Capacity of rTth polymerase to detect RNA in the presence of various inhibitors

Dongyang Cai; Ole Behrmann; Frank Hufert; Gregory Dame; Gerald Urban

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190041

Abstract

The full potential of the real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as a rapid and accurate diagnostic method is limited by DNA polymerase inhibitors as well as reverse transcriptase inhibitors which are ubiquitous in clinical samples. rTth polymerase has proven to be more resistant to DNA polymerase inhibitors present in clinical samples for DNA detection and also exhibits reverse transcriptase activity in the presence of Mn²⁺ ions. However, the capacity of rTth polymerase, which acts as DNA polymerase and reverse transcriptase, to detect RNA in the presence of various inhibitors has not been investigated in detail. Herein, the inhibitors originating from various clinical samples such as blood, urine, feces, bodily fluids, tissues and reagents used during nucleic acid extraction were employed to evaluate the capacity of rTth polymerase to detect RNA. The results show that the inhibitors have different inhibitory effects on the real-time RT-PCR reactions by rTth polymerase, and the inhibitory effects are concentration dependent. Additionally, the capacity of rTth polymerase to detect RNA in the presence of various inhibitors is better or at least comparable with its capacity to detect DNA in the presence of various inhibitors. As a consequence, RNA may be directly detected in the presence of co-purified inhibitors or even directly from crude clinical samples by rTth polymerase.

Citation: Cai D, Behrmann O, Hufert F, Dame G, Urban G (2018) Capacity of rTth polymerase to detect RNA in the presence of various inhibitors. PLoS ONE 13(1): e0190041. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190041

Editor: Chandravanu Dash, Meharry Medical College, UNITED STATES

Received: July 9, 2017; Accepted: December 7, 2017; Published: January 2, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Cai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: This work was supported by the China Scholarship Council (201406360050), (http://www.csc.edu.cn) to DC. The design of the study and the preparation of the manuscript were supported by this funding. The work was also funded by the In-house funding of the Laboratory for Sensors-IMTEK, (https://www.imtek.de/laboratories/sensors) to DC. The data collection and analysis and publication charge were supported by this funding.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a useful and important technology in the clinical diagnostic laboratory, which has been widely used for the measurement of gene expression, detection of cancer, diagnosis of infectious agents or genetic diseases [1–4]. Theoretically, real-time RT-PCR differs from real-time PCR only by the addition of an initial step which converts RNA into complementary DNA by a reverse transcriptase. The co-purified inhibitors from clinical samples are highly inhibitory to real-time PCR and the DNA polymerase is the most likely target site of these inhibitors [5]. The reverse transcriptase used in the RT step is another target site of the inhibitors and its resistance may differ from the DNA polymerase, resulting in more assay variation [6–10].

A number of clinically relevant substances have been reported to be DNA polymerase inhibitors, namely, lactoferrin, hemoglobin, immunoglobulin G (IgG) and added anticoagulants in blood, myoglobin in muscle tissues, urea in urine, bile salts in feces, some metal ions in bodily fluids and tissues, and reagents used during nucleic acid extraction [11–16]. Additionally, some reverse transcriptases such as Moloney-murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase and Rous-associated virus 2 reverse transcriptase have been reported to be inhibited by some substances co-purified from clinical samples [6–10]. For example, when the HIV-1 RNA was detected by RT-PCR in the presence of co-purified heparin, only 26% samples showed positive results [8]. Heparin is extremely hard to remove because it can co-purify with the RNA throughout numerous isolation procedures, even those using column purification [17]. When applying the real-time RT-PCR technique to RNA extracted from clinical samples, it must be considered that the co-purified inhibitors may negatively affect the sensitivity of the assay or even cause false-negative results. Foreign RNAs are commonly used in real-time RT-PCR as internal controls to indicate the presence of inhibitors and normalize the variation caused by these substances [18, 19]. The detection of target and control sequences are inhibited to the same extent is the prerequisite of using such controls, however, which is not always the case [20]. When the presence of co-purified inhibitors is suspected, investigators tend to dilute or re-purify the RNA sample when the abundance of the target is not limiting. An easier and more reliable way is to use reverse transcriptase and DNA polymerase that are more resistant to inhibitors.

rTth polymerase, derived from the eubacterium Thermus thermophilus HB8, has proven to be more resistant to DNA polymerase inhibitors present in clinical samples for DNA detection and also exhibits reverse transcriptase activity in the presence of Mn²⁺ ions [21, 22]. The capacity of rTth polymerase to detect DNA in the presence of different concentrations of Na⁺ ions, Ca²⁺ ions, Fe³⁺ ions, EDTA, heparin, bile salts, IgG, lactoferrin, hemoglobin, and myoglobin has been reported [11–13, 21]. There is also evidence that RNA detection by rTth polymerase is more resistant to the inhibitors present in nasopharyngeal swab compared to Taq polymerase [23]. However, the full potential of rTth polymerase to detect RNA in the presence of other clinically relevant inhibitors has not been reported.

In this study, we investigated the capacity of rTth polymerase which acted as both reverse transcriptase and DNA polymerase to detect RNA in the presence of different concentrations of blood, tissue, feces and bodily fluids originating inhibitors as well as the reagents used during nucleic acid extraction. The results show that a) the inhibitors have different inhibitory effects on the real-time RT-PCR reactions by rTth polymerase, and the inhibitory effects are concentration dependent; b) the capacity of rTth polymerase to detect RNA in the presence of various inhibitors is better or at least comparable with its capacity to detect DNA in the presence of various inhibitors; c) certain RNA samples with co-purified inhibitors can be detected directly by rTth polymerase without the need for dilution or re-purification; d) RNA may be detected directly from certain clinical samples by rTth polymerase in the presence of RNase inhibitors.

Materials and methods

Bacterial culture and RNA extraction

Enterococcus faecalis Symbioflor 1 (E. faecalis Symbioflor 1) was cultured overnight in lysogeny broth Luria (LB-Luria). 1 ml bacterial culture was centrifuged at 8000×g for 5 min to pellet the bacteria. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was washed one time with distilled water. E. faecalis Symbioflor 1 total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). All extraction procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNase I (Ambion, Kaufungen, Germany) treatment was used to remove trace amounts of genomic DNA from the total RNA. The final concentration of the total RNA (19.6 ng/uL) was determined spectrophotometrically using a NanoPhotometer (Implen, Munchen, Germany).

PCR inhibitory samples

Different concentrations of NaCl (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany), CaCl₂·2H₂O (Sigma, Neu-Ulm, Germany), FeCl₃·6H₂O (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), disodium EDTA·2H₂O (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany), trisodium citrate·2H₂O (Sigma, Vienna, Austria), sodium heparin (Novo, Vienna, Austria), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), proteinase K (Ambion, Kaufungen, Germany), urea (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany), bile salts (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany), hemoglobin and lactoferrin from human blood (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany), bovine IgG (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany), and myoglobin from human heart (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany) were prepared in DEPC treated water to investigate their effects on rTth polymerase to detect RNA. The final concentrations in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures were 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 mM NaCl; 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 mM CaCl₂; 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10 mM FeCl₃; 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 mM EDTA; 1, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60 mM citrate; 1, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60 IU heparin; 10, 20, 50, 100, 150, 200 μg/ml SDS; 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80 μg/ml proteinase K; 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400 mM urea; 10, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000 μg/ml bile salts; 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200 μg/ml lactoferrin; 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 mg/mL hemoglobin; 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 300 μg/ml IgG; 30, 60, 90, 120, 300, 600 μg/ml myoglobin.

RT-PCR assay

The volume of the real-time RT-PCR mixture was 20 μL. The assay was performed with forward primer 5’-TGAATTGCGTTTCGTAGGTTAC-3’, reverse primer 5’-CCAAACATATTGCCACTTAAATCTC-3’ and Taqman probe 5’-TCGGGTCAGGGTCCTAATCGAAGTGG-3’ which were designed targeting the CNRZ16 gene of E. faecalis Symbioflor 1 using the Primer3plus online service. All of the real-time RT-PCR mixtures contained 1×RT-PCR buffer (50 mM bicine/KOH, 115 mM K-acetate, 8% v/v glycerol), 0.5 μM of each primer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 4 mM MnCl_2, 0.3 μM Taqman probe and 0.25 U/μL rTth polymerase (Bioron, Ludwigshafen, Germany). Varying amounts of inhibitory substances were added to the real-time RT-PCR mixtures to obtain the final concentrations. 1 μL E. faecalis Symbioflor 1 total RNA (19.6 ng/μL) was added to the real-time RT-PCR mixtures as the last ingredient. The RT step was performed at 61 ºC for 30 min, the following PCR step was performed at 94 ºC for 2 min, followed by 50 thermal cycles at 94 ºC for 15 s, 60 ºC for 45 s, and a final extension at 72 ºC for 2 min. The results were then presented by amplification curves and end-point fluorescence intensity ratios: (fluorescence intensity at cycle 40 in the presence of inhibitors / fluorescence intensity at cycle 40 in the absence of inhibitors) × 100. After 40 thermal cycles, the amplification curve of positive control reached the plateau phase, whereas the fluorescence intensity of the PCR reactions in the presence of certain inhibitors continued to slightly increase even at cycle 50. The additional amplification after 40 cycles in the presence of inhibitors can mask the decreased capacity of rTth polymerase for RNA detection. Therefore, the fluorescence intensity at cycle 40 was chosen to plot the fluorescence intensity ratios. All these experiments were repeated for three times.

Results

Inhibitory effects of metal ions on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase

Metal ions are present in a variety of clinical samples and their inhibitory effects on rTth polymerase to detect DNA have been well described [11, 21]. Different concentrations of Na⁺, Ca²⁺ and Fe³⁺ ions were added to the real-time RT-PCR mixtures to investigate their effects on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase. The addition of Na⁺ ions at a concentration of 10 mM in the real-time RT-PCR mixture increased the fluorescence intensity to approximately 110.3%, whereas the addition of Na⁺ ions at concentrations of 20 and 40 mM in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures reduced the fluorescence intensity to approximately 93.0% and 16.4%, respectively. The addition of Na⁺ ions at concentrations of 60, 80 and 100 mM in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures completely inhibited the RNA detection by rTth polymerase (Fig 1A and 1B). The addition of Ca²⁺ ions at concentrations of 6 and 8 mM in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures reduced the fluorescence intensity to approximately 67.7% and 55.9%, respectively. The addition of Ca²⁺ ions at concentrations of 10, 12, 14 and 16 mM in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures completely inhibited the RNA detection by rTth polymerase (Fig 1C and 1D). The addition of Fe³⁺ ions at concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 0.5 and 1 mM in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures reduced the fluorescence intensity to approximately 88.1%, 77.8%, 75.8% and 65.0%, respectively. The addition of Fe³⁺ ions at concentrations of 5 and 10 mM in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures completely inhibited the RNA detection by rTth polymerase (Fig 1E and 1F). It was found that the higher valence of ions were added, the more significant inhibition was observed. The inhibitory effects of trivalent ions were more significant than divalent ions and those of divalent ions were more significant than monovalent ions.

Download:

Fig 1.

Inhibitory effects of different concentrations of Na⁺ ions A, B), Ca²⁺ ions C, D), and Fe³⁺ ions E, F) on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190041.g001

Inhibitory effects of anticoagulants on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase

In the medical laboratory, EDTA, citrate and heparin are commonly used for the purpose of blood anticoagulation. Different concentrations of EDTA, citrate and heparin were added to the RT-PCR mixtures to investigate their effects on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase. The addition of EDTA at a concentration of 1 mM in the real-time RT-PCR mixture increased the fluorescence intensity to approximately 112.0%, whereas the addition of EDTA at concentrations of 2 and 4 mM in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures reduced the fluorescence intensity to approximately 97.2% and 17.8%, respectively. The addition of EDTA at concentrations of 6, 8 and 10 mM in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures completely inhibited the RNA detection by rTth polymerase (Fig 2A and 2B). The addition of citrate at concentrations of 1 and 5 mM in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures reduced the fluorescence intensity to approximately 81.5% and 14.8%, respectively. The addition of citrate at concentrations of 10, 20, 40 and 60 mM in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures completely inhibited the RNA detection by rTth polymerase (Fig 2C and 2D). The addition of heparin at a concentration of 1 IU in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures reduced the fluorescence intensity to approximately 65.7%. The addition of heparin at concentrations of 5, 10, 20, 40, 60 IU in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures completely inhibited the RNA detection by rTth polymerase (Fig 2E and 2F).

Download:

Fig 2.

Inhibitory effects of different concentrations of EDTA A, B), citrate C, D), and heparin E, F) on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190041.g002

Inhibitory effects of bile salts, urea, SDS, and proteinase K on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase

Bile salts and urea are well-known DNA polymerase inhibitors in feces and urine, respectively [14, 15]. Different concentrations of bile salts and urea were added to the real-time RT-PCR mixtures to investigate their effects on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase. The addition of bile salts at concentrations of 10, 50, 100 and 200 μg/ml in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures reduced the fluorescence intensity to approximately 84.9%, 83.5%, 70.4%, and 32.0%, respectively. The addition of bile salts at concentrations of 500 and 1000 μg/ml in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures completely inhibited the RNA detection by rTth polymerase (Fig 3A and 3B). The addition of urea at concentrations of 50, 100, 150, 200, 300 and 400 mM in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures reduced the fluorescence intensity to approximately 96.3%, 96.9%, 80.8%, 72.6%, 60.5% and 47.4%, respectively (Fig 3C and 3D).

Download:

Fig 3.

Inhibitory effects of different concentrations of bile salts A, B), urea C, D), SDS E, F), and proteinase K G, H) on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190041.g003

SDS and proteinase K are necessary for efficient cell lysis to prepare pure nucleic acids, but the residual reagents may also cause inhibitory effects [16]. Different concentrations of SDS and proteinase K were added to the real-time RT-PCR mixtures to investigate their effects on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase. The addition of SDS at concentrations of 10, 20 and 50 μg/ml in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures reduced the fluorescence intensity to approximately 96.8%, 87.0% and 67.0%, respectively. The addition of SDS at concentrations of 100, 150 and 200 μg/ml in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures completely inhibited the RNA detection by rTth polymerase (Fig 3E and 3F). The addition of proteinase K at concentrations of 5, 10, and 20 μg/ml in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures reduced the fluorescence intensity to approximately 33.3%, 20.5% and 10.5%, respectively. The addition of proteinase K at concentrations of 40, 60 and 80 μg/ml in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures completely inhibited the RNA detection by rTth polymerase (Fig 3G and 3H).

Inhibitory effects of proteins in clinical samples on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase

Lactoferrin in leukocytes, hemoglobin in erythrocytes, IgG in plasma and myoglobin in muscle tissues have been reported to be PCR inhibitors [11–13]. Different concentrations of lactoferrin, hemoglobin, IgG and myoglobin were added to the RT-PCR mixtures to investigate their effects on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase. The addition of lactoferrin at concentrations of 5, 10 and 20 μg/ml in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures reduced the fluorescence intensity to approximately 94.7%, 84.5% and 39.0%, respectively. The addition of lactoferrin at concentrations of 50, 100 and 200 μg/ml in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures completely inhibited the RNA detection by rTth polymerase (Fig 4A and 4B). The addition of hemoglobin at concentrations of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/ml in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures reduced the fluorescence intensity to approximately 81.7%, 70.2%, 52.5%, 36.2% and 10.2%, respectively. The addition of hemoglobin at a concentration of 5 mM completely inhibited the RNA detection by rTth polymerase (Fig 4C and 4D). The addition of IgG at concentrations of 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, and 300 μg/ml in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures reduced the fluorescence intensity to approximately 96.2%, 85.4%, 80.5%, 76.2%, 57.7%, and 48.4%, respectively (Fig 4E and 4F). The addition of myoglobin at concentrations of 30, 60, 90, 120, and 300 μg/ml in the real-time RT-PCR mixtures reduced the fluorescence intensity to approximately 89.9%, 71.4%, 69.9%, 66.1% and 35.8%, respectively. The addition of myoglobin at a concentration of 600 μg/ml in the real-time RT-PCR mixture completely inhibited the RNA detection by rTth polymerase (Fig 4G and 4H).

Download:

Fig 4.

Inhibitory effects of different concentrations of lactoferrin A, B), hemoglobin C, D), IgG E, F), and myoglobin G, H) on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190041.g004

Discussion

Metal ions in bodily fluids and tissues, anticoagulants in blood, reagents used during nucleic acids extraction, organic substances in urine and feces and proteins in blood and muscle tissues were used to evaluate the capacity of rTth polymerase to detect RNA. The study demonstrates that the inhibitors have different inhibitory effects on the real-time RT-PCR reactions by rTth polymerase, and these effects are concentration dependent. Additionally, the capacity of rTth polymerase to detect RNA in the presence of various inhibitors is better or at least comparable with its capacity to detect DNA in the presence of various inhibitors. As a consequence, RNA may be directly detected in the presence of co-purified inhibitors or even directly from crude clinical samples by rTth polymerase.

K⁺ ions in the PCR buffer are used to ensure suitable ion content. The addition of Na⁺ ions may disturb the ion content and therefore affect both polymerase activity and primer annealing conditions [24]. It has been reported that Na⁺ ions at a concentration of 150 mM were completely inhibitory to DNA detection by rTth polymerase [21]. Standard ion content needed by rTth polymerase for RNA detection may explain its higher resistance to Na⁺ ions for DNA detection. It has been reported that the addition of Ca²⁺ ions at a concentration of 2 mM in the PCR mixture was completely inhibitory to the DNA detection by rTth polymerase and the addition of Fe³⁺ ions at a concentration higher than 25 μM inhibited the DNA detection by rTth to less than 10% [11, 21]. It has also been reported that the addition of 0.25 mM EDTA and 0.01 IU heparin inhibited the DNA detection by rTth to about 46% and 51%, respectively [11]. Ca²⁺ ions, Fe³⁺ ions, EDTA, and citrate inhibit PCR by competing with or chelating Mg²⁺ ions which are necessary for rTth polymerase activity. The inhibitory effect of heparin has been reported on the basis of an interaction with DNA and DNA polymerase. Although both DNA and heparin are highly negatively charged, and would not be expected to interact, binding between these two molecules could be mediated by divalent cations such as Mg²⁺ ions [25]. Thus, a higher concentration of Mn²⁺ ions (4 mM) was used as a cofactor of rTth polymerase for RNA detection instead of Mg²⁺ ions, resulting in higher resistance to Ca²⁺ ions, Fe³⁺ ions, EDTA, citrate, and heparin. Additionally, Mn²⁺ ions have been reported to bind with DNA polymerase more tightly compared with Mg²⁺ ions, which is another possible explanation for the high resistance of rTth polymerase to detect RNA [26]. RNA samples with these co-purified inhibitors may thus be detected directly by rTth polymerase.

SDS, proteinase K and urea act as PCR inhibitors by degradation of DNA polymerases [5]. rTth polymerase was able to detect RNA in the presence of 100 mM urea without reduced detection capacity. The special protein structure of rTth polymerase is one possible explanation of its higher resistance to urea degradation. The urea excretion for an adult human is dependent on diet and age which is in the range between 340 and 580 mmol per day [5]. Therefore urine may be directly analyzed without any sample preparation procedures by rTth polymerase in the presence of RNase inhibitors. Bile salts are polar derivatives of cholesterol and contain both polar and non-polar regions [15]. The mechanism of bile salts as PCR inhibitors is still unknown. It has been reported that the addition of 0.25 to 0.1 mg/ml bile salts reduced the DNA detection by rTth polymerase to about 76%, which is very similar to our results for RNA detection [11].

Lactoferrin, hemoglobin and myoglobin have been reported to be the major PCR inhibitors in leukocytes, erythrocytes, and muscle tissues. The mechanism of PCR inhibition by these substances may be related to their abilities to release Fe³⁺ ions. The derivatives of hemoglobin (bilirubin, bile salts, and heme) and myoglobin (heme) were also found to be PCR inhibitors [11, 13]. Lactoferrin has been reported to interact with nucleic acids, which is another possible mechanism of PCR inhibition [12]. IgG in blood plasma forms a complex with ssDNA, therefore affects primer annealing and the concentration of free primers. It has been reported that rTth polymerase was able to detect DNA in the presence of 0.164 mg/mL IgG, which is very similar to our results for RNA detection [12]. It has also been reported that rTth polymerase enabled to detect DNA in the presence of 1 μg/mL lactoferrin and 4 mg/mL hemoglobin [11]. The higher resistance of lactoferrin in our study is probably because higher concentrations of Mn²⁺ ions and different experimental conditions were used. The lower resistance of hemoglobin in our study may be due to its fluorescence quenching capacity, which was further demonstrated by a conventional PCR reaction. In that reaction, rTth polymerase enabled RNA detection in the presence of at least 40 mg/mL hemoglobin (S1 Fig).

Significantly, the error rate of rTth polymerase is increased in the presence of Mn²⁺ ions [27]. When high fidelity is required in the RT-PCR products, a two step RT-PCR is recommended. The RT step is performed to reverse transcribe RNA by rTth polymerase in the presence of Mn²⁺ ions and the PCR step is performed in the same tube simply by chelation of Mn²⁺ ions and the addition of Mg²⁺ ions. Additionally, the inhibitory effects of inhibitors on reverse transcriptase or DNA polymerase can be determined using a two step RT-PCR.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. RNA detection in the presence of different concentrations of hemoglobin by rTth polymerase.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190041.s001

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Barbara Enderle for her assistance in this work.

References

1. Overbergh L, Giulietti A, Valckx D, Decallonne R, Bouillon R, Mathieu C. The use of real-time reverse transcriptase PCR for the quantification of cytokine gene expression. J Biomol Tech. 2003;14: 33–43. pmid:12901609
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Mitas M, Mikhitarian K, Walters C, Baron PL, Elliott BM, Brothers TE, et al. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR detection of breast cancer micrometastasis using a multigene marker panel. Int J Cancer. 2001;93: 162–71. pmid:11410861
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Kageyama T, Kojima S, Shinohara M, Uchida K, Fukushi S, Hoshino FB, et al. Broadly reactive and highly sensitive assay for norwalk-like viruses based on real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41: 1548–1557. pmid:12682144
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Torres RJ, Garcia MG, Puig JG. Carrier and prenatal diagnosis of Lesch-Nyhan disease due to a defect in HPRT gene expression regulation. Gene. 2012;511: 306–307. pmid:23046577
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Schrader C, Schielke A, Ellerbroek L, Johne R. PCR inhibitors-occurrence, properties and removal. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113: 1014–1026. pmid:22747964
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Izraeli S, Pfleiderer C, Lion T. Detection of gene expression by PCR amplification of RNA derived from frozen heparinized whole blood. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19: 6051. pmid:1719488
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Holodniy M, Kim S, Katzenstein D, Konrad M, Groves E, Merigan TC. Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus gene amplification by heparin. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29: 676–679. pmid:1909709
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Imai H, Yamada O, Morita S, Suehiro S, Kurimura T. Detection of HIV-1 RNA in heparinized plasma of HIV-1 seropositive individuals. J Virol Methods. 1992;36: 181–184. pmid:1372911
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Johnson ml, Navanukraw C, Grazul-Bilska AT, Reynolds LP, Redmer DA. Heparinase treatment of RNA before quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Biotechniques. 2003;35: 1140–1144. pmid:14682046
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Hyun C, Filippich LJ, Hughes I. The inhibitory effect of pentobarbitone on reverse transcription-PCR. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2005;62: 63–68. pmid:15656944
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Abu al-Soud W, Radstrom P. Purification and characterization of PCR-inhibitory components in blood cells. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39: 485–493. pmid:11158094
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Abu Al-Soud W, Jonsson LJ, Radstrom P. Identification and characterization of immunoglobulin G in blood as a major inhibitor of diagnostic PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38: 345–350. pmid:10618113
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Belec L, Authier J, Eliezer-Vanerot MC, Piedouillet C, Mohamed AS, Gherardi RK. Myoglobin as a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) inhibitor: A limitation for PCR from skeletal muscle tissue avoided by the use of thermus thermophilus polymerase. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21: 1064–1067. pmid:9655125
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Khan G, Kangro HO, Coates PJ, Heath RB. Inhibitory effects of urine on the polymerase chain-reaction for cytomegalovirus DNA. J Clin Pathol. 1991;44: 360–365. pmid:1646235
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Lantz PG, Matsson M, Wadstrom T, Radstrom P. Removal of PCR inhibitors from human faecal samples through the use of an aqueous two-phase system for sample preparation prior to PCR. J Microbiol Methods. 1997;28: 159–167.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Rossen L, Norskov P, Holmstrom K, Rasmussen OF. Inhibition of PCR by components of food samples, microbial diagnostic assays and DNA-extraction solutions. Int J Food Microbiol. 1992;17: 37–45. pmid:1476866
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Jung R, Lübcke C, Wagener C, Neumaier M. Reversal of RT-PCR inhibition observed in heparinized clinical specimens. Biotechniques. 1997;23: 24–28. pmid:9232220
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Nolan T, Hands RE, Ogunkolade W, Bustin SA. SPUD: A quantitative PCR assay for the detection of inhibitors in nucleic acid preparations. Anal Biochem. 2006;351: 308–310. pmid:16524557
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Smith RD, Brown B, Ikonomi P, Schechter AN. Exogenous reference RNA for normalization of real-time quantitative PCR. Biotechniques. 2003;34: 88–91. pmid:12545545
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Huggett JF, Novak T, Garson JA, Green C, Morris-Jones SD, Miller RF, et al. Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognised phenomenon. BMC Res Notes. 2008;1: 70. pmid:18755023
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Abu al-Soud W, Radstrom P. Capacity of nine thermostable DNA polymerases to mediate DNA amplification in the presence of PCR-Inhibiting samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64: 3748–3753. pmid:9758794
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Myers TW, Gelfand DH. Reverse transcription and DNA amplification by a thermus-thermophilus DNA-polymerase. Biochemistry. 1991;30: 7661–7666. pmid:1714296
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Das A, Spackman E, Pantin-Jackwood M J, Suarez D L. Removal of real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) inhibitors associated with cloacal swab samples and tissues for improved diagnosis of Avian influenza virus by RT-PCR. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2009;21: 771–778. pmid:19901277
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Hedman J, Knutsson R, Ansell R, Radstrom P, Rasmusson B. Pre-PCR processing in bioterrorism preparedness: improved diagnostic capabilities for laboratory response networks. Biosecur Bioterror. 2013;11: S87–S101. pmid:23971826
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Satsangi J, Jewell D, Welsh K, Bunce M, Bell J. Effect of heparin on polymerase chain-reaction. Lancet. 1994;343: 1509–1510.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Slater JP, Tamir I, Loeb LA, Mildvan AS. The mechanism of Escherichia coli deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase I. J Biol Chem. 1972;247: 6784–6794. pmid:4343158
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Mulder J, Mckinney N, Christopherson C, Sninsky J, Greenfield L, Kwok S. Rapid and simple PCR assay for quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma: application to acute retroviral infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32: 292–300. pmid:8150937
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Overbergh L, Giulietti A, Valckx D, Decallonne R, Bouillon R, Mathieu C. The use of real-time reverse transcriptase PCR for the quantification of cytokine gene expression. J Biomol Tech. 2003;14: 33–43. pmid:12901609
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Mitas M, Mikhitarian K, Walters C, Baron PL, Elliott BM, Brothers TE, et al. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR detection of breast cancer micrometastasis using a multigene marker panel. Int J Cancer. 2001;93: 162–71. pmid:11410861
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Kageyama T, Kojima S, Shinohara M, Uchida K, Fukushi S, Hoshino FB, et al. Broadly reactive and highly sensitive assay for norwalk-like viruses based on real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41: 1548–1557. pmid:12682144
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Torres RJ, Garcia MG, Puig JG. Carrier and prenatal diagnosis of Lesch-Nyhan disease due to a defect in HPRT gene expression regulation. Gene. 2012;511: 306–307. pmid:23046577
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Schrader C, Schielke A, Ellerbroek L, Johne R. PCR inhibitors-occurrence, properties and removal. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113: 1014–1026. pmid:22747964
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Izraeli S, Pfleiderer C, Lion T. Detection of gene expression by PCR amplification of RNA derived from frozen heparinized whole blood. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19: 6051. pmid:1719488
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Holodniy M, Kim S, Katzenstein D, Konrad M, Groves E, Merigan TC. Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus gene amplification by heparin. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29: 676–679. pmid:1909709
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Imai H, Yamada O, Morita S, Suehiro S, Kurimura T. Detection of HIV-1 RNA in heparinized plasma of HIV-1 seropositive individuals. J Virol Methods. 1992;36: 181–184. pmid:1372911
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Johnson ml, Navanukraw C, Grazul-Bilska AT, Reynolds LP, Redmer DA. Heparinase treatment of RNA before quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Biotechniques. 2003;35: 1140–1144. pmid:14682046
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Hyun C, Filippich LJ, Hughes I. The inhibitory effect of pentobarbitone on reverse transcription-PCR. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2005;62: 63–68. pmid:15656944
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Abu al-Soud W, Radstrom P. Purification and characterization of PCR-inhibitory components in blood cells. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39: 485–493. pmid:11158094
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Abu Al-Soud W, Jonsson LJ, Radstrom P. Identification and characterization of immunoglobulin G in blood as a major inhibitor of diagnostic PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38: 345–350. pmid:10618113
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Belec L, Authier J, Eliezer-Vanerot MC, Piedouillet C, Mohamed AS, Gherardi RK. Myoglobin as a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) inhibitor: A limitation for PCR from skeletal muscle tissue avoided by the use of thermus thermophilus polymerase. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21: 1064–1067. pmid:9655125
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Khan G, Kangro HO, Coates PJ, Heath RB. Inhibitory effects of urine on the polymerase chain-reaction for cytomegalovirus DNA. J Clin Pathol. 1991;44: 360–365. pmid:1646235
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Lantz PG, Matsson M, Wadstrom T, Radstrom P. Removal of PCR inhibitors from human faecal samples through the use of an aqueous two-phase system for sample preparation prior to PCR. J Microbiol Methods. 1997;28: 159–167.
View Article
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Rossen L, Norskov P, Holmstrom K, Rasmussen OF. Inhibition of PCR by components of food samples, microbial diagnostic assays and DNA-extraction solutions. Int J Food Microbiol. 1992;17: 37–45. pmid:1476866
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] PubMed/NCBI

[63] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Jung R, Lübcke C, Wagener C, Neumaier M. Reversal of RT-PCR inhibition observed in heparinized clinical specimens. Biotechniques. 1997;23: 24–28. pmid:9232220
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Nolan T, Hands RE, Ogunkolade W, Bustin SA. SPUD: A quantitative PCR assay for the detection of inhibitors in nucleic acid preparations. Anal Biochem. 2006;351: 308–310. pmid:16524557
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Smith RD, Brown B, Ikonomi P, Schechter AN. Exogenous reference RNA for normalization of real-time quantitative PCR. Biotechniques. 2003;34: 88–91. pmid:12545545
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Huggett JF, Novak T, Garson JA, Green C, Morris-Jones SD, Miller RF, et al. Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognised phenomenon. BMC Res Notes. 2008;1: 70. pmid:18755023
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Abu al-Soud W, Radstrom P. Capacity of nine thermostable DNA polymerases to mediate DNA amplification in the presence of PCR-Inhibiting samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64: 3748–3753. pmid:9758794
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Myers TW, Gelfand DH. Reverse transcription and DNA amplification by a thermus-thermophilus DNA-polymerase. Biochemistry. 1991;30: 7661–7666. pmid:1714296
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Das A, Spackman E, Pantin-Jackwood M J, Suarez D L. Removal of real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) inhibitors associated with cloacal swab samples and tissues for improved diagnosis of Avian influenza virus by RT-PCR. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2009;21: 771–778. pmid:19901277
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Hedman J, Knutsson R, Ansell R, Radstrom P, Rasmusson B. Pre-PCR processing in bioterrorism preparedness: improved diagnostic capabilities for laboratory response networks. Biosecur Bioterror. 2013;11: S87–S101. pmid:23971826
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Satsangi J, Jewell D, Welsh K, Bunce M, Bell J. Effect of heparin on polymerase chain-reaction. Lancet. 1994;343: 1509–1510.
View Article
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Slater JP, Tamir I, Loeb LA, Mildvan AS. The mechanism of Escherichia coli deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase I. J Biol Chem. 1972;247: 6784–6794. pmid:4343158
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Mulder J, Mckinney N, Christopherson C, Sninsky J, Greenfield L, Kwok S. Rapid and simple PCR assay for quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma: application to acute retroviral infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32: 292–300. pmid:8150937
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Bacterial culture and RNA extraction

PCR inhibitory samples

RT-PCR assay

Results

Inhibitory effects of metal ions on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase

Inhibitory effects of anticoagulants on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase

Inhibitory effects of bile salts, urea, SDS, and proteinase K on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase

Inhibitory effects of proteins in clinical samples on the RNA detection by rTth polymerase

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. RNA detection in the presence of different concentrations of hemoglobin by rTth polymerase.

Acknowledgments

References