Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

Author correction of Table 5

Posted by MeghanBarrett on 16 Mar 2023 at 04:05 GMT

Table 5 was not properly formatted in the final version of the publication (the 4 rows were collapsed into 2 rows), and issuing a correction is challenging; PLoS has suggested I clarify the table results in a comment. I provide a clarified version of the table as text, below:

Comparison Region -- Effect -- F -- p-value
cNIR -- Mean VIS reflectance -- 169.99 -- < 0.0001
cNIR -- Sex/morph -- 6.28 -- 0.0059
fNIR -- Mean VIS reflectance -- 82.16 -- < 0.0001
fNIR - Sex/morph -- 3.37 -- 0.0498

No competing interests declared.