centers are strongly necessary to clarify the effectiveness of fibrosis and AAR value for prediction of AF susceptibility in patients with CD.
References
- 1. Green PH, Cellier C. Celiac disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2007;357(17):1731–43. pmid:17960014.
- 2. Peters U, Askling J, Gridley G, Ekbom A, Linet M. Causes of death in patients with celiac disease in a population-based Swedish cohort. Archives of internal medicine. 2003;163(13):1566–72. pmid:12860579.
- 3. Emilsson L, Smith JG, West J, Melander O, Ludvigsson JF. Increased risk of atrial fibrillation in patients with coeliac disease: a nationwide cohort study. European heart journal. 2011;32(19):2430–7. pmid:21653560.
- 4. Jansen H, Willenborg C, Schlesinger S, Ferrario PG, Konig IR, Erdmann J, et al. Genetic variants associated with celiac disease and the risk for coronary artery disease. Molecular genetics and genomics: MGG. 2015;290(5):1911–7. pmid:25893417.
- 5. Bayar N, Cagirci G, Ureyen CM, Kus G, Kucukseymen S, Arslan S. The Relationship between Spontaneous Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Dissection and Celiac Disease. Korean circulation journal. 2015;45(3):242–4. pmid:26023313; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4446819.
- 6. Sari C, Bayram NA, Dogan FE, Bastug S, Bolat AD, Sari SO, et al. The evaluation of endothelial functions in patients with celiac disease. Echocardiography. 2012;29(4):471–7. pmid:22150763.
- 7. Hu YF, Chen YJ, Lin YJ, Chen SA. Inflammation and the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation. Nature reviews Cardiology. 2015;12(4):230–43. pmid:25622848.
- 8. Van Wagoner DR. Oxidative stress and inflammation in atrial fibrillation: role in pathogenesis and potential as a therapeutic target. Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology. 2008;52(4):306–13. pmid:18791466.
- 9. Boos CJ, Anderson RA, Lip GY. Is atrial fibrillation an inflammatory disorder? European heart journal. 2006;27(2):136–49. pmid:16278230.
- 10. Aviles RJ, Martin DO, Apperson-Hansen C, Houghtaling PL, Rautaharju P, Kronmal RA, et al. Inflammation as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2003;108(24):3006–10. pmid:14623805.
- 11. Reilly NR, Lebwohl B, Hultcrantz R, Green PH, Ludvigsson JF. Increased risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after diagnosis of celiac disease. Journal of hepatology. 2015;62(6):1405–11. pmid:25617505; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4439270.
- 12. Farrell GC, Larter CZ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from steatosis to cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2006;43(2 Suppl 1):S99–S112. pmid:16447287.
- 13. Dowman JK, Tomlinson JW, Newsome PN. Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. QJM: monthly journal of the Association of Physicians. 2010;103(2):71–83. pmid:19914930; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2810391.
- 14. Long MT, Pedley A, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Fox CS. The Association between Non-Invasive Hepatic Fibrosis Markers and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in the Framingham Heart Study. PloS one. 2016;11(6):e0157517. pmid:27341207; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4920364.
- 15. Long MT, Wang N, Larson MG, Mitchell GF, Palmisano J, Vasan RS, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and vascular function: cross-sectional analysis in the Framingham heart study. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2015;35(5):1284–91. pmid:25745056; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4520415.
- 16. McPherson S, Stewart SF, Henderson E, Burt AD, Day CP. Simple non-invasive fibrosis scoring systems can reliably exclude advanced fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2010;59(9):1265–9. pmid:20801772.
- 17. Sesti G, Sciacqua A, Fiorentino TV, Perticone M, Succurro E, Perticone F. Association between noninvasive fibrosis markers and cardio-vascular organ damage among adults with hepatic steatosis. PloS one. 2014;9(8):e104941. pmid:25111713; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4128729.
- 18. Kruger FC, Daniels CR, Kidd M, Swart G, Brundyn K, van Rensburg C, et al. APRI: a simple bedside marker for advanced fibrosis that can avoid liver biopsy in patients with NAFLD/NASH. South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde. 2011;101(7):477–80. pmid:21920102.
- 19. Botros M, Sikaris KA. The de ritis ratio: the test of time. The Clinical biochemist Reviews. 2013;34(3):117–30. pmid:24353357; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3866949.
- 20. Bayar N, Cekin AH, Arslan S, Cagirci G, Erkal Z, Cay S, et al. Assessment of Left Atrial Function in Patients with Celiac Disease. Echocardiography. 2015;32(12):1802–8. pmid:25923824.
- 21. Dzeshka MS, Lip GY, Snezhitskiy V, Shantsila E. Cardiac Fibrosis in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2015;66(8):943–59. pmid:26293766.
- 22. Burstein B, Nattel S. Atrial fibrosis: mechanisms and clinical relevance in atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008;51(8):802–9. pmid:18294563.
- 23. Elmoniem AA, El-Hefny N, Wadi W. P Wave Dispersion (PWD) as a predictor of Atrial Fibrillation (AF). International journal of health sciences. 2011;5(2 Suppl 1):25–6. pmid:23284566; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3533341.
- 24. Efe TH, Ertem AG, Coskun Y, Bilgin M, Algul E, Beton O, et al. Atrial Electromechanical Properties in Coeliac Disease. Heart, lung & circulation. 2016;25(2):160–5. pmid:26412487.
- 25. Akil MA, Akil E, Bilik MZ, Oylumlu M, Acet H, Yildiz A, et al. The relationship between atrial electromechanical delay and left atrial mechanical function in stroke patients. Anatolian journal of cardiology. 2015;15(7):565–70. pmid:25537998.
- 26. Stein AC, Liao C, Paski S, Polonsky T, Semrad CE, Kupfer SS. Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk in Adults With Celiac Disease. Journal of clinical gastroenterology. 2016;50(7):545–50. pmid:26444646.
- 27. Ferretti G, Bacchetti T, Masciangelo S, Saturni L. Celiac disease, inflammation and oxidative damage: a nutrigenetic approach. Nutrients. 2012;4(4):243–57. pmid:22606367; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3347005.
- 28. Assa A, Frenkel-Nir Y, Tzur D, Katz LH, Shamir R. Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Adolescents With Celiac Disease: A Cross Sectional Population Based Study. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. 2016. pmid:27906796.
- 29. Bayar N, Cekin AH, Arslan S, Cagirci G, Kucukseymen S, Cay S, et al. Assessment of Aortic Elasticity in Patients with Celiac Disease. Korean circulation journal. 2016;46(2):239–45. pmid:27014355; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4805569.
- 30. Emilsson L, Andersson B, Elfstrom P, Green PH, Ludvigsson JF. Risk of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in 29 000 patients with celiac disease. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2012;1(3):e001594. pmid:23130142; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3487325.
- 31. Boriani G, Pettorelli D. Atrial fibrillation burden and atrial fibrillation type: Clinical significance and impact on the risk of stroke and decision making for long-term anticoagulation. Vascular pharmacology. 2016;83:26–35. pmid:27196706.
- 32. Shahid F, Lip GY. Risk Stratification Models in Atrial Fibrillation. Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis. 2017. pmid:28129663.
- 33. Aras D, Maden O, Ozdemir O, Aras S, Topaloglu S, Yetkin E, et al. Simple electrocardiographic markers for the prediction of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in hyperthyroidism. International journal of cardiology. 2005;99(1):59–64. pmid:15721500.
- 34. Russo V, Di Meo F, Rago A, Papa AA, Molino A, Mosella M, et al. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients: P wave duration and dispersion analysis. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2015;19(7):1241–8. pmid:25912584.
- 35. Ari H, Ari S, Akkaya M, Aydin C, Emlek N, Sarigul OY, et al. Predictive value of atrial electromechanical delay for atrial fibrillation recurrence. Cardiology journal. 2013;20(6):639–47. pmid:24338542.
- 36. Sari C, Ertem AG, Sari S, Efe TH, Keles T, Durmaz T, et al. Impaired aortic function in patients with coeliac disease. Kardiologia polska. 2015;73(11):1108–13. pmid:25987403.
- 37. Lioudaki E, Ganotakis ES, Mikhailidis DP. Liver enzymes: potential cardiovascular risk markers? Current pharmaceutical design. 2011;17(33):3632–43. pmid:22074433.
- 38. Rief P, Pichler M, Raggam R, Hafner F, Gerger A, Eller P, et al. The AST/ALT (De-Ritis) ratio: A novel marker for critical limb ischemia in peripheral arterial occlusive disease patients. Medicine. 2016;95(24):e3843. pmid:27310963; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4998449.
- 39. Weng SF, Kai J, Guha IN, Qureshi N. The value of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase in cardiovascular disease risk assessment. Open heart. 2015;2(1):e000272. pmid:26322236; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4548065.
- 40. Yokoyama M, Watanabe T, Otaki Y, Takahashi H, Arimoto T, Shishido T, et al. Association of the Aspartate Aminotransferase to Alanine Aminotransferase Ratio with BNP Level and Cardiovascular Mortality in the General Population: The Yamagata Study 10-Year Follow-Up. Disease markers. 2016;2016:4857917. pmid:27872510; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5107869.
- 41. Zoppini G, Cacciatori V, Negri C, Stoico V, Lippi G, Targher G, et al. The aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio predicts all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Medicine. 2016;95(43):e4821. pmid:27787357; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5089086.