Figures
The captions for Table 1 and Table 2 are incorrectly switched. Please see the corrected Table 1 and Table 2, along with their correct captions below.
Research track assessments consider changes to existing stock assessment models based on new information and research. Most of these species have life history variables that are associated with environmental variables. These associations should be considered in the research track assessment and should also influence new research on climate-enhanced stock assessments.
In the ‘Climate-informed living marine resource management in the northeast U.S.’ subsection of Introduction section, there is an error in the sixth and seventh sentences of the second paragraph. The correct sentences are: In the northeast U.S., research track assessments (Table 2) are the primary on-ramp to evaluate new commercial species stock assessment models that are informed with climate information. This is highlighted in the process illustrated in Fig 3 and S1 Fig and it suggests that new climate-fisheries research is targeted and timed with upcoming research track assessments detailed in Table 2.
Reference
- 1. Saba V, Borggaard D, Caracappa JC, Chambers RC, Clay PM, Colburn LL, et al. (2023) NOAA fisheries research geared towards climate-ready living marine resource management in the northeast United States. PLOS Clim 2(12): e0000323. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000323
Citation: Saba V, Borggaard D, Caracappa JC, Chambers RC, Clay PM, Colburn LL, et al. (2024) Correction: NOAA fisheries research geared towards climate-ready living marine resource management in the northeast United States. PLOS Clim 3(12): e0000555. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000555
Published: December 19, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Saba et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.