Predicting Impacts of Future Climate Change on the Distribution of the Widespread Conifer Platycladus orientalis

Xian-Ge Hu; Yuqing Jin; Xiao-Ru Wang; Jian-Feng Mao; Yue Li

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132326

Abstract

Chinese thuja (Platycladus orientalis) has a wide but fragmented distribution in China. It is an important conifer tree in reforestation and plays important roles in ecological restoration in the arid mountains of northern China. Based on high-resolution environmental data for current and future scenarios, we modeled the present and future suitable habitat for P. orientalis, evaluated the importance of environmental factors in shaping the species´ distribution, and identified regions of high risk under climate change scenarios. The niche models showed that P. orientalis has suitable habitat of ca. 4.2×10⁶ km² across most of eastern China and identified annual temperature, monthly minimum and maximum ultraviolet-B radiation and wet-day frequency as the critical factors shaping habitat availability for P. orientalis. Under the low concentration greenhouse gas emissions scenario, the range of the species may increase as global warming intensifies; however, under the higher concentrations of emissions scenario, we predicted a slight expansion followed by contraction in distribution. Overall, the range shift to higher latitudes and elevations would become gradually more significant. The information gained from this study should be an useful reference for implementing long-term conservation and management strategies for the species.

Citation: Hu X-G, Jin Y, Wang X-R, Mao J-F, Li Y (2015) Predicting Impacts of Future Climate Change on the Distribution of the Widespread Conifer Platycladus orientalis. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0132326. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132326

Editor: Tongming Yin, Nanjing Forestry University, CHINA

Received: April 20, 2015; Accepted: June 14, 2015; Published: July 1, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This study was funded by “The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (NO. YX2013-41)”.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [1] predicts that global climate warming will continue and the average temperature on the planet will have increased by 0.3–4.5°C through the end of the 21st century (relative to the 1986–2005 baseline). Current changes have already markedly affected the temporal and spatial properties of climate in China: (1) the spatial and temporal distributions of the heat resource have become very uneven, (2) the cold regions of the north have experienced rapid increases in temperature, and (3) the spatial unevenness of precipitation is increasing [2]. Changes in the spatiotemporal pattern of climate will have strong impacts on soil properties, plant phenology, plant diseases, insect pests, and the properties of forest ecosystems [1].

Climate shifts alter species’ geographic distributions, which in turn affect the patterns of climate change since surface vegetation has a major controlling effect on atmospheric properties. Consequently, a capacity for predicting the distribution patterns of species under future climate conditions will contribute substantially to the academic disciplines of biogeography and global change biology. Predicting the future impact of climate change on the areal extent of landscape containing appropriate habitat for particular species [3–5] will alert managers to the potential threats of climate change on species distribution ranges and effectively guide the establishment of biological strategies for resource development and utilization, including germplasm preparation and storage. Predictions on critical habitat availability will also contribute to better understanding ecological system stability and the distribution patterns of genetic variation within species [6].

Species distribution modeling (SDM) is widely used in ecology, biogeography, and evolutionary studies [7]. In recent years, SDM using Maxent method has contributed significantly to the prediction of biodiversity loss under future climate scenarios [8] and to the rational use of environmental resources [9] threatened by upcoming climate changes. Importantly, Maxent is able to function with presence-only data, such as those of species’ distribution records. It requires only geo-referenced occurrence data to predict the distribution of suitable habitat for a species through determinations of the probability distribution of maximum entropy [10] coupled with environmental information for the whole study area.

Platycladus orientalis (L.) Franco, a member of the family Cupressaceae, is a widespread conifer in China [11]. This species is able to endure drought and persist on barren soil, and consequently, it is commonly used for ecological restoration projects in arid mountain landscapes of northern China, where the species is used in protection forests for sand stabilization and soil erosion control. The species has unique abilities in the absorption and accumulation of atmospheric pollutants (SO₂, Cl₂) and heavy metal pollutants in soil (Cu, Zn, among others) [12]. Its wood is strong and decay-resistant, making it valuable in building, furniture, and ship construction [13]. Until now, little is known about the properties of the habitat distribution for this tree, and the important eco-environmental factors shaping the suitability. Whether changing climate will impact the areal extent of suitable habitat for P. orientalis is a crucial issue given the ecological and economic significance of the species, and enhancing the powers of prediction would contribute to management planning.

Based on an extensive collection of geo-referenced occurrence records for P. orientalis and large-scale, high-precision meteorological environmental data, this study aims (1) to identify the main impact factors for habitat suitability shift of P. orientalis, (2) to examine the properties and trends of shifts in the areal extent of suitable habitat under a variety of current and future climate scenarios, and (3) to project and quantify the spatial pattern of shifts in the areal extent of suitable habitat under future climate conditions, thereby providing a theoretical reference framework for global change biology, as well as for the plantation, management, and utilization of P. orientalis.

Materials and Methods

The occurrence and distribution of P. orientalis

To obtain general information relating to the occurrence of P. orientalis across its whole range, we first accessed distributions reported in the literature [14–16] and the China Virtual Herbarium (CVH, http://v5.cvh.org.cn/) database, which holds plant distribution records from all main herbaria across the country. In total, we collected 691 unrepeatable geo-referenced occurrence records (604 occurrence points from the CVH and 87 occurrence points from literatures, shown in Supporting Information S1 Dataset). When occurrence records lacked exact geo-coordinates, we used Google Earth (http://ditu.google.cn/) to determine the latitude and longitude.

Current environmental parameters

The distribution area of P. orientalis is affected by meteorological factors, such as temperature, moisture, light, soil conditions and landscape properties. On the basis of earlier screenings of related variables [17], we selected eight meteorological and 10 environmental parameters that are closely related to plant growth (Table 1).

Download:

Table 1. Environmental parameters used to predict the potential geographic distribution of Platycladus orientalis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132326.t001

The eight bioclimatic layers (Bio1, Bio2, Bio3, Bio4, Bio5, Bio12, Bio14, Bio15) included in our modeling exercise were obtained from Worldclim (http://www.worldclim.org/) [18]. Climate and environmental data were obtained as follows: soil organic carbon (SC), soil pH (SpH), and growing degree days (GDD) from the Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (http://www.sage.wisc.edu/atlas/index.php); ground-frost frequency (FRS), wet-day frequency (WET), and vapor pressure (VAP) from the IPCC database (http://www.ipcc-data.org/obs/cru_ts2_1.html); and global UV-B radiation (UVB1, UVB2, UVB3, UVB4) from the gIUV database (http://www.ufz.de/gluv/) [19]. These data were preprocessed to a general spatial resolution of 30′′ latitude/longitude (ca. 1 km² at ground level).

Future climate scenarios and data

To support the IPCC, the international climate research community has participated in a comparison project titled the “Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5)” [1]. Within this framework, coordinated experiments using climate and earth system models have been organized to research and answer questions on the mechanisms and properties of climate change. The Fifth IPCC Assessment Report (AR5) was published on September 30, 2013 [1]. It defined a new set of scenarios to take account of the rising complexity of model calculations and to analyze the effects of different political measures. The Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) represent the full bandwidth of possible future emission trajectories. Four RCPs (i.e., RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5) were coded according to a possible range of radiative forcing values in the year 2100 relative to preindustrial values (+2.6, +4.5, +6.0, and +8.5 W•m^-2, respectively) [20]. The extreme weather variations will pose greater influence to geographical distribution pattern and its temporal and spatial variation of plant. So we selected climate variables for simulation in four climate change scenario/year combinations: RCP2.6–2050 (average for the years 2041–2060 under scenario RCP2.6), RCP2.6–2070 (average for the years 2061–2080 under the scenario RCP2.6), RCP8.5–2050 (average for the years 2061–2080 under the scenario RCP8.5), and RCP8.5–2070 (average for the years 2061–2080 under the scenario RCP8.5), these data all with better representation. The CMIP5-derived future climate scenario data that we used were coded (as BCC-CSM1-1) and generated by the Beijing Climate Center (http://cmdp.ncc.cma.gov.cn/en/). Our four selected future climate data sets were downloaded from the World Climate Database (http://www.worldclim.org/) [18]. Currently only meteorological data (we selected 8 in our study) under future scenario are available for related studies. The 10 environmental parameters (SC, SpH, GDD, FRS, WET, VAP and 4 UV-B radiation parameters) were remained unchanged for the following analyses of SDM projection under future climate conditions.

Current and future potential habitat predictions

Using data for the 18 environmental parameters and the occurrence of P. orientalis, we performed SDM for current climate conditions using the maximum entropy approach in Maxent v3.3.3 software operating with default settings [10]. Model predictions were then checked against real observations using the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plot [21]. A ROC curve shows the performance of a model whose output depends on a threshold parameter, it tests whether a model classifies species presence more accurately than random predictions. A perfect model has an AUC of 1, but performance is good when the AUC is > 0.9 [22]. Conversion of the continuous suitability index maps to binary habitat and non-habitat charts required a probability threshold to determine potential changes in future habitat of P. orientalis. To define habitat and non-habitat for P. orientalis, we used the “maximum training sensitivity plus specificity” threshold which has been shown to produce highly accurate predictions [23].

Using Maxent-generated response curves, we obtained relationships between habitat suitability for P. orientalis and environmental variables. Based on predictor contributions in the Maxent model, we were able to identify the main impact factors for habitat suitability in P. orientalis.

After modeling the current suitable habitat area for P. orientalis with current climate data, we performed modeling projections for future climate scenarios (RCP2.6–2050, RCP2.6–2070, RCP8.5–2050, and RCP8.5–2070) to predict the future suitable habitat area for the species. The SDM projections were calculated with Maxent software. We cross-checked future suitable habitat areas against the current distribution area of P. orientalis to identify regions that had become (i) unsuitable, (ii) suitable, and (iii) remained unchanged with respect to suitability; we then calculated and illustrated the areas of regions identified in (i)-(iii).

The core distributional shifts

To further examine the trend of suitable area changes, we also calculated and compared the centroids of future and current suitable areas by using a python-based GIS toolkit, SDMtoolbox [24]. The SDMtoolbox calculates the distributional changes between two binary SDMs (e.g. current and future SDMs) [24], and this analysis is focused on summarizing the core distributional shifts of the ranges of P. orientalis. This analyses reduces species' distribution to a single central point (known as a centroid) and creates a vector file depicting magnitude and direction of predicted change through time. We examined the distributional shifts by tracking the changes in centroid changes among different SDMs.

Results

The species distribution model and its accuracy

Based on known occurrences of P. orientalis and current climate data, we generated geographic distribution maps predicting areas where P. orientalis might occur. The model performance for P. orientalis was better than random (AUC = 0.952); thus, the model performed well in predicting the suitable habitat area for the species. Our “maximum training sensitivity plus specificity” threshold value of 0.257 was obtained from the 10th percentile training presence occurrences of the species. The suitable habitat areas for P. orientalis were divided by these calculations into three categories: (i) 0.257–0.400, which included low habitat suitability areas that we color-coded green; (ii) 0.400–0.600, which included areas of moderate habitat suitability that we color-coded yellow; and (iii) 0.600–1.000, which included highly habitat suitable areas that we color-coded red. We constructed geographic distribution maps predicting areas where P. orientalis might occur (Fig 1A). Currently suitable habitat areas for P. orientalis were predicted to occur in the southern part of Inner Mongolia, Jilin, Liaoning, eastern Gansu, eastern Sichuan, north–central Yunnan, northern Guangdong, and Guangxi. The predicted areas of suitable habitat for P. orientalis were continuous and spanned the region from northern to southern sectors of China. The current areas suitable for P. orientalis were predicted to encompass ca. 4.2×10⁶ km².

Download:

Fig 1. Current species distribution model and the core distributional shifts under different climate scenario/year for Platycladus orientalis.

A, The occurrence and current species distribution model (SDM) for Platycladus orientalis. B, the core distributional shifts under different climate scenario/year combination. Black dot indicates the geometric center of suitable area under current climate condition; orange dot and red dot indicate the geometric centers of future suitable areas of 2050 and 2070 under the climate scenario of RCP2.6; wathet dot and blue dots indicate the geometric centers of future suitable areas of 2050 and 2070 under the climate scenario of RCP8.5, and the arrows depicting magnitude and direction of predicted change through time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132326.g001

Important environmental variables

Among the 18 environmental variables annual mean temperature (Bio1), mean UV-B in the dullest month (UVB4), wet-day frequency (WET), and mean UV-B in the brightest month (UVB3) made the greatest contributions to the distribution model for P. orientalis relative to other variables. Annual mean temperature made the largest contribution (28.9%); the contributions of mean UV-B in the dullest month, wet-day frequency, and mean UV-B in the brightest month were 21.4%, 12.8%, and 10%, respectively. The cumulative contributions of these factors reached values as high as 73.1%. Thus, these four parameters were the major environmental variables we used for constructing the predicted distribution area of P. orientalis. Using the response curve (Fig 2), we obtained the thresholds (existence probability > 0.257) for the main bioclimatic parameters: mean annual temperature (Bio1) ranged from 7.5 to 25°C, mean UV-B in the dullest month (UVB4) ranged from 600 to 1490 J•m^-2•day^-1, wet-day frequency (WET) ranged from 1% to 10%, and mean UV-B in the brightest month (UVB3) ranged from 4200 to 5800 J•m^-2•day^-1.

Download:

Fig 2. Response curves for important environmental predictors in the species distribution model for Platycladus orientalis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132326.g002

Future changes in suitable habitat area

Maxent predicted gains in suitable habitat area for the future climate scenario/year combination RCP2.6–2050 in the southern sector of Inner Mongolia and Liaoning, northern Hebei, central of Yunnan, and Guizhou (Fig 3A and 3B). The predicted area gain amounted to 0.35×10⁶ km², which was 8.35% of the currently suitable habitat area. Expansions in area increased with increasing latitude and elevation (Table 2). The losses of suitable habitat area of ca. 0.26×10⁶ km² (6.21% of the currently suitable habitat area), were predicted for the southern sectors of Guangdong Province and the Guangxi Autonomous Region, and the western part of Chongqing. The areas with a high risk of habitat loss were mostly concentrated at low latitudes. Of the current area with suitable habitat, 93.79% remained unchanged (ca. 3.96×10⁶ km²) for the future climate scenario/year combination RCP2.6–2050. The total suitable habitat area for P. orientalis increased by ca. 0.096×10⁶ km² (2.15% of the total). Overall, we saw a restricted range expansion of suitable habitat area under climate scenario (RCP2.6) (Fig 3A and 3B, Table 2).

Download:

Fig 3. Future species distribution models (SDMs) and their spatial shifts for Platycladus orientalis under climate change scenarios RCP2.6 and RCP8.5.

A, SDM for P. orientalis under future climate scenario RCP2.6 in the year 2050. B, SDM for P. orientalis under future climate scenario RCP2.6 in 2070. C, SDM for P. orientalis under future climate scenario RCP8.5 in 2050. D, SDM for P. orientalis under future climate scenario RCP8.5 in 2070. E, Comparison between the current SDM and the SDM under future climate scenario RCP2.6 in the year 2050. F, Comparison between the current SDM and the SDM under future climate scenario RCP2.6 in 2070. G, Comparison between the current SDM and the SDM under future climate scenario RCP8.5 in 2050. H, Comparison between the current SDM and the SDM under future climate scenario RCP8.5 in 2070.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132326.g003

Download:

Table 2. Dynamics of changes in suitable habitat area for Platycladus orientalis under four combinations of future climate scenario/year.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132326.t002

Under the future climate scenario of RCP2.6–2070, Maxent predicted gains in suitable habitat area in the southern sectors of Inner Mongolia, Liaoning, the northern sector of Hebei, and the central and southern sectors of Guangxi and Guizhou (Fig 3C and 3D, Table 2). The areal extent of gains amounted to 0.34×10⁶ km² (8.03% of the currently suitable habitat area). Expansions toward higher latitude and elevations were more marked than for the RCP2.6–2050 climate scenario/year combination. Losses of suitable habitat area were mostly concentrated in the central and southern sectors of Guangdong and Guangxi, western Chongqing, northeastern Guangxi, northeastern and central Fujian, and southern Zhejiang; losses amounted to ca. 0.29×10⁶ km² (6.77%) and were mostly concentrated in low latitudes. In addition to overall losses, the predicted suitable habitat area became fragmented and discontinuous in southern China, while suitable habitat expansions were predicted toward northern areas. Areas remaining unchanged in the projection amounted to ca. 3.93×10⁶ km² (93.23%). The total suitable habitat area expanded by ca. 0.05×10⁶ km² (1.26%), but the gains were smaller than the projection for future climate scenario/year combination RCP2.6–2050 (Fig 3A and 3B, Table 2).

Maxent predicted gains in suitable habitat area in very limited regions of northern Shanxi and the central sector of Guangxi under the future climate scenario/year combination RCP8.5–2050 (Fig 3E and 3F). These gains of ca. 0.52×10⁶ km² (11.26% of the current suitable habitat area) were located at high latitudes. The shifts in suitable area got more and more toward higher latitudes and elevations and also expansion to the Yunnan-Guizhou plateau. Losses of suitable habitat area were located mainly in the central and southern sectors of Guangxi and Guangdong, eastern Sichuan, western Chongqing, eastern Hebei, and sectors of Hunan, Jiangxi, and Fujian, and amounted to 0.48×10⁶ km² (11.39%). There were 88.61% of the currently suitable habitat area remained unchanged (ca. 3.75×10⁶ km²). The total suitable area was expanded by ca. 0.036×10⁶ km² (0.87%).

Under RCP8.5–2070, Maxent predicted gains in suitable habitat area in the southern sectors of Inner Mongolia and Liaoning, northern sectors of Shanxi and Hebei, and central and southern sectors of Guangxi and Guizhou, amounting to ca. 0.68×10⁶ km² (16.08% of the currently suitable habitat area). The gains toward higher latitudes and elevations, and the expansion to the Yunnan-Guizhou plateau, were very obvious. The losses of suitable habitat area were located mainly in the central and southern sectors of Guangxi and Guangdong, eastern Sichuan, western Chongqing, eastern Hebei, and sections of Hunan, Jiangxi, and Fujian, and amounted to 0.82×10⁶ km² (19.43%). Most of the losses were located at low latitudes. A trend of fragmentation and northerly migration was also apparent. Approximately 3.40×10⁶ km² of suitable habitat area (80.57%) remained unchanged. The total suitable habitat area was reduced by ca. 0.14×10⁶ km² (3.36%), suggesting that under the future climate scenario/year combination RCP8.5–2070, high concentrations of greenhouse gases would substantially degrade habitat for P. orientalis (Fig 3G and 3H, Table 2).

The core distributional shifts

The centroid of the current habitat was located at the position of 112.75E in longitude and 32.52N in latitude in south of Henan province (Fig 1B). The centroid of future suitable area shifted to the position (112.12E, 33.26N) in the northwest under RCP2.6–2050, to the position (112.33E, 33.46N) under RCP2.6–2070. Under RCP8.5–2050, the centroid of future suitable area was located at a more northwest position (111.51E, 33.83N), and even more northwest at the position (110.64E, 34.18N) under RCP8.5–2070. Overall, we saw the core distributional shift expressed a northwest tendency under both future emission trajectories (RCP2.6, RCP8.5), and a relatively weak strength was found under the emission trajectory of lower representative concentration, RCP2.6 (Fig 1B).

Discussion

Climate modeling of tree species distributions has demonstrated that future global climate change will have significant impacts on forest ecosystems [25–26]. Discrepancies do occur between different climate modeling systems [27], but the approach nevertheless functions as an important research tool for assessing and predicting future changes in species distribution [28]. Despite the great strides in climate research made in recent years, most studies on plant species in China provide only approximate locations of change in habitat and rough descriptions of broad trends [29–31]. In the present study, we performed a more detailed study on the suitable habitat of P. orientalis that will function as an important first step in developing strategies and policies for management and utilization of this important forest tree.

P. orientalis has a wide but fragmented distribution in China. It ranges across the southern sector of Inner Mongolia, Jilin and Liaoning, northern Shanxi, Gansu, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan, Guangdong, and northern Guangxi [32]. It also occurs in Japan and North Korea. Based on large-scale environmental data, our modeling study projected a distribution of ca. 4.2×10⁶ km² for the species under current climate conditions, in which the center areas are in mid-western Henan, the central and southern sectors of Shanxi and Shaanxi, eastern Gansu, northern Hubei, southwestern Jiangsu, central Shandong, southeastern Anhui, central Guangdong, and northern Yunnan. This model is in agreement with a previous study that located the most suitable areas of the species in typical sub-arid regions in western Henan, Shanxi, Shaanxi, and Gansu [33], but the potential range we identified was broader.

In our modeling exercise, temperature and wetness are among the most important factors affecting the distribution of P. orientalis. Previous studies have shown that seeds germination rate of P. orientalis decreases rapidly with decreasing of matric water potential [34]. Water availability is correlated with many environmental factors that influence the physiological and biochemical processes of plants, e.g. soil moisture is shown to be the main factor affecting the plant assimilation rate [35]. The number of branches and female flowers of P. orientalis are significantly associated with the average annual rainfall [36] while the male flower development are closely related to both temperature and precipitation [37]. On the other hand, the seedling emergence rate and death rate of P. orientalis are directly affected by temperature [36]. All these hydrothermal factors may have played main roles in shaping the ecological adaptation of P. orientalis, and have great impacts on the distribution of this conifer tree.

The intensity of UV radiation may also have a major role in shaping the distribution range of P. orientalis. UV-B reaching the ground has a great impact on the subaerial organs of plants [38]. It affects plant morphology by inhibiting stem elongation and leaf area expansion in many species subjected to elevated UV-B [39]. UV-B radiation decreases photosynthetic activities [40] and influences the functioning of plant protective mechanisms [41]. This form of radiation interacts with other environmental factors, such as water stress, increased CO₂ concentration, and the availability of nutrients [42]. Levels of these factors modulate the effects of UV-B, which in turn may affect plant responses to other environmental parameters [43–45]. Previous studies have shown that the light saturation point, net photosynthesis, photorespiration of P. orientalis are closely related to the component of light source [34]. However, little is currently known about the specific effects of UV-B radiation on the changes in the physiology biochemistry of P. orientalis, and we recommend quantitative studies in the future.

Mountain forest ecosystems in the Northern Hemisphere forest are likely to shift to higher elevations as the atmosphere warms [46–48]. Consistently, our present study predicted upward shifts (Figs 1B and 3). It was predicted that under the low concentration greenhouse gas emissions scenario (RCP2.6), suitable habitat range will increase as global warming intensity proceeds. Under the higher concentrations of the high greenhouse gas emissions scenario (RCP8.5), we predicted a slight expansion in the next 40 years around 2050 followed by the slight contraction in the next 70 years around 2070. Overall, our prediction showed that the shift in distribution of suitable habitat areas to high latitudes and elevations would become gradually more significant, while low-latitude regions, such as Guangdong and Guangxi, would see a significant decrease in distribution. Our study emphasizes that forest surveillance should be planed for marginal populations both in low and high latitudes, so as to give a reasonable management advice in context of future climate change.

Although species are generally migrating to higher latitudes and elevations as climates warm [46, 49], the trends may differ between widely distributed species and those that have narrow ranges of occurrence. Plants with small distribution usually have a constrained ecological adaptability and are more susceptible to the impact of climate change. As an example, the suitable habitat area of the herb, Sinopodophyllum hexandrum, was predicted to fluctuate widely under future climate changes [29]. Plants with larger distribution may have broader adaptability and greater resistance to climate change. We found, under the future climate conditions, the distribution of P. orientalis increased slightly at first, but then began to decrease and fragment as the suitable areas shifted to higher latitudes and elevations during climate warming intensification; these trends are in line with those of previous studies [31, 50–52]. For example, the suitable habitat area for Pinus massoniana will shrink [53–54] and that of Pseudotaxus chienii will likely become fragmented [55] and reduced under climate change. Habitat fragmentation represents a major threat to tree populations by reducing local population size and gene flow from other populations, which in turn can decrease outcrossing rates, genetic variation [56–59] and the adaptation to future climates. Little is known about the magnitude, direction or time scale of habitat fragmentation impacts on reproductive success and ultimately population viability of P. orientalis. In addition to shifts to higher latitudes and elevations, attentions should also be taken to fragmentation and shrinkage in habitats in evaluating the climate change impacts and developing a global change forest management strategy.

The combined effects of climatic changes and future land use transformations will increase unsuitable habitats more than one can predict [60]. Our analysis suggested that P. orientalis has a broad adaptability under the current and future climates, but much of the suitable area might disappear due to land use transformations and humans exploitation for economic purpose. Practically the entire suitable habitat of P. orientalis is transected by or within the vicinity of populated places, and much of the suitable area for P. orientalis has already been converted into agriculture or urbanized. Studies are still needed to qualify the anthropogenic impacts on the adaptation to future climates for this wide-spread conifer tree.

Seven sectors of high risk in the face of climate change have been identified in China: (i) northern semiarid, semihumid areas; (ii) the northwestern semiarid region; (iii) the North China Plain; (iv) Southern Hills; (v) the southwestern mountain region; (vi) the southwestern limestone mountain region; and (vii) the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [61]. Areas that may become unsuitable for P. orientalis under the future climate scenario/year combination RCP2.6–2050 matched susceptible regions previously identified. Under combination RCP2.6–2070, regions losing the most suitable habitat area were the susceptible sectors previously identified as (iv) and (vi) above, and the South Hills area. Large losses of suitable habitat also occurred in sectors (iv) and (vi) under scenario/year combination RCP8.5–2050 and RCP8.5–2070. The predictions of distribution change in the present study were performed based on two extreme greenhouse emission scenarios (RCP2.6 and RCP8.5) from one General Circulation Model (GCM). The projections for future climate can be very different among GCMs. Nonetheless, we hope the extreme scenarios we molded will present a broadly forecast for the species´ range shift under future conditions. More modeling under a range of climate conditions are needed to reach a better resolution and a stronger recommendation for conservation operations.

Adaptation strategies to climate change, such as assisted migration, have gained increasing attention as we seek to help plants keep pace with changing climatic conditions [62]. Our modeling predicted an apparent shift of suitable habitat area for P. orientalis toward high latitudes and elevations, and also identified the low elevation regions in southern China facing high risks of habitat loss. We propose the following management strategy in response to future climate change: (1) implementation of seed collection and banking actions across the entire species range to provide a safety net in the face of natural and human uncertainty; (2) a focus on target populations likely to go extinct under climate change, especially those at low altitudes and latitudes; and (3) the use of seeds collected in the southern portion of the range to augment extant plantation in the northern portion, thereby introgressing potentially adaptive traits.

Conclusions

Based on Maxent modeling, we identified a broad habitat for P. orientalis under current climate conditions. The projected distribution matches well the extant range of the species across most of eastern part of China. Annual temperature, monthly minimum ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B), wet-day frequency, and monthly maximum UV-B were important factors shaping the habitat availability for this species. Our model predicted that the shift of habitat to higher latitudes and elevations will become gradually more significant during climate warming intensification, while the species abundance in low-latitude regions will decrease. The projected spatial and temporal pattern of range shifts for P. orientalis will be a useful reference in developing forest management and conservation strategies for this ecologically important species.

Supporting Information

S1 Dataset. Occurrence records of P. orientalis used for ecological modeling.

(CSV)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132326.s001

(CSV)

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Xiang-Yang Kang for his constructive comments on the project.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JFM YL XRW. Performed the experiments: XGH YJ. Analyzed the data: XGH YJ. Wrote the paper: XGH JFM.

References

1. Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, et al. Climate Change 2013. The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change-Abstract for decision-makers. Groupe d'experts intergouvernemental sur l'evolution du climat/Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change-IPCC, C/O World Meteorological Organization, 7bis Avenue de la Paix, CP 2300 CH-1211 Geneva 2 (Switzerland), 2013.
2. Pan G-X, Gao M, Hu G-H, Wei Q-P, Yang X-G, Zhang W-Z, et al. Impacts of climate change on agricultural production of China. Journal of Agro-Environment Science. 2011;30(9):1698–1706.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Fitzpatrick MC, Gove AD, Sanders NJ, Dunn RR. Climate change, plant migration, and range collapse in a global biodiversity hotspot: the Banksia (Proteaceae) of Western Australia. Global Change Biology. 2008;14(6):1337–1352.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Lawler JJ, Shafer SL, White D, Kareiva P, Maurer EP, Blaustein AR, et al. Projected climate-induced faunal change in the Western Hemisphere. Ecology. 2009;90(3):588–597. pmid:19341131
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice IC. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(23):8245–8250. pmid:15919825
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Wang T, Campbell EM, O’Neill GA, Aitken SN. Projecting future distributions of ecosystem climate niches: uncertainties and management applications. Forest Ecology and Management. 2012;279:128–140.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Fitzpatrick M, Gotelli N, Ellison A. MaxEnt versus MaxLike: empirical comparisons with ant species distributions. Ecosphere, 2013; 4 (5): art55.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Bertrand R, Perez V, Gégout JC. Disregarding the edaphic dimension in species distribution models leads to the omission of crucial spatial information under climate change: the case of Quercus pubescens in France. Global Change Biology. 2012;18(8):2648–2660.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Faleiro FV, Machado RB, Loyola RD. Defining spatial conservation priorities in the face of land-use and climate change. Biological Conservation. 2013;158:248–257.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological modelling. 2006;190(3):231–259.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Dong T-M, Chen X-Y, Zhang X-M, Li Z-R, Kong W-H. Platycladus orientalis. Zhengzhou, Henan: Henan Science and Technology Press; 1990.
12. Chu J-M, Wang Y, Wang Q, Li S-N, Hu S-M, Wang Y-H. Absorption and concentration effects of evergreen species (Pinus tabuliformis and Platycladus orientalis) to typical pollutants. Journal of Meteorology and Environment. 2012;28(3):15–20.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Cheng J-Q, Yang J-J, Liu P, Yang J-J, Liu P. Chinese woody plants. Beijing: China Forestry Press; 1992.
14. Luo W-X, He W-X, Jia-Lin Z. Studies on the provenance trial of Platycladus orientalis (L) at seedling stage. Shaanxi Forest Science and Techonlogy. 1988;16(2):1–6.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Shi X-B, Qu X-K. Studies on the provenance trial of Platycladus orientalis (L) at seedling stage. Forest Science and Technology. 1987;7:15–16.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Wang R-Z, Wang M. Preliminary report on provenance test on Platycladus orientalis (L). The Journal of Hebei Forestry Science and Technology. 1990;18(1):30–34.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Mao J-F, Wang X-R. Distinct niche divergence characterizes the homoploid hybrid speciation of Pinus densata on the Tibetan Plateau. The American Naturalist. 2011;177(4):424–439. pmid:21460565
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology. 2005;25(15):1965–1978.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Beckmann M, Václavík T, Manceur AM, Šprtová L, Wehrden H, Welk E, et al. glUV: a global UV-B radiation data set for macroecological studies. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2014;5(4):372–383.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Weyant J, Azar C, Kainuma M, Kejun J, Nakicenovic N, Shukla P, et al. Report of 2.6 versus 2.9 Watts/m² RCPP evaluation panel. Integrated Assessment Modeling Consortium. 2009.
21. Fielding AH, Bell JF. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental conservation. 1997;24(1):38–49.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science. 1988;240(4857):1285–1293. pmid:3287615
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Jimenez-Valverde A, Lobo JM. Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either-or presence-absence. Acta Oecologica. 2007;31(3):361–369.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Brown JL. SDMtoolbox: a python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2014,5(7): 694–700.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Hamann A, Wang T. Potential effects of climate change on ecosystem and tree species distribution in British Columbia. Ecology. 2006;87(11):2773–2786. pmid:17168022
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Wang L-H, Yang J-X, Zheng Y-H, Tang G-G. Modelling the geographic distribution of Malus baccata. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 2011;33(3):70–74.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Cheaib A, Badeau V, Boe J, Chuine I, Delire C, Dufrene E, et al. Climate change impacts on tree ranges: model intercomparison facilitates understanding and quantification of uncertainty. Ecology Letters. 2012;15(6):533–544. pmid:22433068
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Iverson LR, McKenzie D. Tree-species range shifts in a changing climate: detecting, modeling, assisting. Landscape Ecology. 2013;28(5):879–889.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Guo Y-L, Wei H-Y, Lu C-Y, Zhang H-L, Gu W. Predictions of potential geographical distribution of Sinopodophyllum hexandrum under climate change. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology. 2014;38(3):249–261.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Khanum R, Mumtaz A, Kumar S. Predicting impacts of climate change on medicinal asclepiads of Pakistan using Maxent modeling. Acta Oecologica. 2013;49:23–31.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Leng W, He HS, Liu H. Response of larch species to climate changes. Journal of Plant Ecology. 2008;1(3):203–205.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Jiang Z-P, Wang H-R. Taxonomy of the cupressaceae: subfamilies, tribes and genera. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica. 1997;35(3):236–248.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Shi W-Y. Study on Provenance test of Platycladus orientalis (L) at seedling stage Journal of Beijing Forestry University. 1986;8(1):74–83.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Wu X-MM Ji. Different provenances of Platycladus orientalis on photosynthetic characteristics and seed germination responses to water stress. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 1988;24(2):446–453.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Wang JR, Hawkins C, Letchford T. Photosynthesis, water and nitrogen use efficiencies of four paper birch (Betula papyrifera) populations grown under different soil moisture and nutrient regimes. Forest Ecology and Management. 1998;112(3):233–244.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Li J-GX, Wen-Xue . A study on the sources variation test of Platycladus orientalis seedling. LiaoNing Forestry Science and Technology. 1986;6:005.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Liang Y-C. Canonical correlation analysis of Platycladus orientalis between seedling growth and climatic factors. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 1990;26(4):308–315.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Yang Z-M, Yan J-Y, Zhen Y-F, Wan C-J. Effects of increased ultraviolet radiation on growth of plants. Plant Physiology Commumications. 1994;30(4):241–248.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Caldwell MM, Teramura AH, Tevini M. Effects of increased solar ultraviolet radiation on terrestrial plants. Ambio. 1995;24(3):166–173.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Battaglia PR, Brennan TM. Differential effects of short-term exposure to ultraviolet-B radiation upon photosynthesis in cotyledons of a resistant and a susceptible species. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2000;161(5):771–778.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Ballaré CL, Barnes PW, Flint SD. Inhibition of hypocotyl elongation by ultraviolet-B radiation in de-etiolating tomato seedlings. I. The photoreceptor. Physiologia Plantarum. 1995;93(4):584–592.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Wu J-B, Guan D-X, Yuan F-H, Zhang X-J. Research advances on the biological effects of elevated ultraviolet-B radiation on terrestrial plants. Journal of Forestry Research. 2009;20(4):383–390.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Caldwell MM, Björn LO, Bornman JF, Flint SD, Kulandaivelu G, Teramura AH, et al. Effects of increased solar ultraviolet radiation on terrestrial ecosystems. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 1998;46(1):40–52.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Qaderi MM, Reid DM. Growth and physiological responses of canola (Brassica napus) to UV-B and CO₂ under controlled environment conditions. Physiologia Plantarum. 2005;125(2):247–259.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Teklemariam T, Blake TJ. Effects of UVB preconditioning on heat tolerance of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2003;50(2):169–182.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Bertrand R, Lenoir J, Piedallu C, Riofrío-Dillon G, de Ruffray P, Vidal C, et al. Changes in plant community composition lag behind climate warming in lowland forests. Nature. 2011;479(7374):517–520. pmid:22012261
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Meshinev T, Apostolova I, Koleva E, Deil U, Loidi J. “Influence of warming on timberline rising: a case study on Pinus peuce Griseb. in Bulgaria.” Vegetation and climate. A selection of contributions presented at the 42nd Symposium of the International Association of Vegetation Science, Bilbao, Spain, 26–30 July 1999. Gebrüder Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, 2000, 30(3/4): 431–438.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Walther GR, Beißner S, Burga CA. Trends in the upward shift of alpine plants. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2005;16(5):541–548.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Lenoir J, Gégout J, Marquet P, De Ruffray P, Brisse H. A significant upward shift in plant species optimum elevation during the 20th century. Science. 2008;320(5884):1768–1771. pmid:18583610
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Parmesan C, Yohe G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature. 2003;421(6918):37–42. pmid:12511946
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature. 2003;421(6918):57–60. pmid:12511952
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Zhang Y-J, Dai L-M, Pan J. The trend of tree line on the northern slope of Changbai Mountain. Journal of Forestry Research. 2001;12(2):97–100.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. He Q-T, Yuan J-Z, Chen Z-B. The impacts of climate changes on the distribution of Pinus massoniana and Pinus yunnanensis. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. 1996;18(01):23–29.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
54. Xu D-Y. Relationship between China's forest and global climatic change. Forest Science & Technology Management.2002, (4):19–23.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
55. Xu X-T, Yang Y, Wang L-S. Geographic distribution and potential distribution estimation of Pseudotaxus chienii. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology. 2008;32(5):1134–1145.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
56. Newman BJ, Ladd P, Brundrett M, Dixon KW. Effects of habitat fragmentation on plant reproductive success and population viability at the landscape and habitat scale. Biological Conservation. 2013;159(0):16–23.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
57. Vranckx GUY, Jacquemyn H, Muys B, Honnay O. Meta-Analysis of Susceptibility of Woody Plants to Loss of Genetic Diversity through Habitat Fragmentation. Conservation Biology. 2012;26(2):228–237. pmid:22044646
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
58. Collingham YC, Huntley B. Impacts of habitat fragmentation and patch size upon migration rates. Ecological Applications. 2000;10(1):131–144.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
59. Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2003:487–515.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
60. Midgley G, Hannah L, Millar D, Thuiller W, Booth A. Developing regional and species-level assessments of climate change impacts on biodiversity in the Cape Floristic Region. Biological Conservation. 2003;112(1):87–97.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
61. Zhao Y-L, Liu Y-H. The division of type and dicision of range on fragil environment in China. Yunnan Geographic Environment Research. 1994;6(2):34–44.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
62. Williams MI, Dumroese RK. Preparing for climate change: forestry and assisted migration. Journal of Forestry. 2013;111(4):287–297.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, et al. Climate Change 2013. The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change-Abstract for decision-makers. Groupe d'experts intergouvernemental sur l'evolution du climat/Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change-IPCC, C/O World Meteorological Organization, 7bis Avenue de la Paix, CP 2300 CH-1211 Geneva 2 (Switzerland), 2013.

[ref2] 2. Pan G-X, Gao M, Hu G-H, Wei Q-P, Yang X-G, Zhang W-Z, et al. Impacts of climate change on agricultural production of China. Journal of Agro-Environment Science. 2011;30(9):1698–1706.
View Article
Google Scholar

[3] View Article

[4] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Fitzpatrick MC, Gove AD, Sanders NJ, Dunn RR. Climate change, plant migration, and range collapse in a global biodiversity hotspot: the Banksia (Proteaceae) of Western Australia. Global Change Biology. 2008;14(6):1337–1352.
View Article
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Lawler JJ, Shafer SL, White D, Kareiva P, Maurer EP, Blaustein AR, et al. Projected climate-induced faunal change in the Western Hemisphere. Ecology. 2009;90(3):588–597. pmid:19341131
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] PubMed/NCBI

[11] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice IC. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(23):8245–8250. pmid:15919825
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] PubMed/NCBI

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Wang T, Campbell EM, O’Neill GA, Aitken SN. Projecting future distributions of ecosystem climate niches: uncertainties and management applications. Forest Ecology and Management. 2012;279:128–140.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Fitzpatrick M, Gotelli N, Ellison A. MaxEnt versus MaxLike: empirical comparisons with ant species distributions. Ecosphere, 2013; 4 (5): art55.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Bertrand R, Perez V, Gégout JC. Disregarding the edaphic dimension in species distribution models leads to the omission of crucial spatial information under climate change: the case of Quercus pubescens in France. Global Change Biology. 2012;18(8):2648–2660.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Faleiro FV, Machado RB, Loyola RD. Defining spatial conservation priorities in the face of land-use and climate change. Biological Conservation. 2013;158:248–257.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological modelling. 2006;190(3):231–259.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Dong T-M, Chen X-Y, Zhang X-M, Li Z-R, Kong W-H. Platycladus orientalis. Zhengzhou, Henan: Henan Science and Technology Press; 1990.

[ref12] 12. Chu J-M, Wang Y, Wang Q, Li S-N, Hu S-M, Wang Y-H. Absorption and concentration effects of evergreen species (Pinus tabuliformis and Platycladus orientalis) to typical pollutants. Journal of Meteorology and Environment. 2012;28(3):15–20.
View Article
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Cheng J-Q, Yang J-J, Liu P, Yang J-J, Liu P. Chinese woody plants. Beijing: China Forestry Press; 1992.

[ref14] 14. Luo W-X, He W-X, Jia-Lin Z. Studies on the provenance trial of Platycladus orientalis (L) at seedling stage. Shaanxi Forest Science and Techonlogy. 1988;16(2):1–6.
View Article
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Shi X-B, Qu X-K. Studies on the provenance trial of Platycladus orientalis (L) at seedling stage. Forest Science and Technology. 1987;7:15–16.
View Article
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Wang R-Z, Wang M. Preliminary report on provenance test on Platycladus orientalis (L). The Journal of Hebei Forestry Science and Technology. 1990;18(1):30–34.
View Article
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Mao J-F, Wang X-R. Distinct niche divergence characterizes the homoploid hybrid speciation of Pinus densata on the Tibetan Plateau. The American Naturalist. 2011;177(4):424–439. pmid:21460565
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology. 2005;25(15):1965–1978.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Beckmann M, Václavík T, Manceur AM, Šprtová L, Wehrden H, Welk E, et al. glUV: a global UV-B radiation data set for macroecological studies. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2014;5(4):372–383.
View Article
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Weyant J, Azar C, Kainuma M, Kejun J, Nakicenovic N, Shukla P, et al. Report of 2.6 versus 2.9 Watts/m² RCPP evaluation panel. Integrated Assessment Modeling Consortium. 2009.

[ref21] 21. Fielding AH, Bell JF. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental conservation. 1997;24(1):38–49.
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science. 1988;240(4857):1285–1293. pmid:3287615
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] PubMed/NCBI

[62] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Jimenez-Valverde A, Lobo JM. Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either-or presence-absence. Acta Oecologica. 2007;31(3):361–369.
View Article
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Brown JL. SDMtoolbox: a python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2014,5(7): 694–700.
View Article
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Hamann A, Wang T. Potential effects of climate change on ecosystem and tree species distribution in British Columbia. Ecology. 2006;87(11):2773–2786. pmid:17168022
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Wang L-H, Yang J-X, Zheng Y-H, Tang G-G. Modelling the geographic distribution of Malus baccata. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 2011;33(3):70–74.
View Article
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Cheaib A, Badeau V, Boe J, Chuine I, Delire C, Dufrene E, et al. Climate change impacts on tree ranges: model intercomparison facilitates understanding and quantification of uncertainty. Ecology Letters. 2012;15(6):533–544. pmid:22433068
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Iverson LR, McKenzie D. Tree-species range shifts in a changing climate: detecting, modeling, assisting. Landscape Ecology. 2013;28(5):879–889.
View Article
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Guo Y-L, Wei H-Y, Lu C-Y, Zhang H-L, Gu W. Predictions of potential geographical distribution of Sinopodophyllum hexandrum under climate change. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology. 2014;38(3):249–261.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Khanum R, Mumtaz A, Kumar S. Predicting impacts of climate change on medicinal asclepiads of Pakistan using Maxent modeling. Acta Oecologica. 2013;49:23–31.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Leng W, He HS, Liu H. Response of larch species to climate changes. Journal of Plant Ecology. 2008;1(3):203–205.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Jiang Z-P, Wang H-R. Taxonomy of the cupressaceae: subfamilies, tribes and genera. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica. 1997;35(3):236–248.
View Article
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Shi W-Y. Study on Provenance test of Platycladus orientalis (L) at seedling stage Journal of Beijing Forestry University. 1986;8(1):74–83.
View Article
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Wu X-MM Ji. Different provenances of Platycladus orientalis on photosynthetic characteristics and seed germination responses to water stress. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 1988;24(2):446–453.
View Article
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Wang JR, Hawkins C, Letchford T. Photosynthesis, water and nitrogen use efficiencies of four paper birch (Betula papyrifera) populations grown under different soil moisture and nutrient regimes. Forest Ecology and Management. 1998;112(3):233–244.
View Article
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Li J-GX, Wen-Xue . A study on the sources variation test of Platycladus orientalis seedling. LiaoNing Forestry Science and Technology. 1986;6:005.
View Article
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Liang Y-C. Canonical correlation analysis of Platycladus orientalis between seedling growth and climatic factors. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 1990;26(4):308–315.
View Article
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Yang Z-M, Yan J-Y, Zhen Y-F, Wan C-J. Effects of increased ultraviolet radiation on growth of plants. Plant Physiology Commumications. 1994;30(4):241–248.
View Article
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Caldwell MM, Teramura AH, Tevini M. Effects of increased solar ultraviolet radiation on terrestrial plants. Ambio. 1995;24(3):166–173.
View Article
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Battaglia PR, Brennan TM. Differential effects of short-term exposure to ultraviolet-B radiation upon photosynthesis in cotyledons of a resistant and a susceptible species. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2000;161(5):771–778.
View Article
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Ballaré CL, Barnes PW, Flint SD. Inhibition of hypocotyl elongation by ultraviolet-B radiation in de-etiolating tomato seedlings. I. The photoreceptor. Physiologia Plantarum. 1995;93(4):584–592.
View Article
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Wu J-B, Guan D-X, Yuan F-H, Zhang X-J. Research advances on the biological effects of elevated ultraviolet-B radiation on terrestrial plants. Journal of Forestry Research. 2009;20(4):383–390.
View Article
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Caldwell MM, Björn LO, Bornman JF, Flint SD, Kulandaivelu G, Teramura AH, et al. Effects of increased solar ultraviolet radiation on terrestrial ecosystems. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 1998;46(1):40–52.
View Article
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Qaderi MM, Reid DM. Growth and physiological responses of canola (Brassica napus) to UV-B and CO₂ under controlled environment conditions. Physiologia Plantarum. 2005;125(2):247–259.
View Article
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Teklemariam T, Blake TJ. Effects of UVB preconditioning on heat tolerance of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2003;50(2):169–182.
View Article
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Bertrand R, Lenoir J, Piedallu C, Riofrío-Dillon G, de Ruffray P, Vidal C, et al. Changes in plant community composition lag behind climate warming in lowland forests. Nature. 2011;479(7374):517–520. pmid:22012261
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Meshinev T, Apostolova I, Koleva E, Deil U, Loidi J. “Influence of warming on timberline rising: a case study on Pinus peuce Griseb. in Bulgaria.” Vegetation and climate. A selection of contributions presented at the 42nd Symposium of the International Association of Vegetation Science, Bilbao, Spain, 26–30 July 1999. Gebrüder Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, 2000, 30(3/4): 431–438.
View Article
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Walther GR, Beißner S, Burga CA. Trends in the upward shift of alpine plants. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2005;16(5):541–548.
View Article
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Lenoir J, Gégout J, Marquet P, De Ruffray P, Brisse H. A significant upward shift in plant species optimum elevation during the 20th century. Science. 2008;320(5884):1768–1771. pmid:18583610
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] PubMed/NCBI

[147] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Parmesan C, Yohe G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature. 2003;421(6918):37–42. pmid:12511946
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature. 2003;421(6918):57–60. pmid:12511952
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] PubMed/NCBI

[155] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Zhang Y-J, Dai L-M, Pan J. The trend of tree line on the northern slope of Changbai Mountain. Journal of Forestry Research. 2001;12(2):97–100.
View Article
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. He Q-T, Yuan J-Z, Chen Z-B. The impacts of climate changes on the distribution of Pinus massoniana and Pinus yunnanensis. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. 1996;18(01):23–29.
View Article
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Xu D-Y. Relationship between China's forest and global climatic change. Forest Science & Technology Management.2002, (4):19–23.
View Article
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Xu X-T, Yang Y, Wang L-S. Geographic distribution and potential distribution estimation of Pseudotaxus chienii. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology. 2008;32(5):1134–1145.
View Article
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Newman BJ, Ladd P, Brundrett M, Dixon KW. Effects of habitat fragmentation on plant reproductive success and population viability at the landscape and habitat scale. Biological Conservation. 2013;159(0):16–23.
View Article
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Vranckx GUY, Jacquemyn H, Muys B, Honnay O. Meta-Analysis of Susceptibility of Woody Plants to Loss of Genetic Diversity through Habitat Fragmentation. Conservation Biology. 2012;26(2):228–237. pmid:22044646
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] PubMed/NCBI

[174] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Collingham YC, Huntley B. Impacts of habitat fragmentation and patch size upon migration rates. Ecological Applications. 2000;10(1):131–144.
View Article
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2003:487–515.
View Article
Google Scholar

[179] View Article

[180] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Midgley G, Hannah L, Millar D, Thuiller W, Booth A. Developing regional and species-level assessments of climate change impacts on biodiversity in the Cape Floristic Region. Biological Conservation. 2003;112(1):87–97.
View Article
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Zhao Y-L, Liu Y-H. The division of type and dicision of range on fragil environment in China. Yunnan Geographic Environment Research. 1994;6(2):34–44.
View Article
Google Scholar

[185] View Article

[186] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Williams MI, Dumroese RK. Preparing for climate change: forestry and assisted migration. Journal of Forestry. 2013;111(4):287–297.
View Article
Google Scholar

[188] View Article

[189] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

The occurrence and distribution of P. orientalis

Current environmental parameters

Future climate scenarios and data

Current and future potential habitat predictions

The core distributional shifts

Results

The species distribution model and its accuracy

Important environmental variables

Future changes in suitable habitat area

The core distributional shifts

Discussion

Conclusions

Supporting Information

S1 Dataset. Occurrence records of P. orientalis used for ecological modeling.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References